International Accounting Standards And International Financial Reporting Standards

1770 Words4 Pages

With the rapid development of financial systems, the convergence of accounting standards becomes increasingly common in the world. It means that countries are more likely to adopt international standards instead of national standards in order to establish the same high-quality criterion to help companies worldwide use it for both domestic and cross-border accounting statements (Tarca, 2004). For this reason, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are described as a widespread global language for business affairs so that company accounts are comprehensible and comparable across international boundaries, and also provide available information to investors and shareholders to make decisions. Moreover, profiles are completed for 130 …show more content…

Furthermore, Financial reports record the relevant economic activities of businesses, help various stakeholders to understand the performance of the firm and the resources of management stewardship. Having replaced International Accounting Standards (IAS), which were older legislation from 1973 to 2000, IFRS was issued by International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on 1st April 2001 for the sake of making notable progress in developing comprehensive sets of accounting standards and international comparisons as easy as possible (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2012). Currently, IFRS has been publicly supported and confirmed by many international organizations, for instance, the G20, World Bank, IMF, but opponents criticize IFRS for being more principles-based than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GAAP refers to the standard framework of guidelines for financial statements in the U.S., but the latter was associated with more rules-based than IFRS (Ball, 2009). Nevertheless, Brown (2011) holds firmly to the belief that rules-based criterion is perceived as being too detailed and intricate, making it increasingly difficult for companies to transfer private information, which could reflect precise …show more content…

Some might argue that IFRS is prone to cause low-quality financial statements because Benston (2006) point out that IFRS could lead to indulging earnings management, and then corporations can make lots of accruals adjustments when calculating net income. This is to say, lacking the supervision of earnings would increase the risk to intentionally influencing the process of financial reports to obtain private gain by personal interests in order to mislead stakeholders about the underlying performance of companies and organizations. However, based on the empirical studies, Jeanjean and Stolowy (2006) puts forward a strong case that they analysed the allocation of incomes in Australia and the UK if companies have managed capital to avoid losses after the implementation of IFRS. In addition, Data indicated that situations have remained stable in both two countries. Correspondingly, another study demonstrated that even though it was less controlled, there was no distinction for firms in Ireland and Northern Europe (Aussenegg et al., 2008). Furthermore, Tendeloo and Vanstraelen (2005) claimed that although adopters (German) of IFRS cannot be associated with lower earnings management, there is still marked reduction of manipulating incomes by means of being audited by accountants. Overall, these findings showed that switching to IFRS was not an important inducement of causing the

Open Document