Different Types of Carbon Emission Schemes

2016 Words5 Pages

1. Introduction:
Carbon emission trading schemes (ETS) have been implemented all over the world as a means to limit the production of greenhouse gases (GHGs). There currently exists an extensive variety of these carbon trading schemes, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. ETS have been used for other air pollutants prior to their application to greenhouse gases. Emissions credit trading in the United States has existed since 1977. (Tietenburg et al. 1998, 6)
One of the world’s largest and most successful ETS, was established in 1990 under the Acid Rain program of the United States Clear Air Act amendments. (Tietenburg et al. 1998, 6) The Acid Rain program differed from its predecessors in that it was a cap-and-trade program and, as a result, yielded far more success.
The first Carbon ETS was implemented by the BP Corporation, which looked into the idea internally to reduce its own emissions and implemented it in 1998. (Betsill & Hoffman 2011, 90) The negotiations at Kyoto in 1997 also set the framework for an international ETS that was truly global in its scale, though it would not be implemented until 2008. After the Kyoto negotiations and the implementation of its own ETS, many other countries and private firms began to explore their own ETS. In 1998, Shell, Norway, Canada, New South Wales in Australia, and the United Kingdom all began initial discussions on implementing cap-and-trade GHG ETS. (Betsill & Hoffman 2011, 90)
As of 2009, thirteen ETS have reached the trading phase of their implementation. (Betsill & Hoffman 201, 93) They include the BP ETS (implemented 1998), Kyoto Protocol ETS (2008), Shell ETS (2002), United Kingdom ETS (2001), Norway ETS (2005), New South Wales ETS (2003), Denmark ETS (2000), European...

... middle of paper ...

...l Emissions Trading.” Date accessed April 14. http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/mechanisms/emissions_trading/items/2731.php

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Final Confidentiality Determinations for New or Substantially Revised Data Elements. Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/documents/pdf/2013/documents/2013-data-elements.pdf

Voreacos, David and Justin Doom. 2014. “Christie Greenhouse Changes Violate N.J. Law, Court Says.” Bloomberg. Last modified March 26. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-25/new-jersey-ordered-by-court-to-repeal-or-amend-pollution-rules.html

Western Climate Initiative. 2010. “Updated Economic Analysis of the WCI Regional Cap and Trade Program.” Western Climate Initiative. http://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/remository/func-startdown/265/

More about Different Types of Carbon Emission Schemes

Open Document