Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative impact of abortion
Positive and negative effects of abortion
Negative effects of abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative impact of abortion
When working to make an effective argument, the writer must analyze many aspects. For example, who the audience is, what their viewpoint is on the issue, and how to get them to believe the argument. On the topic of abortion, most writers can incorporate an ethical, logical, and emotional appeal to get the point across. However, Lisa Brock, the author of the article, "Life Challenges" does not effectively make her argument because she only develops an appeal to the emotions of the reader.
To make an audience believe an argument, the writer must prove their trustworthiness of the topic. Lisa Brock does not clearly tell the audience why she is qualified to give an opinion on what a woman should do regarding abortion. She merely allows the reader to assume that she is understand because she can adequately describe the emotions a woman feels when just learning she is pregnant. Brock uses phrases like “happiest moments of their lives” and “nightmare” to describe how a woman may feel. This leads the reader to assume that she has been in a similar situation and can relate to how the newly pregnant woman must feel.
Lisa Brock’s logical appeal is lacking considerably. Throughout the entire article there are only a few instances of pregnancy and abortion facts used, and some of those are common sense. She says, “The hormones and extreme emotions of pregnancy make reasonable decisions more difficult.” Most of the industrialized world understands that being pregnant changes a woman’s bodily functions, making her more susceptible to hormonal imbalances. Therefore, using common knowledge as a logical appeal proves to be ineffective. Brock also uses the possibility of infertility after an abortion when she says, “…abortion c...
... middle of paper ...
...anipulate the reader into deciding against having an abortion. Brock is able to manipulate the reader into doing this without the reader even being aware she is being manipulated.
In order to decide whether Lisa Brock’s article on abortion is effective, the intended audience must be known. It seems as though Brock’s intended audience is a woman who is unsure about her pregnancy. In that case, the article is written with enough appeals to emotion to get the point across, as well as, convince the reader that abortion may not be the best option. The writer is able to use diction and tone to convince the reader. She never has to come out and fully say that she believes abortion is the wrong choice. However, the reader can receive that vibe from the author.
Works Cited
Brock, Lisa. "Life Challenges." Abortion. Focus on the Family, 2002. Web. 08 Nov. 2013.
“She may be unmarried or in a bad marriage. She may consider herself too poor to raise a child. She may think her life is too unstable or unhappy, or she may think that her drinking or drug use will damage the baby’s health” (126). The emotional appeal in this paragraph could make the reader think they are pro-choice. Apart from their use of pathos, the authors do a great job using a mixture of both ethos and logos. Page 130 is an example of both, which were used expertly to help the reader understand their point of view and the
The topic of my paper is abortion. In Judith Jarvis Thomson's paper, “A Defense of Abortion,” she presented a typical anti-abortion argument and tried to prove it false. I believe there is good reason to agree that the argument is sound and Thompson's criticisms of it are false.
...e essay she says “but I don’t feel all one way about abortion anymore, and I don’t think it serves a just cause to pretend that many of us do”(629). This quote lets the reader identify with it being okay to feel conflicted about abortion. It seems that often people feel they have to choose sides in the abortion debate. However, Quindlen allows her audience to find comfort and acceptance and not really knowing what they would do if ever faced with this decision. She uses a balance of real life examples that she has experienced and witnessed. Most of her examples touch the reader deep down inside so that they are left feeling as if they were a fly on the wall when these things were going on.
The diverse, and often volatile, points of view associated with the abortion issue often incorporate raw emotion powerful enough to lead to violent behavior. The difficulty in defining the morality of the issue perhaps provides a breeding ground for immoderate thinking brought on by the all or nothing stands of the supporters and opponents of the issue. This intolerance of the "other side" has led t...
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
Provide an outline of the body of the essay (do not include the introduction or conclusion): (1) Thesis, (2) Ethical arguments against abortion, (3) Adoption and Abortion, (4) Abortion proponents and the myth of rape/incest, (5) Psychological and Physiological dangers, (6-7) Position of various presidential candidates, (8) conclusion. For each point in the outline above, state why this section of the paper is important to the main point of the essay. If the point is unimportant, state why.
In the case of Sarah Grosvenor and Amasa Sessions it is evident the roles that society and gender played in the decision of abortion. Sarah lost her life because in that era you could not openly discuss the issue of abortion, and Sessions was praised because he pushed for the abortion and would not bring a bastard child in the world. Abortion still remains today a very controversial topic, and one that many people are not accepted no matter what their view is on the subject. There still remains pressure from many people in society and today’s culture to persuade one’s opinion and decision on abortion. Although it is not talked about, other than people protesting against, or for their rights, it is a legal act, and ultimately the decision of the woman.
In the Judith Jarvis Thomson’s paper, “A Defense of Abortion”, the author argues that even though the fetus has a right to life, there are morally permissible reasons to have an abortion. Of course there are impermissible reasons to have an abortion, but she points out her reasoning why an abortion would be morally permissible. She believes that a woman should have control of her body and what is inside of her body. A person and a fetus’ right to life have a strong role in whether an abortion would be okay. Thomson continuously uses the story of a violinist to get the reader to understand her point of view.
In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. In particular I will take a close look at her famous 'violinist' argument. Following will be objections to the argumentative story focused on the reasoning that one person's right to life outweighs another person's right to autonomy. Then appropriate responses to these objections. Concluding the paper I will argue that Thomson's 'violinist' argument supporting the idea of a mother's right to autonomy outweighing a fetus' right to life does not make abortion permissible.
...point as well. The essay knows that before a woman is pregnant, that even being willing to have sex she is taking a chance. Health wise, society does not hold a concern to how abortion emotionally and physically damages a person, their only reasoning given to what causes their pain after abortion is guilt, which seems to be stereotypical. The case of Roe v. wade holds a logical point by being optional to consider abortion, and if so, will only be safely done through the first trimester of pregnancy to avoid, health issues. My perspective to oppose abortion is similarly relative on the analysis of health reasoning, but my views are also opinionated by the environment I grew upon by. Each abortion guideline is openly acceptable to live by, but the moral of the perspectives carries on what our society as a free citizen lies between: healthcare and freedom of speech.
In A Defense of Abortion (Cahn and Markie), Judith Thomson presents an argument that abortion can be morally permissible even if the fetus is considered to be a person. Her primary reason for presenting an argument of this nature is that the abortion argument at the time had effectively come to a standstill. The typical anti-abortion argument was based on the idea that a fetus is a person and since killing a person is wrong, abortion is wrong. The pro-abortion adopts the opposite view: namely, that a fetus is not a person and is thus not entitled to the rights of people and so killing it couldn’t possibly be wrong.
In conclusion, women have the right to have abortions and to not have abortions. They have the right because it’s their body and it’s unfair to deny any woman that right without knowing the circumstances or situation. At the end of the women have to do what’s best for them and that unborn child and if they don’t have the necessary tools and lifestyle for them and the baby. Advocates of abortion believe that abortion is seriously wrong but it’s the women’s the decision not theirs, they have the right.
From observed and moral claims, a wide range of views supporting either more or less legal restriction on abortion has emerged in America. Politicians define the issue by party lines, while some support groups define the issue through its constitutionality and its moral views symbolized by their residents, largely are consider being pro-choice, or pro-life. The mass media describes the issue as morally, presenting to the nation the views of various pro-life and pro-choice organizations with little realistic evidence from both sides. The countless points that can be taken on this issue can be allocated by practical and moral expectations to a clearer analyze the details of this intense issue. The probability of the woman having a child in the near future would be slim to none. This is because your body cannot handle certain chemicals and mechanics, what does not kill you, will make you stronger; but will cause greater pain to your
Abortion is an extremely controversial issue and one that is continually on the forefront of debates. Those who oppose the idea (Pro-lifers), thinks it is an act of woman playing “God” who live from who dies. Yet, whether an unborn baby constitutes a normal person is questionable; a pregnant woman, on the other hand, has the undeniable right to choose whether she wants to have a child or not. Therefore, the decision to have an abortion is the personal choice and responsibility of the woman, because prohibiting abortion impedes freedom of choice and endangers the physical and mental health of women.