Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
world war 1 social and economic impact
nationalism during world war 2
Globalisation;critically discuss this
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: world war 1 social and economic impact
1914 marked a critical turning point in global affairs and the economy, as the destruction of the Great War not only physically affected millions of people, but it also destroyed the system of global capitalism which existed prior to 1914. During the interwar period, American isolationism from international trade and affairs left the major powers without the infrastructure or leadership to continue the international trade, investment, and currency stabilization which existed before 1914. As a result, the major powers continued their “great power rivalry,” which inhibited global cooperation and resulted in countries adopting nationalist policies to achieve their goal of stable growth and more equitable distribution of wealth (Frieden, 154). After World War Two, the United States emerged as the global leader, and influenced most of the major powers to reorganize their economic policies to promote growth and equality through multinational collaboration, global trade, currency stability, and foreign investments. In both periods, the major powers enacted economic policies to promote stable economic growth and equitable nationwide sharing of the profits from the growth; however, the outcomes were influenced by crucial differences in the levels of United States involvement, economic nationalism, and trade barriers and collaboration.
Before World War I, countries’ economic policies promoted interdependence and global trade. However, the Great War destroyed the financial infrastructure for interdependence which existed prior to 1914, and promoted America into the role of the world’s “financial, commercial, and diplomatic” leader. After the Great War, the “European powers were dependent on the United States . . . to rebuild” (Frieden, 132...
... middle of paper ...
...lism after 1945. Another crucial difference was the role of trade barriers and collaboration. During the interwar period, countries largely used bilateral trade agreements and colonies for trade, and freer trade did not exist. This prompted economic nationalism and internal national development. However, after 1945, most of the Western major powers promoted multi-national trade agreements and collaboration, including involvement in NATO, OECD, IMF, the World Bank, the EEC and ECSC, and the GATT. All of these post-1945 multinational agreements were intended to promote global capitalism and fight communism, and they also helped foster international economic growth and equitable national distribution of profits.
References
Frieden, Jeffry A.. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. 1 ed. New
York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006.
World War I had placed great strains on the economies of the most European nations that were involved in the conflict. With trade agreements with countries like Britain, France and United Kingdom America’s economy flourished, as they forced these countries to accept goods in exchange for debt. The economy of America soared to new heights. America’s abundant natural resources and technological advances were used to become leaders in manufactured exports. (Encl) Usually the general public would opposed big business owners to partner with government, but as the lifestyles of many Americans elevated these relationships were accepted. By the end of the decade, 1910 to 1919, annual incomes rose from $580 to $1300 setting the stage for the “crazy years” known as the “Roaring Twenties”.
During 1940-1970, the USSR and the USA were the world’s leading superpowers. After WW2, it was the US money that helped rebuild nearly all of Western Europe, putting nearly half a dozen countries into debt. They opened trade and helped Europe’s ravaged economy to get back onto its feet. They did so by creating the ‘Marshall Plan’ on June the 5th, 1947. The plans aim was to reconstruct Western Europe and at the same time to stop Communism spreading to them – the Americans were avid believers in the Domino Theory, and believed that communism would take over all of Europe if they did not intervene. They also created other policies such as the Truman doctrine on March the 12th, 1947 (which is a set of principles that state that the US as the worlds ‘leading country’ will help out other democratic governments worldwide) and NATO, 4th of April 1949.
World War I may not have made the world safe for democracy, but it did help to lay the groundwork for a decade of American economic expansion. The war began in Europe in 1914, and the United States entered the fray in 1917. The 1920s saw the growth of the culture of consumerism. A significant reason for United States involvement in the war was the nation’s economic links to the Allied Powers, and especially to Great Britain. American soldiers returned home in May 1919 with the promise of a prosperous decade (Baughman 197).
From 1870-1945, Imperialism, World War I, and the Great Depression had a global impact economically and socially. The effects of Imperialism caused a build of tension between nations as European countries tried to show off their power and prosper economically through the invasion of areas in Africa. In World War I, existing empires were disassembled and new nations emerged as a result. As a result, Woodrow Wilson came up with a new system for controlling threat by creating the League Nations. After World War I, countries turned their economies inward once the Great Depression came and the “domino effect” took its toll on countries around the world.
Capitalism continues to be a revolutionary form of social organization. Modes of production, the ordering of daily activities, and the material practices and processes of social reproduction have undergone numerous changes since capitalism’s inception. Mapping a history of capitalism’s different stages and forms – both social and institutional – would be an arduous task, complicated by the fact that in each of capitalism’s stages, features and characteristics of past and future stages abound. Nevertheless, the current form of capitalism marks a unique departure from previous stages. Euphemisms and catchphrases concerning late 20th century capitalism have become all too common. "Globalization" has become a catchphrase for academics, journalists, and citizens alike. However, many of the claims about a new, distinguishable form of capitalist organization – a "post-Fordist" or "flexible" system of accumulation – are overstated. Despite the dominance of Neoliberalism following the collapse of Fordism, the current epoch does not occasion an economically, environmentally, or socially sustainable regime of accumulation. In this paper I will explain, drawing from the Regulation School, the shift from Fordism to what many have termed "post-Fordism," and use this analysis to suggest future routes for capitalist organization. Indeed, until a socially reproducible compromise to Neo-liberalism is found, aggressive competition and regulatory undercutting will further amplify destructive business cycles, abject poverty, and environmental destruction.
During World War I or the Great War, the Allied Powers fought against the Central Powers, and the United States of America supplied Europe with weapons and technologies. During the beginning of the war, the US engaged in trade and commerce with both alliances. However, as a result of allied blockades and negative public opinion towards the Central Powers, trade with Germany fell to near zero and the destruction of US merchant ships by German U-Boats only worsened trade relations with Germany. Thus, an imbalance of trade with the Allies occurred; as a result, Germany declared its policy of unrestricted submarine warfare. At the time, the Allied Powers loaned enormous amounts of money from US banks. With the Allied Powers standing to lose and the destruction of US merchant ships by the Germans, the US had no choice but to enter the war in order to protect foreign investments or stand to never recover the enormous amount money loaned by the Allied Powers. The US chose the former and entered the war, which resulted in the allies’ victory. World War I marked several significant events: the prosperity of the US economy through trade, the entry of the US into the war for economic interests, and the victory of the Allied Powers over the Central Powers.
...first through a war on drugs, and then a tacit protection of oil interests during Gulf War 1 and veiled protection of US petroleum interests in Gulf War 2. Implicit in public support for both of these wars was the desire to secure continued economic power to protect American interests of an inexpensive (at least monetarily) and high quality of living through control of oil reserves and the acknowledgment that the fates of multinational corporations are directly tied to capitalist American hegemony. The enduring global free trade and protection of American global market security enforcement is a result of efforts by multinational corporations to meet the demands of Americans for cheep products, the needs of industry for cheep supplies. These efforts have lead to free trade conditions that maximize outcomes for industry leaders while satiating the American public.
WWII and the great depression were important economic events during the twentieth century(Tassava-para1). On September 1, 1939, France and Great Britain sent Adolf Hitler an ultimatum either to withdraw German forces from Poland, or they both would go on war against Germany(about education-para 14,15). In spite of the ultimatum, German forces didn’t leave Poland so the war had begun(about education-para 15). The U.S. tried to stay neutral, but supported France, England, and Soviet Union. However, when Pearl Harbor was attacked by Japan, the U.S. decided to join the Allies (France, England, and Russia) and join the war against the Axis Powers (Japan,Germany, and Italy). When the U.S. entered WWII, the Great Depression ended with the explosive spending during times of war(bill,-
In Western Europe, after World War II, there was an economic boom due to the baby boomers and the need to advance the welfare of the countries that were affected by war. This caused a rift between the middle and lower class. Consumerism played an important role in the cultural and political changes after World War II.
WWII has a ripple effect across the globe causing changes both internationally and domestically. Internationally, The sun finally began to set over the British Empire with the majority of her majesties colonial possessions gaining independence in the years following the war. Britain’s stage left exit from its hegemonic role resulted in the start of a new “Great Game” between two burgeoning superpowers. A new world order began to take shape with the United States and USSR vying to establish their own hegemony.
... role on the United States economically, socially, and politically. These three factors, although different in nature were linked; the economic failings in America influenced people into racism and discrimination. In a time where poverty was such a commodity, survival became a higher priority than fairness and equality. During the economic depression, the political leaders were shocked and unsure how to act. This lack of aid to the impoverished population encouraged the people to call for political reform. Despite all of the efforts the United States made to remain detached from Europe, confrontation and international business was inevitable. The resources and wealth that the United States is known for made the country a valuable trading partner and a powerful international figure. Even today the United States is the most powerful and influential country in the world.
The 1920s saw a boom of economic opportunity and featured large scale domestic consumption and relatively new consumer product, which was good for American industry. The First World War, which had brought famine and revolution to some countries, such as Russia and Germany, France and Britain had actually enriched America; when peace came, the Americans found themselves as the economic leaders of the world. America had great amount of natural resources which provided the American industries with the materials they needed to create goods and services in mass quantities. By 1919 other countries owed United States almost twelve thousand million dollars for primary sources and food delivered. America had enormous resources in materials and human labour force and with a wide household market, was ready to take advantage of this situation.
Reich, R. (1991). "The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for twenty-first century capitalism." New York: Alfred Knopf
Realist perspective explains globalization in terms of the relative distribution of power (Nau 2007, 278). In their opinion, trade and economic activities thrives “only under favorable security conditions,” and those conditions rely on the relative distribution of power (Nau 2007, 279). They believe that alliances and hegemony are the two most affirmative security conditions. “’Free trade is more likely within than across political-military alliances; and …alliances have had a much stronger effect on trade in a bipolar than in to a multipolar world.’” (Nau 2007, 279) In other words, the fewer dominating states with power there are in the system, the stronger is the alliance and its effect on trade. In a multipolar world, countries cannot trust each other in trade because alliances are rarely permanent and therefore, countries might use the gains from trade to increase its military power and threaten to cause damage to the other country. Thus, realists argue that,
Shawki, Ahmed, Paul D’Amato (2000), “Briefing: The Shape of World Capitalism,” International Socialist Review, [http://www.isreview.org/issues/11/world_capitalism.shtml], accessed 19 May 2012.