Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
crisis communication plan case study report
emergency and crisis response plan
implementing crisis management plan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: crisis communication plan case study report
A Product-Harm Crisis can mean the end of a corporation. A Product-Harm Crisis (although considered to be low in probability of occurring), may have severe consequences for a company if not handled properly. For this reason, potential risks associated with a product should be monitored on a continual basis. So much that - without warning, a Product- Harm Crisis can progress into a catastrophic incident that can quickly destroy a business’ future. Since, crises are often difficult to anticipate and prevent (Vassilikopoulou, Lepetsos, Siomkos, Chatzipanagiotou, 2008). Indeed, a Crisis Communication Management Plan is necessary, as it assists in monitoring and detecting potential risks associated with a product. Equally important is that a Crisis Communication Management Plan includes a strategic communication –blue print- crucial in a Product- Harm Crisis incident. And so, the goal of this paper is to explain factors contributing to a Product-Harm Crisis and how a Crisis Management Plan is effective in the first phase of a Product-Harm Crisis incident.
Once a product is found to be malfunctioning with the potential of causing injury or death to a consumer, is when a Product- Harm Crisis has occurred. For instance, there are a few categorized instances that can define a Product- Harm Crisis. For example, natural disaster, workplace violence, rumors, malevolence, challenges, technical errors and, human error (W. T. Coombs, 2012) are just a few examples of crisis. Regardless of the threat, a crisis can indiscriminately post a substantial risk to a company’s reputation, credibility, consumer trust and financial future.
Pursuing this further- Vassilikopoulou, Lepetsos, Siomkos and Chatzipanagiotou (2009) mention four disti...
... middle of paper ...
... altogether by implementing very meticulous business processes with sufficient “checks and balances” and to react in a felicitous fashion when, despite all precautions a product crisis occurs which imperils the health of the firms customers, (p. ).
In exploring the components included in a Product-Harm Crisis and the suggested strategies in the production of a Crisis Communication Management Plan, recommended that while a Product- Harm Crisis is accepted to have a low likelihood of happening, it can advance into an emergency that might be damaging to a brand. A Crisis Management Plan turned out to be important in such a pressing position as a Product-Harm Crisis event, on the grounds that a Crisis Management Plan frameworks particular systems and strategies that will help in managing media, consumer concerns, brand, recall process (if pertinent), and so on.
crisis did hurt the company but their response was quickly active, they went directly to the media
The Consumer Product Safety Committee was mandated with the responsibility of safeguarding the public from unreasonable risks of harm or death linked with the use of various types of products under the agency’s jurisdiction. In case of violation of a mandatory regulation, the agency usually issues a Letter of Advice regarding the infringement and the nature of appropriate corrective action. The violation is also accompanied by a product recall by the respective company and liability for negligence for any injury or death from using the product. Some of the major aspects under consideration during a product recall include duty of care, actual causation, standard of care, proximate causation, breach of the duty of care, actual injury, and defenses to negligence.
The company should be honest and acknowledge that they have made a mistake. On all interviews the company should express sympathy and regret for those affected and immediately promise that the company will pay all medical costs associated with the crisis. The company should also say the latest news on the crisis and ensure the public that the company has a handle on the problem. Listing places customers can ask questions and seek help about problems related to the crisis can be very appreciated by the customers knowing that the company cares about them.
The Chipotle organization was immediately faced with a public relations challenge. The organizations identified the crisis and 1st came up with a goal. Crisis Management (Lecture 1-2) Address the e coli outbreak in a way that is as aggressive as the media coverage that had reported on the events. The purpose of the plan, to take ownership of the incidents, be responsible for fixing it and regain as much consumer trust as possible. The final goal to bring their sales revenue back up.
In an ideal world, consumers and companies would equally share the burdens of product liability and consumer responsibility. However, in the real world, we must make tradeoffs between these two. How we do this will not only affect our legal environment, but our economic and social environments as well.
There are many definitions for what is considered to be a crisis. Alan Jay Zaremba, author of the textbook ”Organizational Communication,” combines several definitions of the word to conclude that a crisis is “an incident that occurs unexpectedly, could damage an organization’s reputation, values, and/or performance, and requires effective communication. (Zaremba, 2010) In the case of the Nuance Group, their current situation completely blindsided the organization, was a nightmare for their reputation, and communication was now the key element in restoring their image. This was indeed a crisis.
In this case, the consequences of secrecy approach fits well. The company knew about the problem before the product came out into the market. However, they did not make it public. Of course, it would have been hard to say that this car might get on fire while you are driving because of the some design problem. Therefore, the company kept it secret from the public. As a result, it was too late when the problem found out and some people have already lost their
There have been many products that have caused major damages to consumers because of the poor quality that they were made in or due to unaware circumstances that the company producing the it...
There are six elements, or requirements, for a cause of action in strict product liability and these elements are the following: the product must have been in defective condition when sold, the part selling the item must normally be engaged in the business of selling or otherwise distributing the product, the product must be unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer due to the defective condition, the user or consumer must have incurred physical harm to self or property by the use or consumption of the product, the defective condition must be the proximate cause of the injury or damage, and the goods must not have been substantially changed from the time the product was sold to the time the injury or damage was
This Coca Cola malfunction incident demonstrates that if attention is not paid to the ethical operation or the company it could challenge and threaten a company’s short and long term performance. This could have long lasting affects on the companies operations and requires strategic decisions to restore company’s image in the eyes of the customers. Gaining the trust of customers takes long time but it is broken with one small incident.
A product is said to be defective if the safety of the product is not such as a person is generally entitled to expect . A defect could be either in the form of design defect , manufactured defect or instructional defect . The persons who shall be liable for any damage caused either wholly or partly by a defect in a product is held out by Section 68(1) of CPA as follows: (a) producer of the product; (b) the person who, by putting his name or trade mark on the product, has
..., Crisis communication failures: The BP Case Study, International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, Issue 2, March-April 2013, accessed 28 March 2014,
According to David Abrahams, senior vice-president of Marsh Risk Consulting Practice and an expert in brand risk, there is often a demonstrable link between the way in which a crisis is handled by a company and what happens to that business and its associated brand. 'The way in which any crisis is handled becomes a visible test of management capability,' he says. 'If that crisis arises from a fundamental breach of trust or performance, the compound effect of the bad handling can be devastating.'
Basically, the concepts of risk communication are partially aligned with the ideology of three-stage process of the model in terms of crisis communication and issue management. For instance, a Hong Kong famous beverages manufacturer, VITASOY, has raised public concerns of the taste deviation of Lemon Tea product in February 2014. In response to this crisis, VITASOY has published a media statement to the key stakeholders including customers, media and the retailers. ...
The communication process is not something that begins when a crisis rears its ugly head rather it is a process that takes place in preparing for a crisis before it happens. While the term crisis represents a blanket term used to describe many situations, each situation is unique, thus presenting different obstacles to overcome. However, with a well-established advanced plan in place an organization places itself in a position to overcome and work around obstacles. The development of a comprehensive crisis management plan is one achieved through effective communication where each member of the crisis management team has an advanced shared understanding of his or her role and responsibility during a time of crisis (du Pr'e, 2005).