Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
prokaryotic vs eukaryotic
difference of prokaryotes and eukaryotes
difference in prokaryotes to eukaryotes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: prokaryotic vs eukaryotic
Introduction Bioinformatics based tools are essential to the design of experiments in the post-genomic age. They allow scientists to manipulate the large datasets gained from genome sequencing efforts to identify potential research targets; analyse target sequences to predict protein characteristics; and to share annotated data through simple, on demand interfaces. This gives researchers more information to use when creating a hypothesis, which saves time and money that would have been spent of failed experiments. Informed use of these tools is required to avoid false-positive and negative results. This requires knowledge of the tools limits, parameter adjustments and biological considerations to ensure a confident hypothesis when using bioinformatics. Additionally, strong fundamental knowledge of these techniques will increase their accuracy and efficiency, leading to better initial experiments. An important biological consideration that dictates which bioinformatics tools should be used is whether sequence data is taken from a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism. Many tools will have options to select what classification your sequence comes from and some will only work with a certain classification. This is because there are major differences in the organisation and processing of genetic information between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, only certain differences between the two classifications are important; depending on what data you’re analysing and what information you hope to extract. This creates two stages of analysis take that place during experimental design using bioinformatics tools. These are gene finding and gene function prediction; together, they can identify potential targets for research and elicit imp... ... middle of paper ... ...d to consider these differences when identifying genes and predicting their function. Prokaryotic genomes also possess synteny, which makes comparative genomics a useful tool in identifying small genes that would be overlooked in more stringent gene finding tools such as ORF scanning. Predicting gene function revolves around predicting protein localisation and defining conserved functional domains. These are both dependant on whether the target sequence is prokaryotic or eukaryotic in origin, as different signalling peptides, possibilities for localisation and useful domains exist for each classification. However, gene expression data has been overlooked as a method of functional analysis as analysis of either classification follows a similar method. Gene expression data is useful as it further narrows the ambiguity of protein function to specific cellular events.
Tyson, Michael. "Result Filters." National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 15 May 2011. Web. 08 Apr. 2014.
1) To identify all possible genes in the region and most importantly to check whether there are genes mis- or incorrectly-annotated using sequence analyses
In conclusion, the above comparison draws out few facts that should be taken into account for a better understanding of the genomes of the two organizations. Above all, the fact that the eukaryotes show similarities to prokaryotes could mean that they derived from prokaryotes initially, and then became more complex as they advanced. This fact also supports the Endosymbiosis theory. And the eukaryotic genomes are larger and more repetitive, which makes them less productive than the prokaryotic genes. But considering by the quantity of the genes, eukaryotes are effective. In the perspective of expression, the complex eukaryotes have to go through physical borders and take more time and energy to express its genes. Due to the simplicity of the prokaryotes, their genomes highly efficient much more simple and they are stronger than what people think.
Proteogenomics is a kind of science field that includes proteomics and genomics. Proteomic consists of protein sequence information and genomic consists of genome sequence information. It is used to annotate whole genome and protein coding genes. Proteomic data provides genome analysis by showing genome annotation and using of peptides that is gained from expressed proteins and it can be used to correct coding regions.Identities of protein coding regions in terms of function and sequence is more important than nucleotide sequences because protein coding genes have more function in a cell than other nucleotide sequences. Genome annotation process includes all experimental and computational stages.These stages can be identification of a gene ,function and structure of a gene and coding region locations.To carry out these processes, ab initio gene prediction methods can be used to predict exon and splice sites. Annotation of protein coding genes is very time consuming process ,therefore gene prediction methods are used for genome annotations. Some web site programs provides these genome annotations such as NCBI and Ensembl. These tools shows sequenced genomes and gives more accurate gene annotations. However, these tools may not explain the presence of a protein. Main idea of proteogenomic methods is to identify peptides in samples by using these tools and also with the help of mass spectrometry.Mass spectrometry searches translation of genome sequences rather than protein database searching. This method also annotate protein protein interactions.MS/MS data searching against translation of genome can determine and identify peptide sequences.Thus genome data can be understood by using genomic and transcriptomic information with this proteogenomic methods and tools. Many of proteomic information can be achieved by gene prediction algorithms, cDNA sequences and comparative genomics. Large proteomic datasets can be gained by peptide mass spectrophotometry for proteogenomics because it uses proteomic data to annotate genome. If there is genome sequence data for an organism or closely related genomes are present,proteogenomic tools can be used. Gained proteogenomic data provides comparing of these data between many related species and shows homology relationships among many species proteins to make annotations with high accuracy.From these studies, proteogenomic data demonstrates frame shifts regions, gene start sites and exon and intron boundaries , alternative splicing sites and its detection , proteolytic sites that is found in proteins, prediction of genes and post translational modification sites for protein.
The ultimate goal of pharmacogenomics, as stated by Henig, “would be for everyone’s genome to be analyzed indi...
Transcription factors allow cells to perform logic operations and combine different sources of information to "decide" whether to express a gene.
Presently, computers are being used to hold the vast databases of all the sequencing information for every gene of the human DNA strand. If computers were not available, the paper needed to contain all this information would stack higher than the Washington Monument, over 555 feet high. And this would only be for the data, not the analysis of that data. Imagine the nightmare of trying to find the correct gene pair, there are over 3.2 billion of them, in all that paper. But providing a database for the sequencing information of the human genome is only one way in which computers are helping in the mapping of the human genome. They also provide the computational power needed to speed the calculations for each gene as well as producing maps and the such for genetic information on each chromosome (Smith 14). In fact, Compaq Computer Corporation built specific technology enabling completion of the Human Genome.
Other disadvantages of these traditional methods include their lack of reproducibility and the difficulties they produce in typing as they are usually not sensitive enough for strain differentiation. These techniques are also restricted by the number of organisms present and the skill of the microbiologist in recognising different pathogens (Tang et al., 1997). Over the past few decades, the development and introduction of molecular-based techniques into the labora...
1. Expression of genome information: I would expect to find the protein helicase in the 41% of the genes that function as expression of genome information. I believe helicase would be present because is a protein needed in order for single strand of DNA to be copied. It uses hydrolysis at the replication fork to unwind the DNA from its double helix structure to make it possible to copy the single strand. This is very important for gene expression.
Genomic sequencing is the process of determining the precise order of nucleotides within a DNA molecule. It includes any method or technology that is used to determine the order of the four DNA bases – thiamine, adenine, guanine, and cytosine– in the strand of DNA (NHGRI, 2011). In each organism, these bases are arranged in a unique and specific sequence, and it is this sequence that is the genetic code of the organism. Genomic sequencing has had an impact on nearly every field of biological research including human genetics and genomics, plants and agriculture, microbes, medicine, viruses and infectious diseases, environmental genetics and evolutionary biology. By first examining the development of gene sequencing technology we will be able to view its role in evolutionary biology, its contribution to phylogenetics, and how it has changed our understanding of the biological tree of life.
To this end, you can enter the name of a gene (e.g. TGFB1I1) in the field of Genetic Association to retrieve all related functional SNPs. You can use the Multi-tissue eQTL comparison to consider the functional impact of indicated SNP in all tissues. In figure 3 you can see the example result for the functional impact of rs4889661 in TGFB1I1.
...ng RNAseq data and different measures of expression similarities. The pairwise comparisons of expression profiles reveal higher similarity between orthologs than between within-species paralogs and between-species paralogs. This study also validates the presence of background noise in expression data when a correlation coefficient is used as measure of expression similarity. However this study can be considered redundant and simplified as it only validates previous findings of Chen and Zhang using similar approaches on same type of data. This study and the studies of Altenhoff et al. and Chen and Zhang are not final proofs for ortholog conjecture. Gene expression data serves only as a proxy for gene function while GO annotations are incomplete and have biases and errors. Hence further studies using complete functional data is necessary to prove ortholog conjecture.
Phenotypic methods of classifying microorganisms describe the diversity of bacterial species by naming and grouping organisms based on similarities. The differences between Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryotes are basic. Bacteria can function and reproduce as single cells but often combine into multicellular colonies. Bacteria are also surrounded by a cell wall. Archaea differ from bacteria in their genetics and biochemistry. Their cell membranes are made with different material than bacteria. Just like bacteria, archaea are also single cell and are surrounded by a cell wall. Eukaryotes, unlike bacteria and archaea, contain a nucleus. And like bacteria and archaea, eukaryotes have a cell wall. The Gram stain is a system used to characterize bacteria based on the structural characteristics of their cell walls. A Gram-positive cell will stain purple if cell walls are thick and a Gram-negative cell wall appears pink. Most bacteria can be classified as belonging to one of four groups (Gram-positive cocci, Gram-positive bacilli, Gram-negative cocci, and Gram-negative bacilli) (Phenotypic analysis. (n.d.).
In order to build something, you must know everything about it. Therefore, in order to synthesize artificial human genes, scientists must first know or learn everything about them. To meet this requirement, a very large amount of research must be done; therefore, resulting in many new groundbreaking discoveries. Understanding how something works, also means understanding what does not work about it. These discoveries could be invaluable to treating illnesses and diseases; furthermore, it could also provide the means to a multitude of
Distinct characteristics are not only an end result of the DNA sequence but also of the cell’s internal system of expression orchestrated by different proteins and RNAs present at a given time. DNA encodes for many possible characteristics, but different types of RNA aided by specialized proteins sometimes with external signals express the needed genes. Control of gene expression is of vital importance for an eukaryote’s survival such as the ability of switching genes on/off in accordance with the changes in the environment (Campbell and Reece, 2008). Of a cell’s entire genome, only 15% will be expressed, and in multicellular organisms the genes active will vary according to their specialization. (Fletcher, Ivor & Winter, 2007).