Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare 1984 and today's world
Karl marx philosophy
Karl marx theory on communism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare 1984 and today's world
While Mao Zedong’s China and Orwell’s 1984 society share many similarities, Mao Zedong shows difference by running a communist regime, slightly different to that of a totalitarian regime found in 1984. Before Mao Zedong was exposed to the ideals of Karl Marx, Mao Zedong was enrolled in a school called the First Provincial Normal School. At this school, Mao led an organization called the New People’s Study Society, and this is where Mao began to form his intellect and politics. Rebecca E. Karl, in her book titled, Mao Zedong and China in the Twentieth Century, discusses the importance of this educational space for Mao Zedong. Karl states, “A student organization that Mao led, produced many future members of the Chinese Communist Party: friendships
Mao Zedong was a very influential man in history. He forever changed the face of Chinese politics and life as a whole. His communist views and efforts to modernize China still resonate in the country today. Jonathan Spence’s book titled Mao Zedong is a biography of the great Chinese leader. Spence aims to show how Mao evolved from a poor child in a small rural village, to the leader of a communist nation. The biography is an amazing story of a person’s self determination and the predictability of human nature. The book depicts how a persuasive voice can shape the minds of millions and of people. It also shows the power and strength that a movement in history can make. This biography tells an important part of world history-the communist takeover of China.
Benito Mussolini once said, “We do not argue with those who disagree with us, we destroy them” (Benito). This quote from Mussolini perfectly illustrates his aggressive leadership style and fierce personality. George Orwell was clearly inspired by Benito Mussolini whose characteristics are evident in the character of Big Brother in Orwell’s brilliant novel 1984. Benito Mussolini and Big Brother are considered dictators who have sole control of their countries, Italy and Oceania. Mussolini runs his Italian National Fascist party and Big Brother runs his ‘Party’. Both dictators have some slight differences, but Mussolini and Big Brother have similarities in leadership style, propaganda use, and enforcement of order through secret police.
North Korea, China, and even Cuba are similar to 1984. They try to control their people just the same as in 1984, and just like in Jonestown. The only people who were free in 1984 were the Proles. The community in Jonestown began as everyone wanting to be there, and then as conditions worsened the people wanted to leave. They were not allowed to, much like 1984. The people in both situations are similar, in that they are oppressed by their governments, but only the people in Jonestown are given the ability to think they are even able to
eorge Orwell’s 1949 classic 1984 is a hauntingly original entry into the dystopian science fiction genre. The main elements that elevate Orwell’s novel into a masterpiece are its setting, characterizations, theme, and symbolism, which will be discussed in this paper. The theme and main idea of 1984 is rebellion from a totalitarian regime.
Humans always have had a tendency to allow the poor and miserable to suffer, even while the wealthy continue to fatten and flourish in needed yet often unshared resources. The social order has shaped a distinctive hierarchy composed of the High, the Middle, and the Low in an exceedingly flawed and callous structure. This system has been implemented in our history over a variety of ages and civilizations. More importantly, the structure has not been altered to work for any system except for theoretical Communism and Socialism. The novel 1984 was a shock to the masses when it was released, but by showing the class structure and political satire Orwell was able to present not only the danger of Communism gone awry but its repercussions on society.
Symbols usually consist of objects, characters, or figures expressing a larger concept or idea. In 1984, symbols find themselves in many main ideas and themes. Some symbols are used to represent a deeper meaning in characters and plot, while others show comparison and contrast between ideas. Several of these symbols are clearly shown throughout the book, catching the attention of the reader to further the understanding of the battling themes. Sometimes, words do not come close to describing what is going on.
Adam Smith kills his ex-wife Lisa over her social media rants about his lack of paying child support. He then left the mutilated body in his 5-year old son’s room for his child to find. The rapid development of social media, technology, and lack thereof education is leading the United States of America towards a very dark and gloomy future. I believe the only way to prevent a future that resembles a lifestyle depicted in the books 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 is to educate the younger generations on the dangers of technology. Until then, America is headed towards a very dark future due to the rise of social media and technology, and the lack of education the is being delivered to unplug the world.
Movies such as the Hunger Games and Divergent gain popular acclaim for their presentation of a dystopic world. To citizens in democratic countries, a dystopian society such as those in the movies above may seem far from reality and similar to George Orwell’s fictitious society in 1984. On the contrary, dystopian societies are far from fiction and are prevalent in various autocratic countries around the world. The daunting societies present in George Orwell’s 1984 as well as Veronica Ma’s depiction of communist China in “Propaganda and censorship: adapting to the modern age” are the consequences of abusing language’s power. The Party and the Chinese government’s use of censorship solely for political success reflects Orwell’s belief of language being power. The political usage of censorship by both, the Party and communist China, destroys individuality by the suppression of one’s mind, expression and actions in order to prevent rebellion amongst its citizens.
George Orwell is considered to be one of the most creative and expressive political writers of the twentieth century, particularly for his views opposing communism and totalitarian regimes famously expressed in his novel, 1984. Orwell perceived communism as, “A new, dangerous form of totalitarianism, a powerful tool for controlling the masses.” Orwell’s hatred towards communism began with communist leader, Joseph Stalin whom he referred to as, “a bloody-minded master” (Rossi 1). Orwell’s views solidified during his participation in the Spanish Civil War; throughout his experience, Orwell was subject to communist propaganda, which led to his distrust of authority and established hatred of fascist and communist governments (Rossi 2). Orwell’s views, along with his participation ...
In conclusion, our presentation attempted to explore the phenomena of the book Communist Manifesto, which was written by Karl Marx based on his socialist theory, and how it relates to George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Karl Marx is a well-known German philosopher. However, he is best known as a revolutionary communist and socialist, whose work including the Communist Manifesto has influenced many historical movements. Communism and Socialism advocate the same political and economic systems that the means of production should be controlled by the community as a whole rather than individual or private companies. However, socialism grows directly out of capitalism and is the first step of the new society, whereas communism is
And he debates that the end of the Cold War is “an ideal context for a reassessment of Orwell 's political ideas” (Newsinger ix). Newsinger gives us a map of Orwell 's intellectual terrain, and deftly orientates the reader around the key Orwellian debates which run around the idea of war and revolution against inequality and dictatorship. He examines how Orwell 's politics developed in a changing world. Newsinger 's argument is that, although Orwell 's politics shifted throughout his lifetime, the one constant was his unwavering socialism. What detractors - and even some admirers - have missed is that he never ceased to write from within the left, attacking the betrayal of the revolution rather than the revolution
George Orwell once said, “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” Orwell understood that telling the truth was an anomaly. He lived in a world full of lies and hatred. Consequently, George Orwell wanted to show people the real dangers of a totalitarian government, and he wrote two political novels that warn people of those dangers. These novels are still respected today, as some believe the world is turning into the “Orwellian” society he created in his most famous book, 1984. Although George Orwell wanted to tell the truth, he lacked a father figure, lived during the Russian Revolution, and had strong political biases that also influenced the writing of 1984, which ultimately influenced the political advocates of his time.
Love is the foundation and the weakness of a totalitarian regime. For a stable totalitarian society, love between two individuals is eliminated because only a relationship between the person and the party and a love for its leader can exist. The totalitarian society depicted throughout the Orwell’s novel 1984 has created a concept of an Orwellian society. Stalin’s Soviet state can be considered Orwellian because it draws close parallels to the imaginary world of Oceania in 1984. During the twentieth century, Soviet Russia lived under Stalin’s brutal and oppressive governments, which was necessary for Stalin to retain power. In both cases, brutality and oppression led to an absence of relationships and love. This love was directed towards Stalin and Big Brother, and human beings became willing servants of their leader. The biggest threat to any totalitarian regime is love, or the lack of it. As Orwell said, they key danger to the system is “the growth of liberalism and skepticism in their own ranks” (Orwell 171). For example, in the novel it was the desire of the Party to eliminate love and sex, in order to channel this pent-up passion towards the love of Big Brother. Similarly, Stalin used propaganda and extreme nationalism to brainwash the peoples of Russia. He channeled their beliefs into a passion for Soviet ideals and a love of Stalin. In both cases, love for anything but the Party is the biggest threat to the regime. The stability of the Party and Stalin’s regime directly depended upon loyalty to the government above all else. By drawing upon the close relationships between the two Orwellian societies, we can examine just how dangerous love is to the Party.
When examining the totalitarian government of 1984 by George Orwell, a direct connection can be drawn to the motives and ideals associated with Niccoló Machiavelli’s The Prince. Machiavelli’s support of the political necessity as a means to remain in power resonate with the government whose aim is to “extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought” as a way to ensure complete political orthodoxy within the country (193). Specifically, Machiavellian thought plays an important part in 1984 as its ideas on reputation, revolution, avoiding hatred, and the use of fear to control a populace are used by INGSOC in order to maintain complete control throughout the story. In the following paragraphs, the connections between these two works above will be elaborated on in an attempt to show the Machiavellian influence of the government in 1984.
Today, communism is most often associated with totalitarian governments. However, the principles of communism, set up by Karl Marx, are not similar to those seen in these governments now. Chris Routledge, freelance writer, editor, and teacher at a university near Liverpool in the United Kingdom says that “pure communism” was intended to be a utopian society where all the wealth would be equally shared and money would not rule people’s lives (569). Over the past half-century, pure communism has stirred up entire nations. For example, The Soviet Union threatened the world with nuclear weapons during the Cold War and North Korea has done the same. Richard John Neuhaus, prominent American clergy and writer, claims that the Soviet Union was responsible for much of the Cold War (75).