1. Introduction
In this study I want to look at the effect of task complexity on the relationship between team-based incentives and performance. I will thus try to find whether task complexity is a moderating variable in the relation between incentives and performance and specifically try to find whether this effect differs for individual incentives and team incentives.
When looking at incentive contracts in management accounting literature, usually theories from the field of economics and psychology are combined. In some circumstances these theories can lead to quite opposing predictions of the effect of incentives on performance. In general incentive contracts are a decision influencing control tool used to make sure that people’s and the organizations goals are aligned. There are different theories about the effect of incentives on performance. In general, considering the working environment the prediction and empirical finding is that incentives increase performance or ‘you get what you pay for’. Although what you pay for is not always what the company, organization or society actually wants as is explained by Kerr (1975). In this paper I will not focus on these anomalies, but merely on the well-established relation between incentives and performance. Prendergast (1999) sees incentives as ‘the essence of economics’ . There is quite a lot of evidence suggesting that that there is a strong relation between pay-for performance and productivity. This is in line with predictions based on agency theory. Agency theory (Jensen and Meckling (1976), Jensen (1983), Gibbons (1996)) predicts that to make sure the employee exerts effort this needs to be made the rational choice. For it to be rational to exert effort incentives are ne...
... middle of paper ...
...ar. 1992. Peer Pressure and Partnerships, The Journal of Political Economy, 100:4, 801-817
Kerr, Steven. 1975. On the folly of rewarding for A, While Hoping for B, The Academy of Management Journal, 18:4, 769-783.
Lazear, Edward P. 2000. Performance Pay and Productivity, The American Economic Review, 90:5, 1346-1361
Ost, Edward J. 1990. Team-Based Pay: New Wave Strategic Incentives, Sloan Management Review, 31:3, 19-27
Prendergast, Canice. 1999. The Provision of Incentives in Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, 37:1, 7-63
- - - . 1983. Organization Theory and Methodology, The Accounting Review, 58:2, 319-339
Weiss, Andrew. 1987. Incentives and Worker Behavior: Some Evidence, Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research
Wood, Robert E. 1986. Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct, Organization, Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60-82
Gabris and Giles (1983) research also supports the importance of performance incentives and its role in relieving conflict, so much more that it trumps human relations methodologies. Furthermore, it indicates that lack of performance incentives shows weak organizational objectives, behaviors, structural arrangement (Gabris & Giles, 1983). The importance of performance incentives have a dramatic influence on an organization yet it so simple that it may be dismissed.
Mujtaba, B. G., & Shuaib, S. (2010). An Equitable Total Rewards Approach to Pay for Performance Management. Journal of Management Policy and Practice vol. II (4), 111-121.
When employees were asked, what factors could be changed at USAA to help maintain employee motivation levels, a couple of them answered with, “higher wages” and “more money”. This response corroborates other studies regarding pay which state surveys will more likely under emphasize the importance of pay relative to other motivational factors. (Rynes, Gerhart & Minette, 2004). “Financial incentives had by far the largest effect on productivity of all interventions. For example, pay was four times more effective than interventions designed to make work more interesting.” (Rynes, 2004). One reason for this phenomenon is social desirable responding. It should be noted, that although pay may be under reported, the results indicate other factors are also important for employee
Many of Harrah’s employees deemed the goals set by Winn’s current incentive program to be unrealistic; on the other hand, others felt a sense of entitlement for bonuses. Therefore, Winn’s job is to provide a recommendation to Gary Loveman, on how to motivate and get employees energized. In order to motivate the employees, Winn had implemented an incentive pay plan to rewards Harrah’s employees in all of its properties for improving customer service. The company’s purpose for incentive program was to implant a competitive mindset in its employees as well as to show the employees that they are core of the...
Creating and managing effective teams in today’s work environment is much different than it was just a short time ago. With each generation of American workers come new ideas, rules, and methodologies that must be considered when developing an effective team. Some of the newer ideas may have been foreign to managers even ten years ago. An example of this is that many companies today are becoming more socially responsible. A recent article in Incentive states, “Social responsibility, it seems, is the new signing bonus” (Flanagan, p4, 2006). Rarely are managers given a perfect set of employees, a perfect environment, or a team without conflict in order to develop an effective team. These issues make it more important than ever to be able to effectively manage these teams. The simulation for Luxurion was an excellent example of managing a team well, even when the team is not put together perfectly. This paper will examine what team member were chosen, why these choices were made, issues that were worked through during the simulation and the final outcome after completing the simulation.
The company Steel Co, which has been established for around 30 years, has been in a steady decline during the current recession and although a Divisional Director has been employed by the owner the fortunes of the company have not improved. The staff is unhappy, unproductive and unimpressed by the Human Resource system that currently exists in the company. The pay structure that currently exists within the organisation has been much debated among employees who feel it is unsatisfactory. The Business Adviser will research Performance and Reward management tools in order to help the company develop a more suitable Performance and Reward system to use. A variety of sources will be used in order to evaluate the system and tools against other organisational frameworks. The pay structure within the company will also be looked at in order to identify any possible changes that could be made.
...r investigate what sort of rewards or fringes would their employee’s desire compared to the old method of monetary incentives for the beneficial for the company”.
A number of motivational theories explain how rewards affect the behavior of individuals and teams. Performance related pay can have a motivational effect. Employees are motivated to increase prod...
Incentive reward engagement offers a win-win situation for the employees and the company. Kelleher believes that incentive is a form of recognition and builds engagement through company’s and employee’s obligations towards a common goal (2014). The company has a “Growth Incentive Scheme” for the production workers. Special monetary incentives are provided should the workers achieve the monthly output target. Through the rewards, employees feel motivated towards their work and thus, contribute towards the company’s
Hays, Scott. "Pros & Cons of Pay for Performance." Workforce 78, Number 2 (February 1997): 68-72
...e “ The reward system of the organisation guides the actions that generally have the greatest impact on the motivation and performance of individual employees”. Similarly, Wah (2000) argues that companies which treat their high-performing employees significantly better than those that don't are the best-performing companies around and they reside in the upper quartile of shareholder returns. In addition Lawler (as cited in, Readings In Contemporary Employment Relations, 1998) states that if all the psychological rewards are removed employees will grudgingly remain at work, however if all the financial rewards are removed they would most likely leave.
Meyer, H. H. (1975). The Pay-for-Performance Dilemma. Organizational Dynamics, 3, 39-50. Print. 8 Feb. 2014.
Zingheim, P.K.(2000),’’Rewarding Scarce talent’’. In Berger L.A and the art guide to compensation strategy and design, 4th edition New York. McGraw Hill.
Reichelstein, S. (2000). Providing Managerial Incentives: Cash Flows versus Accrual Accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(2), 243.
Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and