Criticisms on the Studies of World History

1980 Words4 Pages

In the late twentieth century, the study of world history has emerged to allow both historians and students to understand the world from a global perspective. World history is viewed to be part of the academic field than the research field. According to Charles Hedrick, author of The Ethics of World History, Western civilization was the main course taught in schools and universities before world history became part of the curriculum. The need to understand the world in a broader perspective compared to a Western perspective made the study of world history popular in the United States. Historians approached the study of world history with a thematic approach to understand the integration and difference between people and major events of the world. The subject of world history is broad and as a result is open to many interpretations. In addition, world historians faced difficulties in connecting the past while trying to appeal to all the perspectives of other cultures. These challenges made it difficult for historians to agree with a global framework to understand world history, without being ignorant of other cultures. As a result, historians approached world history differently and developed multiple directions such as a patriotic, Marxist, postcolonial and the ecumenical approach in order to meet the criteria. Criticisms arose from the different approaches on world history. Historians questioned and criticized the study of world history because the different approaches resulted in controversial matter such as the use of a Eurocentric perspective about history, issues of ethics, and the use of definitions that changed over time.
One of the most problematic problems about world history is the stance taken when looking at history f...

... middle of paper ...

... pointing out flaws that it produced. Overtime controversial matters such as the use of a Eurocentric perspective, issues of ethics, and use of language would change for the better.

Works Cited

Bentley, Jerry. “Myths, Wagers, and Some Moral Implications of World History.” Journal of World History 16, no. 1 (March 2005): 51-82.

Hendrick, Charles. “The Ethics of World History.” Journal of World History 16, no. 1 (March 2005): 33-49.

Keita, Maghan. “African and Asians: Historiography and the Long View of Global Interaction.” Journal of World History 16, no. 1 (March 2005): 1-30.

Manning, Patrick “The Problem of Interactions in World History.” The American Historical Review 101, no. 3 (June 1996): 771-82.

Ringmar, Erik. “Audience for a Giraffe: European Expansionism and the Quest for the Exotic.” Journal of World History 17, no. 4 (December 2006): 375-97.

Open Document