Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
corruption as an issue in Nigeria
Democratic rule in Nigeria politics
brief of corruption in Nigeria
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: corruption as an issue in Nigeria
Nigeria is an oil-rich state located in the eastern part of African. Since gaining independence in 1960, it has faced numerous regime changes. These fluctuations in stable governance have both positively and negatively affected the livelihood of the Nigerian people. The struggle for power has been a toss-up between civilian governments and militaristic dictators, each fighting to gain control of the lucrative oil reserves. As the military seeks to rid corruption from the ruling body, it has brought additional struggles to everyday life in Nigeria. Military governments in Nigeria have proven to be detrimental to the political strive towards democracy, the economic struggle to eliminate debt, and the livelihood of local Africans.
Nigeria gained colonial independence from Britain in 1960. Prior to their independence, Nigeria and Britain held numerous conventions regarding the new government and constitution. The Nigerian government used the Westminster style of government based on Britain’s model. As Nigeria progressed towards self-governance, the constitution was amended in later conventions to curtail it to the needs of society (Coleman 1958, 372). This allowed for a steady adaptation to the new, self-governing system. Democracy in Nigeria lasted until 1966, when the first military government came to power (Joseph 1987, 67).
The military became involved with politics for the betterment of Nigeria. The soldiers within the military believed they were supporting peace, providing economic stability, and respectable leadership within Africa (Agbeese 2004, 81). This, however, proved to not always be the case. The military dictatorships that ruled as a result of the coups were as corrupt as the civilians they overthrew. T...
... middle of paper ...
... Keigh, Jr., Ed. The Military and Politics in Africa: From Engagement to Democratic and Constitutional Control. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2004. Print.
Bauer, Gretchen, and Scott D. Taylor. Politics in Southern Africa: State and Society in Transition. London: Lyne Rienner Publishers, Inc. 2005. Print.
Bratton Michael, and Nicolas Van De Walle. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Print.
Coleman, James S. Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Print.
Joseph, Richard A. The Military in African Politics. Ed. John W. Harbeson. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1987. Print.
Tar, Usman A. The Politics of Neoliberal Democracy in Africa: State and Civil Society in Nigeria. New York: Tauris Academia studies, 2009. Print.
In this section, I will provide a brief history of U.S. military involvement on the African continent, starting with the Barbary Wars and working up through the current date. This historical documentation will highlight the change in the role the United States has played in Africa [post 9-11???]. Prior to 9-11, the United States’ interactions were mainly [capture summary here]. Since [?], however, the continent has faced a marked increase in violent extremism and terrorism leading the United States to partner with many African nations in counterterrorism initiatives. These, and other initiatives, mean an increasing number U.S. service members are deploying to Africa to take part in training, humanitarian issues and military operations. These military activities are run by United States African Command, a recently created combatant command.
Bennett, Norman. Africa and Europe: From Roman Times to National Independence. New York: Africana Publishing Co, 1984.
Wagner, Daniel and Giorgio Cafiero. “China and Nigeria: Neo-Colonialism, South-South Solidarity, or Both?”. The World Post. 19 July 2013. Web. 20 Feb. 2014. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-wagner/china-and-nigeria-neocolo_b_3624204.html
PMCs emerge in a history course as an inevitable result of the changing in world structure and technology development. This critical review examines Anna Leander’s article on the paradox of implementing private military companies (PMCs) in Africa. The central issue is how security can be influenced by the using of PMCs. Building on Leander’s argument, this review argues that PMC is a double-edged sword that can be used to provide security as well as to stir insecurity. The blurred public and private lines and ambiguous regulations of PMCs cannot be neglect thus the use of PMC forces need stronger regulation and a better system of cooperation with other national or international actors. The review will first analyze the reasons for using PMCs as a way to support security in Africa mainly based on Leander’s views and partly on Singer’s points. Then the review will analyze factors contributing to the negative side of PMCs, especially in Darfur’s case and in Iraq’s case.
We must understand the differences in the African and European political experience in order to understand the difficulties faced by African leaders. In Herbst’s book States and Power in Africa, First I will give an overview of the differences between the African and European advances toward becoming a nation state. Next the reasons why these differences are important to understanding the difficulties faced by African leaders will be discussed. Finally I will give an overview of possible alternatives to the current system of states in Africa.
Ploch, L. (2011, July 22). fas.org. Retrieved March 20, 2012, from Africa Command: U.S. Strategic Interests and the Role of the U.S. Military in Africa: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34003.pdf
Emizet, Kisangani N. F. . (2000). Explaining the Rise and Fall of Military Regimes: Civil-Military Relations in the Congo. Armed Forces & Society. 26 (2), p203-227.
In the fateful year of 1884, the Berlin Conference convened (Berlin Conference). The Nigerian natives did not know this, but, because of that meeting and many other factors, they would soon be conquered by Britain, pressured to convert to an alien religion, and would hurt culturally and economically not just during their time as a colony, but even after they achieve independence, with the their future political system inefficient and hard to reform as an added bonus. To begin, this paper’s goal is to reveal the symptoms of Britain's reign over Nigeria and how they continue to be a huge nuisance even today in the form of huge economic, ethnic, and political difficulties.
This paper will discuss the Oil conflict that is occurring in Nigeria. Discussed will be the types of power that the two feuding parties are using and whether their strategies have been effective as well as the influence they have had on the conflict. The contrasting cultural differences and similarities will be discussed as well. The conflict in Nigeria has turned deadly and a successful communication environment must be developed in order to restore peace to the region.
Meredith, Martin. The Fate of Africa: A History of Fifty Years of Independence. New York: PublicAffairs, 2005.
Osaghae, O.E. (1998). Crippled Giant: Nigeria since Independence. London: C. Hurst & Co. Ltd. Reviewed by Akinyetun Tope Shola (M.Sc. Comparative Politics & Development Studies)
In the mid 1980s Africa was struck by a period of famines, desertification, refugees, human rights violations, mutually destructive violence, health problems and economic decline. “among the economic factors, severe balance of trade deficits caused by weak world commodity prices, fluctuating interest rates which cause national debts to swell to unbearable limits, and a severe drop in international aid investment combined to create frustratingly high levels of social-economic hardship.”(Quainoo 6) The issues Africa was facing brought a great deal of doubt to it’s people’s faith in authoritarianism, and eventually led to many protest demanding democratization.
Since Africa’s cities and tribes stand alone in their political practices there is no one representation of government. This results in domestic political concerns of the solidity of the state. All of this contributes as Africa being
Marks, Shula, and Stanley Trapido. "South Africa Since 1976: A Historical Perspective." South Africa: No Turning Back (1988): 1-45. Print.
Corruption can be defined as the use of entrusted power to accumulate public wealthy for personal benefit. Corruption is not peculiar to any country, continent or state; it is sure a global issue which is an endemic to all government all over the world. However, corruption is prevalent in the Niger delta region of Nigeria; public officers in this oil producing state of Nigeria are corrupt. Consequently, it has defied the Niger delta from developing politically and economically which has left the states reputation in a mess. Radicalization of youths, abject poverty and -political instability are the three leading effects of corruption in the Niger delta region of Nigeria.