The Deceiving Power of God

955 Words2 Pages

In Meditations III, one of the six meditations in his book Meditation, Objections, and Replies, René Descartes acknowledges the existence of God. Descartes says, “Indeed I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is, God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists.”(28) Descartes believes that he did not come into existence by himself, but some higher being, God, had to be in existence already and had to create Descartes. I agree with Descartes’s reasoning of God’s existence. But then as Descartes continues his ideas into the fourth meditation, he begins to discuss how God is a perfect being. Descartes says, “To begin with, I acknowledge that it is impossible for God ever to deceive me, for trickery or deception are always indicative of some imperfection.”(30) Deception is seen as an imperfection. And since God is a perfect being, deception is not a part of Him. This is where I do not agree with Descartes’ knowledge and reason. I believe that God does have the power of deception and that God uses it. In this paper I will argue that God is not the perfect being that Descartes argues He is since there are instances in which God displays His deceitful tendencies. I will provide two examples of how God is deceptive. Descartes, however has made certain points in his meditation that he feels like strengthens his ideas of God not being a deceiver. Keeping his ideas in mind, I will discuss a possible way in which Descartes would reply to my objection against his ideas.

The first argument I will make concerns the way God has deceived people into doing things He wants them to do. Descartes states “Accord-ingly, deception is incompatible with God....

... middle of paper ...

...However, it is not God’s fault that our perception is deceiving us. He would say that when we see mirages, it is not in fact God that is deceiving us, it is nature itself. If our perception of something is wrong, then it is nature’s fault that we perceive it like that, not God’s.

In conclusion, Descartes’s argument for a non-deceptive God can be valid. But based off my examples, I have shown that there are flaws in Descartes’s ideas. My first example of showing that God deceived Abraham into almost killing his son shows that God can deceive us for his own purposes, whether those purposes are good or not. My second example involving our perception also shows that God can deceive us, whether he is deceiving us intentionally or unintentionally. Overall, Descartes argument is strong, but if he were to provide solid examples for his ideas, then they would be stronger.

Open Document