Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
charles darwin origin of species essay
charles darwin origin of species essay
eugenics and human genetics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: charles darwin origin of species essay
The publication of Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species in 1859 had far reaching consequences. One of the most important notions in his ground-breaking book was the claim that no species is fixed. Rather “a well marked variety may .... well be called an incipient species,” demonstrating that nature is not static but a continuum where varieties beget species. Assuming that man was a part of nature, a concept many scientists had come to accept, this principle could be extended to include human societies. Thus, by applying the principles of evolution, human stock could be manipulated and improved. Evolutionary principles were also applied to justify particular ideologies and human social organisations. Traditionally, Social Darwinism was defined in narrow terms, as a right-wing view. Modern historians have revised this view, claiming Social Darwinism encompasses a larger range of ideologies and evolutionary doctrines. Social Darwinists used evolution to justify laissez-faire capitalism, but not to the extent that traditional historians imply. Eugenics was a radical application of evolutionary principles to society, trying to build a ‘fitter’ race through direct measures. But Social Darwinism did not have the major influence on imperialism, militarism and nationalism which has been ascribed to it. Socialists were particularly taken by evolution, and far from it being self-defeating, Social Darwinism was used as a justification for socialism as a more evolved society. Darwin himself appeared to be a Social Darwinist, viewing society in terms of his own doctrine, judging from his writings.
Social Darwinism is difficult to define, as it encapsulates a number of concepts. Traditionally it has been viewed as a right wing phenomeno...
... middle of paper ...
... Doctrine." In Economic and Political Weekly 39, No. 35 (2003): …
Perry, Marvin. et al. Western Civilisation: Ideas, Politics and Society. 7th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2004.
Pichot, Andre. The Pure Society: From Darwin to Hitler. London, UK: Verso, 2009.
Spencer, Herbert. Social Statistics: or, The Conditions Essential to Happiness Specified, and the First of them Developed. 1st ed. London: John Chapman, 1851.
Tucker, Aviezer. A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2009.
Turda, Marius. Modernism and Eugenics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Weikart, Richard. From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics and Racism in Germany. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Weikart, Richard. "A Recently Discovered Darwin Letter on Social Darwinism." In Isis 86, No.4, (1995): 609-611
Tindall, George Brown, and David Emory Shi. America: A Narrative History. New York: W.W. Norton Co., 1997.
Anthropologists, who study humans and their origins, generally accept that the human species can be categorized into races based on physical and genetic makeup. For example, many slaves had physical differences from their counterpart white race, such as dark skin and wiry hair. Throughout history, the study of Sociology has had a significant impacted the `nature versus nurture' debate. Social Darwinism based its theory on genetic determinism and natural selection, advocating a capitalist economy, promoting racism and the inherent inequality of such as society. Karl Marx, also an advocate for capitalism and slavery, applied the Marxist philosophy to the practice of science, emphasizing environmental influences determined behavior. Max Weber is known his ...
Henretta, James A., and David Brody. America a Concise History. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2010.
"Social Darwinism." Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2014. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
Darwin’s theory on Origin of Species is crucial in understanding Bellamy’s novel because Bellamy critiques what is expressed in Darwin’s theory. Bellamy reflects the Utopian critique of social Darwinism where he tries to come up with positive alternatives in relevance to the Capitalist ethics of greed and Darwinian struggle for survival (Bellamy 4-26). The novel reflects future America where evolutionary love will operate without struggle for materials. These products focused in the utopian imagination were ridiculed by the social Darwinists. Bellamy’s novel downplays struggle for the fittest by encouraging evolutionary love and emphasizing on the role of cooperative human culture in evolutionary development. Therefore, while Bellamy tries to come up with a better world, Cha...
The origins of eugenic ideology can be traced to the mid-nineteenth century when English philosopher, Herbert Spencer coined the term "survival of the fittest." Those strong and "fittest" would naturally rise to the top, for the benefit of society. Spencer, along with other leading scientists like Charles Darwin and Gregor Mendel advocated the principles of the improvement of the human race based on this superiority logic; supporting their findings through the combined applications of science and mathematics. In 1865, statistician Francis J. Galton "postulated that heredity not only transmitted physical features, such as hair color and height, but mental, emotional and creative qualities as well," and so new theories were born. (Page: 15). These characteristics were more than coincidental and Galton set about classifying and categorizing thousands of people based upon his hypothesis that negative hereditary existed, and that bad traits would out weigh the good and as a result, people would spiral biologically downward. Thus the term "eugenics" was utilized as "the study of all agencies under social control which can improve or impair the racial quality of future generations." (Page: 18).
Michael Ruse, The Darwinian Revolution, pub. 1979 by The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637
Social Darwinism is by no means dead, for vestiges of it can be found in the present.
The concept of Social Darwinism was a widely accepted theory in the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from each side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in various ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their conception of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, and liberal Herbert Spencer both gave arguments on the usefulness of competition between people on a global scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the belief of constant competition among members of the same species and emphasized mutual aid.
In order to comprehend the present state of these two forces, it is necessary to analyze more completely the meanings of Social Darwinism and Social Welfare. Every since Charles Darwin published the Origin of the Species in 1859, social scientists have attempted to explain human behavior as a product of natural selection. In the 19th century, Social Darwinism held that history was about the "survival of the fittest" and "superior" social groups were evolutionary more fit to rule the world. Social Darwinism was at the heart of many pernicious theories of the past century, including scientific racism and eugenics (Goldfield, et al, 1998, p. 721).
2. Brinkley, Alan, and Current, Richard N. American History: A Survey. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.
Most people believe that Social Darwinism is a term that can only be applied to people’s race, and for most well known social Darwinism theories this is true. The basis of these theories is always revolved around the term survival of the fittest. Darwin works where to do with animals and how animal species have ada...
Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection is viewed by many as one of the most significant and influential ideas ever conceived. However it took Darwin 20 years to publish his book ‘the origin of species’, one of the primary reasons for this was that he feared the implications his theory would have on the world. Although the theory of evolution greatly enhanced and progressed science as well as deepen human understanding of nature, it came at a cost. The theory led to the development of Social Darwinism, which further created a variety of different sociological and political ideologies. One of the most prominent of these was the idea of eugenics, which emphasized improving the genetic quality of a race through artificial selection. The eugenics
Social Darwinism is a late 19th century term used to describe the application of British naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection to social and political conditions. Late 19th century sociologist Herbert Spencer tried to capture the essence of social Darwinism with his phrase “survival of the fittest”. This essentially meant that the strong would rise to the top while the weak simply died out. Social Darwinists eschew social responsibility and compassion, instead believing that some people are more fit to survive than others. Many social Darwinists advocated that the government should maintain a laissez-faire, or hands off, approach when it came to regulating economic competition and alleviating social inequalities. Social Darwinism was used to justify the consolidation of the majority of wealth by a minority of Americans. The term allowed people to rationalize capitalism, imperialism, racism, and even eugenics. The wealthy believed in social Darwinism because it allowed them to justify their oppressive business tactics and low wages for their labor force. Politicians believed in it because it allowed them to justify imperialism, or expansion of the nation. Affluent Anglo-Saxons believed in social Darwinism, believing themselves to be the superior race, and used it to justify ...
Flory, Harriette, and Samuel Jenike. A World History: The Modern World. Volume 2. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1992. 42.