Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
what is effects of society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: what is effects of society
In today’s world, prejudice is just as profound as it was in years past if not more so. It can be found in nearly all aspects of life and sometimes is not even known to exist. One thing that has changed regarding prejudice is its appearance. Before the Civil War and through the 1960s, prejudice could be most commonly defined as a physical degrading of African-Americans. They were looked down upon and treated poorly, often being physically harmed as slaves and forced to use separate restrooms, drinking fountains, and sit in different locations on a city bus during the civil rights movement. Today, prejudice is ironic in the fact that it knows no specific race and affects everyone.
According to Myers (2011), intelligence varies immensely among groups. For example, there are differences between men and women and among racial groups, and these differences can be attributed to many factors such as genetics and location. To note some of the different influences on intelligence, Myers discusses genetic influences. Identical twins that have been reared together have such similar scores on an intelligence test that it is almost as if one person took the test twice. Conversely, fraternal twins produced scores that were not as similar, demonstrating that the more similar genetic makeup of the identical twins played a role in their similar scoring on the test. Myers then discusses the influence differences in environment will have on intelligence, citing that adopted children will have an intelligence level more similar to their biological parents than their adoptive parents as they grow into adulthood. Children in destitute human environments such as third-world orphanages suffered delayed development as opposed to children in nur...
... middle of paper ...
...threat. By acknowledging the existence of prejudice and stereotypes, the first steps can be taken to remove them from our society. Experimenters like Steele and Aronson, Cohen, and Schmader are not only helping to acknowledge that there are still ongoing problems with stereotypes and prejudice, but by acknowledging their existence, they are helping to shrink the intelligence gaps among people of different genders and races. Many of the racial problems in our nation today could be diminished if not eliminated by extinguishing the stereotype threat; the playing field would be more level among young people of all races, and this would eventually to a more harmonized nation.
Works Cited
Myers, D. G. (2011). Exploring psychology: Eighth edition in modules. New York, NY: Worth Publisher.
Yong, E. (2013). Armor against prejudice. Scientific American, 308(6), 76-80.
The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593
Prejudice is an issue that cannot be easily avoided in today's society. It has and always will have a huge impact on the discrimination that some people face based on religion, appearance, background, mental/physical disabilities and etc.
Wood, S. E., Wood, E. R., & Boyd, D. R. (2004). Mastering the world of psychology (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Gone are the days of legalized slavery, of Nazi Germany, of women being incapable of having a notable opinion. No longer is there a system of racial segregation adopted by an entire country, complete white supremacy or lynchings performed by the Ku Klux Klan. Yet, although we are no longer exposed to such past experiences and despite us living in a world where diversity is embraced more than ever, the existence of prejudice remains. Today we have universally come to accept multiculturalism, varied ethnic backgrounds and those populations who historically were forever stigmatized. But in spite of these developments prejudice has manifested itself in other, more subtle ways and no matter how modernized society become such unfavourable attitudes
Davis, S. F., & Palladino, J. J. (2003). Psychology. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
America has always struggled with discrimination and prejudice throughout its history. On July 2nd, 1964 the United States took a step in the right direction, when it recognized the principle that all men are created equal with the passage of the Civil Rights Act. The Act outlawed all discrimination formed on the basis of race, religious affiliation, gender or ethnic origin. In addition, it ended racial segregation in educational institutions and in the workplace. However, it can be argued that discrimination and prejudice remain today. America has attempted to stop this by instituting anti-discrimination laws, however the laws can only do so much.
Myers, David G. Psychological Disorders. Exploring Psychology in Modules. New York, NY: Worth. N.pag. Print
When the word “prejudice” is mentioned in public conversation, undertones of anger and unfairness usually accompany it. Prejudice is often defined as a predetermined opinion not based on fact,experience, or knowledge. Many acts of inequalities and discriminative wrong-doings in history can be traced back to being a result of prejudice.So what place does a concept with such a negative connotation have in an institution of higher education where students and faculty of varying cultures and backgrounds come together to learn? Instinctively, a good number of people would answer that prejudice and its negative consequences have no place in such an environment. However, a contradicting opinion is expressed in an article written by Jonathan Rauch titled “In Defense of Prejudice” . In this article, Rauch expresses his dissatisfaction with the
Jr., Bernard E. Whitley and Mary E. Kite. The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination. Belmont: Cengage Learning, 2010. Web.
Myers, D. G. (2005). Exploring psychology: Sixth ediition in modules (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
In our global economy requiring functional and respectful relationships between nations, prejudice and stereotypes can be a destructive force both in the world and in individual societies, especially in diverse ones.
While this assumption is accepted by a majority of geneticists and behavioral scientists, there is great disagreement on the degree of influence each contributes. Arguments for environmental influences are compelling; at the same time there is growing evidence that genetic influence on intelligence is significant and substantial (Eyesenck, 1998; Mackintosh, 1998; Plomin, 1994; Steen, 1996). The purpose of this paper is to explore the question: "How is intelligence influenced by heredity and environment?"
McKinley, J. and Fryer, D. (2004), Higher Psychology: Approaches and Method. KEEGAN, G. (2002) Hodder and Stoughton, London, 298 pp
Boyd, D., Wood, E.G., Wood, S.E. (2014, 2011, 2008). Mastering the world of psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 128-129, 329-330, 335-340. Print.
Professor Bigot argues that intelligence is only influenced by nature, meaning it is entirely based in genetics, and that one's environment or surroundings can't influence it. However, Dr. Bigot's argument does have some truth to it. With the purpose of investigating the role of genetics in intelligence, researchers have approached twin studies. According to Bouchard and McGue (1981), the closer the biological relationship, the higher the IQ correlation is. This idea was the result of a meta-analysis of 111 studies of IQ correlations between siblings from research studies on intelligence. The Minnesota Twin Study (Bouchard et al. 1990) studies identical twins raised together and identical twins raised apart. Bouchard et al (1990) concluded that 70% of intelligence is associated to genetic inheritance. Therefore, 30% of intelligence may be attributed to other factors. Although the Minnesota Twin Study has been one of the most impressive twin studies carried out, there are several criticisms that test its validity. One of its greatest criticisms was the "equal environment assumption", which states that it can't be assumed that twins reared together are exposed to the same environment.