Corporate social responsibility ‘Corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) means that the firm has wider responsibilities in relation to objectives and people apart from the owners or shareholders (Beal and Goyen 2005). These responsibilities are achieved when the firm adapts all of its practices to ensure that it operates in ways that meet, or exceed, the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. Objectives often associated with CSR include a responsibility to manage natural assets sustainably and not to pollute by chemical discharge, smell, noise, dust or other irritants; fair treatment of employees and ethical attitude towards clients. The other people include employees, customers, suppliers, regulators and the public at large. In terms of CSR, management should make decisions based not only on financial factors such as profits or dividends, but also based on the immediate and long-term social and environmental consequences of their activities. CSR is increasingly being seen as an important and integral part of normal business operations. There are several advantages to adopt CSR for companies (Singapore Compact 2007). Create Shareholder Value Today consumers, investors, governments and even employees have become more sophisticated and more aware of good or bad corporate behaviour. An increasing number of investors are willing to invest in such companies that can meet certain environmental or social standards. There is growing evidence now that companies that embrace CSR generally outperform their competitors that do not consider CSR. Embrace of CSR can improve the company’s relations with its stock market valuation by protecting it from instability and share price volatility. Enhanc... ... middle of paper ... ...gress on the non-financial performance. For example, the DJSI results showed that ANB improved in risk and crisis management and stakeholder engagement; ANB got its REputex social responsibility rating of AA; ANB is included in the FTSE4Good Index (NAB Group 2007). References ASX, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (NAB), 2007, Available: http://www.asx.com.au/asx/research/CompanyInfoSearchResults.jsp?searchBy=asxCode&allinfo=on&asxCode=NAB, Accessed 2 August 2007. Diana Beal and Michelle Goyen (2005) Introducing Corporate Finance, John Wiley and Sons Australia Ltd., Milton, Queensland, Australia. National Australia Bank Group, Corporate Social Responsibility Reports, 2007, Available: http://www.nabgroup.com/0,,76587,00.html, Accessed 2 August 2007. Singapore Compact, What is CSR?, 2007, Available: http://www.csrsingapore.org/whatiscsr.php, Accessed 2 August 2007.
Orlitzky, M, Schmidt, F & Rynes, S 2003, ‘Corporate social and financial performance: A meta analysis’, Organization Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp 403-11.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a when a firm goes beyond compliance and engages in “actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law” (McWilliams, Siegel & Wright, 2006)...
It demonstrates that there can be no universal approach that would suit all relatively similar organizations. First of all, management always has to consider mentality, values, and norms existing in their local community, while also keeping in mind the attitudes existing in other communities and in the global market. At the same time, internal interests are no less significant in this matter, which is why great sensitivity is needed in the process of CSR creation and establishment. Thus, this article addresses both internal and external aspects of CSR as the parts of inseparable whole. It does not have independent and divided sections for each part as they are discussed in connection to one another, which is a realistic representation of an organizational decision-making process. In this way, the authors provide a practically applicable guideline that may be used to determine the most suitable CSR initiative, the methods of communicating this initiative to stakeholders, the resources that can and should be used, and the ways to involve stakeholders in the process of implementation as active participants rather than mere
Studies done by various researchers and scholars on corporate social responsibility impact on financial performance reveal mixed results with others citing a negative, positive neutral impact of CSR on financial performance of firms. Mwangi (2011) studied the relationship between CSR and financial performance of companies quoted at NSE. The results of the analysis conclude that there was an upward trend in performance of listed firms on the NSE as well as an upward trend in the amount of money investment in corporate social practices. This leaves managers with critical decisions to make especially on how much does a firm need to invest in CSR without compromising the returns of stakeholders more so the shareholders and whether investment in CSR has any impact at all on the financial performance of the firm.(Abagail & Donald ,
In recent years, more people begin to accept the concept of corporate social responsibility. Companies also pay more attention to the activities of CSR and investment. In addition to face the pressure of the environment and the social moral level, the enterprise managers also have the responsibility of the company 's performance and the value of the shareholder 's wealth. Therefore, enterprises need to pay more attention to the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
According to Mike Peng, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the consideration and response to issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm to accomplish social benefits along with traditional economic gains the firm seeks. CSR is a way in which a company seeks to achieve a balance between profit, environmental concerns and social imperatives. This is known as the ‘Triple-Botto...
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
...t in becoming more socially responsible corporations. For example, Pos Malaysia through their CSR practices, this corporation had focuses on a dual-pronged approach that is aimed at bringing value to the community and nation at large by the means of enhancing education particularly towards the enhancement of human capital development mainly in underprivileged areas and also Enriching Communities in which Pos Malaysia seeks to promote commerce and entrepreneurship within the communities they serve particularly in rural areas. The above CSR themes are aligned with Pos Malaysia mission to constantly strive to be a caring corporate citizen by supporting nation building and community services. This CSR will focused on the meeting the need and interest stakeholder of an organization by becoming more socially responsible and as well as to improve their image and reputation
Corporate Social Responsibility is an organisation’s obligation to serve the company’s own interest and the one’s of the society. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility has a definition of a concept where the companies integrate social and the environmental concerns into their own business operation and also on a basis of voluntary with their interactions they have with the stakeholders. Corporate Social Resp...
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...