Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors influencing capital structure decision
Capital Structure Decisions
Capital Structure Decisions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors influencing capital structure decision
Determining the Debt-Equity Mix
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is an essential percentage used in determining a suitable debt-equity mixture within a firm's capital structure. El Café, a fictitious business, was used in a simulation as a primary example for determining feasible methods of financing for proposed franchise expansions. El Café was faced with three major decisions in which the WACC was used as a benchmark to select the most appropriate form of financing based on the company's existing capital structure. In today's world of business, real companies are faced with similar decisions, and they must be cognizant of the significance of utilizing the WACC figure before making final investment or financing decisions. The WACC can push companies to the brink of bankruptcy or prime them for increased profitability and return on investments. This summary will incorporate a simulation example to serve as an illustration of the benefits of using the WACC to assist in the decision-making process that deals with capital structure.
Year 2001 proposed light expansion opportunities for El Café, a small coffee house. The debt-equity mixture was set to seventy percent debt and thirty percent equity. This decision was made based on the fact that debt costs less than equity; thus, this decision allowed the owner to minimize the WACC to 8.65% for the $400,000 venture. Year 2004 afforded further expansion possibilities. With all expansion and financing options considered, a 7-city expansion financed solely by debt proved to be the best option. This option allowed for the highest rate of return over the WACC. This is very important because the WACC acts as a discount rate for gauging subsequent cash flow amounts (Brealey et al., 2004, p. 321).
Year 2005 called for quick action to rebalance the capital structure of El Café, which was in financial peril. To accomplish this financial rebound, the proportion of debt was lowered to reflect El Café's initial capital structure of seventy percent debt, placing debt closely at 63.42%. This feat was accomplished by selling real estate and vehicles. These assets were not necessary to the operation of El Café. The owner also chose to forego debt renegotiation because that option was only temporary; furthermore, it would also raise interest rates and the WACC. It was for this reason that renegotiation was rejected; consequently, the WACC was lowered to 10.07%, bringing El Café back to its feet.
WACC is pivotal to an organization's financial success.
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
In SIVMED’s case, based on the definition of WACC, all capital bases should be included in its WACC. These include its common stock, preferred stock, bonds and long-term borrowings. In addition to being able to compute for the costs of capital, the WACC also determines how much interest SIVMED has to pay for all its activities. The value of the firm’s stock, which we want to maximize, depends of the after-tax cash flow. Hence, after-tax values for WACC are also needed. Furthermore, cost of capital is used to determine the cost of each debt, stock or common equity. Being able to analyze these will be essential into deciding what and how new capital should be acquired. Hence, the present marginal costs are ideally more essential than historical costs.
Based on the optimal capital structure analysis, they should pursue as 70% debt proportion, which will give them the lowest cost of capital at 11.58%. Currently Star has no debt in their capital structure, so these new projects should begin to add debt to the company. However, no matter what debt and equity proportions are chosen for each project, the discount rate of 11.58% should be used, as the capital budgeting decisions should be independ...
MCI current capital structure is x% debt and y% equity. Their key ratios are a, b, and c. Comparing to other firms in the utilities industry they appear to be underutilizing (debt/equity). (See exhibit D). Referencing the forecast there is expected to b...
DuPont has been known for its low reliance on borrowings. In the 1970’s, the company had to assume a substantial portion of debt of Conoco, a newly acquired company. In 1983, the managers have to decide about the future optimal target debt ratio. Should the company continue to keep about 40% of its assets financed via debt or should it strive to lower its borrowings to 25%?
Tim’s Coffee Shoppe is a well established business that has been running as a sole proprietorship for over 30 years. The business needs to improve on its management strategy in order to perform optimally in its present environment. The purpose of this paper is to provide the owner Tim with suggested improvements on managing the human as well as financial resources of the coffee shop so as to remain competitive and increase profits. The Coffee house is conveniently located close to several metro stations, ensuring a steady flow of traffic. It is also situated near a University, presenting the business with a steady clientele of college students. The business is facing stiff competition from Queequeg’s coffee with 7 shops located near Tim’s. However, the restaurant seems able to hold on to its market share judging from the reported sales revenue of $ 400,000, and increasing sales. The Shoppe recently underwent a remodeling of its interiors and exteriors, and has purchased several new equipment including computers and a freezer. Tim’s is however facing challenges in staff management.
In assessing Du Pont’s capital structure after the Conoco merger that significantly increased the company’s debt to equity ratio, an analyst must look at all benefits and drawbacks of a high debt ratio. The main reason why Du Pont ended up with a high debt to equity ratio after acquiring Conoco was due to the timing and price at which they bought Conoco. Du Pont ended up buying the firm at its peak, just before coal and oil prices started to fall and at a time when economic recession hurt the chemical industry of Du Pont. The additional response from analysts and Du Pont stockholders also forced Du Pont to think twice about their new expansion. The thought of bringing the debt ratio back to 25% was brought on by the fact that the company saw that high levels of capital spending were vital to the success of the firm and that high debt levels may put them at higher risk for defaulting.
There is no universal theory of the debt-equity choice, and no reason to expect one. In this essay I will critically assess the Pecking Order Theory of capital structure with reference and comparison of publicly listed companies. The pecking order theory says that the firm will borrow, rather than issuing equity, when internal cash flow is not sufficient to fund capital expenditures. This theory explains why firms prefer internal rather than external financing which is due to adverse selection, asymmetry of information, and agency costs (Frank & Goyal, 2003). The trade-off theory comes from the pecking order theory it is an unintentional outcome of companies following the pecking-order theory. This explains that firms strive to achieve an optimal capital structure by using a mixture debt and equity known to act as an advantage leverage. Modigliani and Miller (1958) showed that the decisions firms make when choosing between debt and equity financing has no material effects on the value of the firm or on the cost or availability of capital. They assumed perfect and frictionless capital markets, in which financial innovation would quickly extinguish any deviation from their predicted equilibrium.
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
Each competitor 's current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio are able to be found in this exhibit for the year ended in 2015. McDonald’s currently has a cash ratio of 0.76, a quick ratio of 1.20, and a 1.52. Starbucks has a cash ratio of 0.44, a quick ratio of 0.64, and a current ratio of 1.19. Finally, the Dunkin Brand Group Inc. has a cash ratio of 0.59, a quick ratio of 0.74, and a current ratio of 1.25. When looking at these ratios one is able to find that compared to its competitors, Starbucks is less liquid than McDonald 's and Dunkin Brand Group
There was a trend in rise of the net property & equipment related assets since 2002 to 2004. This boost in net property and equipment assets was related to the acquisition strategy conducted by Applebee’s. For the $34 millions acquisitions of 21 restaurants in Washington D.C. area on November 7, 2002; $24 millions has been allocated to the fair value of property and equipment plus $10 millions in goodwill. This has caused a jump in net property & equipment assets for 2002 to jumped 16% and Intangibles assets to jumped 12% when compared to 2001. Since most of the purchased are by cash, this has caused a 31% decreased in the Cash & Equivalents for Applebee’s balance sheet. For the 11 Applebee’s restaurants acquisitions in Illinois, Indianan, Kentucky, and Missouri for $21.8 million on March 24, 2003, $7.9 millions were allocated to the fair value of property and equipment, the other $16.6 millions went to goodwill, plus a net liabilities in additions of $1.3...
For one of my selections for buying stock, I invested into Starbucks, this company has attracted me with their wonders of different coffees, and I knew many others were interested in the very popular coffee company. Starbucks all started 1971 in Seattle Washington. With three men which were Jerry Baldwin, Zev Siegel and Gordon Bowker each of them put in one thousand three hundred and fifty dollars along with a barrowed five thousand from the bank to start up there small coffee shop in pick place market, witch is located in down town Seattle. The name for this company was inspired from the character Starbuck from Moby Dick; this character was a coffee lover. There close friend designed there well known logo. These men never thought of this small company to get large they just thought of it as a small coffee shop. Out of all three men Siegel was the only one that work at it full time. The men depened on a man named Alfred Peet for there coffee beans but soon then started there own blends of coffee beans. With in a year opening the first store they were able to open a second store. When the 1980’s rolled around, it was a thriving company, in the Seattle area. However, the co-founders began to have other interests and were involved in other careers simultaneously. Despite that, the company was about to undergo a major turning point. A man by the name of Howard Schultz started to pursue an interest in the company. He noticed that the coffee shop had a wonderful environment. He started asking a questions and becoming more and more interested by every moment. He loved how the founders had so much knowledge on the coffee and each blend. In 1982, Schultz became director of retail operation. This was just the start to a new phase with the company.
There is a range of criteria relevant for a decision of financing a new venture. To construct my list for the evaluation of a new company as an opportunity I have selected to refer to t...
Firstly, in assessing ourselves, we determined that our BATNA associated with $37 million. I comprised the cost of building a new plant ($25 million), loss of profits in 12 months ($12 million) and the cost of 90 day option to buy land ($0.5 million). A non-refundable expense of $10 million on buying the option for the land is considered the sunk cost. The maximum amount of money that our group could spend on this buying intention is $40 million. We decided that our target point would be $16 m...
a. 1. What sources of capital should be included when you estimate Harry Davis’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?