The Cycles of American History by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.

1102 Words3 Pages

The Cycles of American History by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.

The book The Cycles of American History by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. is a very interesting book about the history of America. The book was published by the Houghton Mifflin Company. The author Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., graduate and professor of history from Harvard College class of 1938, is the son of the famous historian Arthur Schlesinger Sr. Arthur Jr. is known for his books about U.S. presidents and their policies. He served as Special Assistant to the President in John F. Kennedy's administration and He coined the term Imperial Presidency during the Nixon administration . Schlesinger was known to be a harsh critic of totalitarian regimes and fellow travelers along with unregulated capitalism. In the book The Cycles of American History he presents an interesting case on the origins of the Cold War and the events that surrounded it.

Schlesinger uses two essays to illustrate his point and the change in attitude about the Cold War. He uses “Origins of the Cold War” which was published in Foreign Affairs in October 1967 . The other essay used is “The Cold War Revisited” which was published in the New York Review of Books on October 25, 1979 . In “Origins of the Cold War” the author explains what happen at the start of the Cold War. “The Cold War in its original form was a presumably moral antagonism, arising in the wake of the Second World War, between two rigidly hostile blocs, one lead by the Soviet Union, the other by the United States.” He starts off with his reasons on why the Cold War started in the first place. It was originally about morals and ideologies but it quickly escalated into an arms race, where both belligerents could easily wipe each other off the map. To he starts off with different views of the Cold War.

The author mentions about the Cold War revisionist views as the author says “In the United States (there are no signs, alas, of this in the Soviet Union), represent what American historians call “revisionism” – that is, a readiness to challenge official explanations.” He goes on to say that “It is useful to remember that, on the whole, past exercises in revisionism have failed to stick.” Though the he attacks revisions and notes its failures he then says that “But this does not mean that one should deplore the rise of Cold War revisionism.

More about The Cycles of American History by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.

Open Document