English Only Movement

994 Words2 Pages

The ongoing debate across our great and diverse nation is whether there should be enacted into law an official native tongue: that being English. Throughout the world, the United States has been viewed throughout its existence as a nation to be a melting pot of cultures and ethnicities unlike any seen before. Since the time of the settlers, one could take notice quite easily the German Jagerhaus, the British Pubs, as well as the Italian eateries- each flared with a distinct flavor and language. This vast difference seen is what makes America unique. Up until the very recent future, it was unheard of anywhere but our great land to be able to sit in a classroom and have classmates from Asia, Europe, Africa, The Middle East and Latin America. This great blend of society continues to advance our perceptions of the world as well as hone in on the principle that it is okay to be distinctive. What purpose, then, would having a law in place requiring one to utilize a certain language? What may be surprising to learn is that this has been a long standing issue on the political dinner plate in America. Mandates have appeared on language as early as 1803 upon the acquisition of the Louisiana Purchase from the French. This move required all citizens of the territory to conduct business, handle legal matters and instruct all students in schools in English (us-english.org). In 1847, a law was enacted to repeal part of the mandate set upon this area. The law authorized Anglo-French instruction to occur in public schools. This, along with all French language rights, was desecrated following the Civil War (The Civil War Society). During this westward ‘expansion’, many feathers were ruffled as a result. Another example is the acquisition of l... ... middle of paper ... ...Brian. Democracy in California: Politics and Government in the Golden State (IIed). San Francisco: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2007. Martin, James J. An American Adventure in Bookburning in the Style of 1918. Ralph Myles Publisher, 1988. Pullum, George K. "Here Come the Linguistic Fascits." National Language and Linguistic Theory (1987): 603-9. Roosevelt, Theodore. Works Memorial Edition. New York: Charles Scribner's 11 Sons, 1926. Volunme XXIV. The Civil War Society. French-Americans in the Civil War. 16 02 2002. 31 10 2011. United States Department of Agriculture. Spanish Language of the United States. Government Report. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, 2008. us-english.org. Background of Organization. 11 12 2008. Background of Organization. 1 November 2011. www.snopes.com. Official Language Vote. 14 09 2006. 10 11 2011.

Open Document