Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of transnational corporations
the socio economic impacts of transnational corporations
cost and benefits of foreign direct investment to host and home countries
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of transnational corporations
The Corporate Spread by John Madeley was intended to be a persuasive essay arguing that transnational corporations are secretive, unaccountable and one of the most influential actors in the global political economy (Madeley, 2013, pp. 1,17). While it is certainly possible that the general conclusion of Madeley’s essay is true; a reader of it couldn’t know because his writing lacks evidence and is full of speculation. In fact this is so much the case that it reads more like a wordy opinion piece you would find in the editorials of a newspaper than a reading used for academic instruction.
Initially, the paper starts out fine as the author introduces and defines what a transnational corporation is and provides a bit of background on foreign direct investment. Continuing the discussion on foreign direct investment is where the integrity of the essay begins to fall apart. He proceeds to describe: employment increases in TNC’s, 147 policy changes in host countries and increases in foreign direct investment (Madeley, 2013, p. 2). The problem is that the time period that Madeley is addressing covers twenty-six years and he fails to provide any context to consider this statistic in. There is no discussion about policy changes for national investment in those nations, nor is context provided demonstrating that 147 policy changes is even significant.
The author then moves on to explain to the reader how TNC’s are different from national corporations. Madeley concludes that large TNC’s have “enormous power over the governments of most developing countries, especially smaller countries” (2013, p. 5). The author does provide some supporting arguments to this claim suggesting that TNC’s are subject to preferential treatment over domestic fi...
... middle of paper ...
...transnational corporations are self-serving, abusive and morally incomprehensible with great yet completely untrue examples such as how the TRIMS agreement means that countries have to overturn economic nationalistic laws, when in fact membership in the WTO and subsequent acceptance of the TRIMS agreement is completely voluntary (Madeley, 2013, p. 11) (World Trade Organization, 2013). In all respects of his writing he has failed to persuade this reader who prefers evidence and comparative analysis to conjecture and moral imposition.
Works Cited
Madeley, J. (2013). The Corporate Spread. In H. Whiteside, & A. Ayers, Global Political Economy : Course Reader (pp. 1-17). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
World Trade Organization. (2013). Accessions. Retrieved 11 03, 2013, from World Trade Organization: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/acc_e.htm
Source one is an excerpt from the book called “Transnational Corporations: Knitting the world together”. This book was published in 2004 and the author is Keith Suter, a futurist. He believes that transnational corporations are now the main global economic force as they eroded the national market. He deems that due to transnational companies the world is now involved in one global market. He views transnational companies as a definite source of economic globalization. Transnational companies did not only bring jobs to less developed country but it also stimulated the economy of that country giving them motivation. Transnational companies had given less developed country a better quality of life and well-being. There are some critics about transnational companies but transnational company had given us a way to make our world more globally connected as what Keith Suter would agree upon.
Frieden, Jeffry A., David A. Lake, and Kenneth A. Schultz. World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2013. Print.
... consist with the success of Mexico’s growing “GDP” thanks to NAFTA. By creating NAFTA, North America is able to not just compete in the global market but also be the supreme leader. NAFTA rules the trade of good’s and services in an international scale, with over 1.1 trillion in goods and services being traded in North America alone. NAFTA has made world markets compete at a higher level to eventually eliminate all Tariffs on a global scale for all Corporations to trade freely. The creator’s of NAFTA understood the fundamental realities, that Corporations do not have borders or belong to a single country. Corporations live and breathe without the common knowledge of patriotism. Corporations live in a “New Economic World Order”. Thanks to NAFTA the blueprint has been drawn to begin a massive change in the way the world will conduct business in the near future.
To a considerable extent, transnational corporations have a large element of control over markets and can influence political decisions. For instance, fruit companies, such as Dole and Chiquita brands International have always dominated plantation monoculture whilst strong vertical and horizontal integration have enabled economies of scale and secured market access worldwide. In effect, Dole and Chiquita have become inheritors of the empires that their predecessors
This transfer of power from the localized State, to deterritorialized TNCs revels that, today, international corporations rule the world -- perhaps this represents the ultimate stage of capitalist globalization.
The activities of transnational corporations (TNCs), which are large companies that operate across a number of countries but have their headquarters in developed nations.
This paper explores the effects of neoliberalism ideology with the help of globalization on the growth and dominance of multinational and transnational corporations over governments. The case of nike etc in what country In particular, the discussion on multinational and transnational corporations that are growing in power and becoming more powerful that the governments.
Globalization’s shift to large scale production has forced companies to move towards localization, or expanding to other nations, and less standardization. Localization allows corporations to monopolize the power over cultures of other nations. In fact according to the World Bank’s World Development Report in 2000, of the world's 100 largest economic entities, 51 are now corporations and 49 are countries (Anderson, Sarah). National governments have lost their grasp on world power. The top corporations now suppress the combined economies of the countries and not to mention control the working conditions of countries they hold much influence over. Allowing these corporations to do as they please, charge what they want, and pay less than expected. After all how else would they be so powerful without excess profit? For example according to one source, 60% of the banana trade is controlled by only 3 companies and the all fami...
Starr, Amory. 2000. Naming the Enemy- Anti-Corporate Movements Confront Globalization. New York: Zed Books Ltd.
Different from liberals and structuralists, they believe that economic relations cause conflicts because they tend to view the world as a zero sum game in which one person’s gain is another person’s loss. One mercantilist is Kari Polanyi Levitt who argued that “transnational corporations are more similar to the trading corporations of the mercantilistic era such as the British East India Company than to the free traders and finance capitalists that characterized British enterprise in the nineteenth century” (Gilpin 189). According to the mercantilist argument, “the transnational corporation reflects a contemporary form of the economic expansion of particular nation states” (Gilpin 189). This argument follows the view of zero sum game because it is basically saying that “only particular nation states have been on the defensive, not the nation state as a political, especially the United States, have been on the economic offensive, expanding at the expense of other nation states” Gilpin 189). The role of the TNC has been viewed by political leaders in mercantilist terms of “maintaining America’s share of world markets, of securing a strong position in foreign economies, and of controlling access to raw materials; even more important, the TNC is judged is judged to be a major generator of the foreign earnings required to ensure national prosperity and to finance American military and political commitments overseas” (Gilpin
...the government owning the corporations completely. Traditionally democracies have a great sense of nationality and often reflect to the past days for a sense of “glory”. For instance the U.S. is a very nationalistic state as a vast majority of the country supports its troops occupying countries abroad. Also, not many countries in the world have citizens who proudly hang their countries flag outside their door. Though national pride for one's country shouldn’t be compared to the Nazi regime it is still an interesting look at modern nationalism.
Throughout the chapters assigned, Dicken focuses on the patterns and processes of global shifts, on the forms produced by the globalization of economic activities and on the forces producing those forms. He builds his arguments around three interconnected processes, which in his view are the reasons for reshaping the global economic map. Those are Transnational Corporations (“TNC”), States, and Technology.
... (eds.), Leviathans: Multinational Corporations and the New Global History, New York: Cambridge University Press.
There has also been some research on host country’s Governance towards TNC activities in their countries. Filling the technological gaps has a major importance for LDCs to speed up their economic development and because of this it is shown that Governments in some developing countries may overlook human right abuses performed by foreign investors provided that certain economic targets are being fulfilled. (Giuliani & Macchi 2004)
Brinkman, June E., and Richard L. Brinkman. "Corporate Power and the Globalization Process." International journal of social economics 29.9/10 (2002): 730-52. Print.