Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of mercantilism in the economy
Mercantilism on the economic spectrum
Importance of mercantilism in the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of mercantilism in the economy
Critically discuss conditionality of IMF loans from the perspective of different IPE theories. There are three IPE (international political economy) that includes, economic national perspective, liberal national perspective and critical perspective. These theories are used to analyze global political economy. Economic national perspective. Economic national perspective strains the importance of the states national interest and understanding actions in global perspective. This perspective is a state- centered theory, thus, it focus mainly on states own interest. Further more, this theory dates back on to the rise and extension nation states in Europe in 15th century. Nevertheless, “mercantilist believed that there was a limited amount of capital in the world and that every nation must focus on its own interest by restricting trade with other nations”. Moreover, this called as “zero-sum game”. “One nations win is another nations loss”. Two well-known devotees of the mercantilist approach were Alexander Hamilton and Fredrick list. “List argued that Germany should industrialize through trade barriers, in order to reach the great economy in the United Kingdom”. Nevertheless, there are also some developed countries that use this approach for a specific reason for instance; the United States used this theory on a specific division. Such as protecting it’s aerospace industry. Thus, there are key actors in economic national perspective; the state is the main actor in international political economy. Therefore, this theory focuses on states rather than individuals (O’Brien and Williams 2013 p.9). However, there are two main statements of this approach, one is that the inter-state system is radical and thus it’s the obligation ... ... middle of paper ... ...nomic difficulties. Countries must solve their economic difficulties in way that it would not affect international economy. Thus, countries should repay the loans plus interest and funds provided by IMF should be used as in the agreements and rules of IMF. Nevertheless, there are different methods that a country must accept before getting financial support from the IMF such prior actions, quantitative performance criteria, indicative targets and structural benchmarks. First, prior actions are procedures that a nation accepts to achieve before IMF’s approval to financial support. For instance, official agreement of the budget to the programs. Second, quantitative performance criteria are special conditions that need to be fulfilled to complete the analysis. Third, indicative targets are expended to enhancement the QPC’s (quantitative performance criteria)
Smith's Influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who bases it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was...
Gaynor Ellis, Elisabeth, and Anthony Esler. ""New Economic Thinking"" World History: The Modern Era. Prentice Hall. 186. Print.
My answer to these two questions is threefold: First, I assert that TSMs and INGOs can and have posed substantial normative challenges to state hegemony, most commonly the notion that the state enjoys a monopoly on representation of its citizens and their interests. Furthermore, TSMs and INGOs that employ the use of violence (particularly terrorism) breach the conventional notion that states...
According to realist view ordering principle of the international system is based on anarchy. There is no higher authority other than the states themselves to check and balance their actions. Consequently, nation-states are the main players in this system. In other words, sovereignty inheres in states, because there is not a higher ruling body in the international system. This is known as state centrism. Survival is an obligation continuing to be sovereign. On the other hand, sovereignty is the characteristic feature of states and its meaning is strongly tied to use of force. According to the most of the realist variants, states are “black boxes”; the determinative factor is states’ observable behavior, not their leaders’ characteristics, their decision making processes or their government systems.
The realist perspective on international political economy can be seen in the United States international trade policy with China. The United States being an established world power seeks to further enhance its international role by engaging in trade with another nation, that being China, this reflects the realist main idea that the state occupies center stage in global political affairs.
Gilpin, Robert. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. Print.
Balaam, David. Introduction to International Political Economy, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Education, 2005.
...t state autonomy cannot be restricted by anything but the community (state) itself. As one might assume, it follows from these differing standpoints that the way each theory view intervention, etc., will be in opposition. (Steve Smith, The Globalisation of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations p. 173A)
the effect that the work of the IMF and the World Bank have had on the
O'Brien, R. W. (2010). Approaches to Global Political Economy. In R. O'Brien, & M. Wlilliams, Global Political Economy (pp. 17-24). Palgrave Macmillan.
“The process of globalization and the increasing role of non-state actors in global governance are undermining the role of the state as the principal actor in global policymaking.”
Theories of international relations have allowed people to make sense of the world around them. The study of international relations is an attempt to explain relationships between the states, which is necessary due to the increase in globalization and actors involved. A majority of IR-theory focuses on the materialist aspects of world affairs, such as military forces and economic capabilities to define the behavior of the states. The Constructivism theory however, focuses on human awareness claiming that international relations are socially constructed rather than materialistically constructed (Beinur, 2011, p. 115). The theory of Constructivism best describes international relations because it is not a physical entity or material object. To understand the interactions of the states, you must focus the shared understandings that inform the actors on the international scene.
Politics is greatly influenced by the economies since they all aim at protecting and amassing more wealth (Giddens 2009). The countries with the greatest economies in the world are also the most powerful politically. Therefore, globalization being an important element in the global economy controls the nation-states and the international politics as a whole (Ritzer 2010). Globalization has made impossible for any nation-state to control the forces of the economies, but they have to align themselves to the trends in the global economics. In the traditional way, politics were confined to the national polit...
The international system is an anarchical system which means that, unlike the states, there is no over ruling, governing body that enforces laws and regulations that all states must abide by. The International System in today’s society has become highly influential from a number of significant factors. Some of these factors that will be discussed are Power held by the state, major Wars that have been fought out in recent history and international organisations such as the U.N, NATO and the W.T.O. Each of these factors, have a great influence over the international system and as a result, the states abilities to “freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development”.
During the final phases of World War II, it became evident that the structure of the world economy would take on a new shape. The reconfiguration of this realm was a direct result of a bi-polarized international power structure and to a moderate extent caused by the birth of third world nation states (Briscoe 2009). The ideological differences shared by the United States and the Soviet Union, and the desire to shoehorn their political ideals elsewhere, made the political and economic development of these newly independent states a subject of contestation amongst various schools of thought. The three dominant theories that explain the determinants of economic development list as followed: the modernization theory, suggesting that liberalization and democracy are the most pivotal components for economic development; the dependency theory, declaring that emerging nations should solely depend on the exportation of primary goods and import substitution industrialization; and the state-led developmental theory, encouraging state interventionism to ultimately reach export led growth (Arat 1988; Hein 1992; Reny 2011). Although each theory suggests contrasting economic approaches, the role that a state plays in the developmental phase has always been a central variable in each school of thought; nevertheless, questions concerning the states’ degree of intervention have been subject to various permutations.