Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women in marriage in the Victorian era
Marriage during the Victorian era
Marriage during the Victorian era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women in marriage in the Victorian era
Conveniently Married
Life in the Victorian Era was centered on marriage. Among the nobility, marriage was typically sought to increase status or wealth with a partner of their same social class. This also holds true for the middle class, along with using marriage to gain political or business alliances. The working class of the Victorian Era had more practical reasons for marrying. The marriages of the working class centered more on finding a companion that would be able to contribute to the household. Many men sought a strong woman whose talents would complement their particular trade, and increase the amount of money that was made. Marriage rarely occurred for love, although the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert was an exception to this rule. About one matter Victoria felt certain: she would marry only for love. The example of their marriage set the standard for the ideal marriage in all classes, which is still sought after to this day.
Queen Victoria broke the standard mold of marriage by marrying for love. There were, of course, political reasons that she must marry.
Indirectly, the ‘bedchamber crisis’ also raised anew the question of when and how Victoria might appropriately find a husband. As she herself sometimes conceded, to live among people most of whom were much older than herself was unnatural. Tories hoped that a husband might cause the ‘Whig Queen’ to become less partisan. Whigs were aware that, without a husband, Victoria could not continue the royal succession.
Victoria also had to find a husband of her own social class of royalty. Yet the future Czar Alexander II was obviously an inappropriate choice; so was a mere English subject. Here we see the distinction of class in the choice of a partner. ...
... middle of paper ...
...tance to marry outside of a particular class. These two novels, despite going outside the norm, show how much of an influence Queen Victoria had in that they portray marriage for love and the model of domesticity. In the working class, marriage was mainly a source of supplementing the family income. In any case, one can see how people of the Victorian Era were conveniently married.
Works Cited
Arnstein, Walter. Queen Victoria. New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2003.
Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 2003.
Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 2005.
Browning, Elizabeth. Aurora Leigh. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1996.
Clark, Anna. The Struggle for the Breeches Gender and the Making of the British Working Class. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of Californian Press, 1995.
In nineteenth century Great Britain, women’s status and rights are almost non existent. She cannot vote, she cannot own property, she cannot get divorced. Everything she has— even her body—belongs to her husband. Women who come from humble beginnings are constrained into the occupations of household servants, farm laborers or factory workers in order to survive. “The only ‘genteel’ professions open to middle-class women [are] governess, school teacher or companion to a wealthy woman with its awkward status between servant and lady” (Thaden 66). The only reasonable way for women to obtain any social position or economic security is to be married into it. Unlike most middle-class boys who receive an education to prepare them for a profession, mo...
Feminism is motivated by the need to establish equality between the genders since most feminists attribute women’s problems to inequality between the two genders. Therefore, by way of a collection of political movements and social theories, feminists seek to curb this inequality between men and women. It is important to note that the equality sought after by feminists is not just economic and political, but also social equality. According to Heather Gilmour, The institution of marriage during the pre-modern era or the Victorian era was based on inequality as the roles to be fulfilled by both genders for the success of the marriage were essentially different (Heather 26). As the roles kept changing over time due to different circumstances, so did the expectations of marriage and along with that, the rise of feminist movement. Screwball comedies such as It...
a huge role in deciding who to marry, rich men went for women of the
In the Victorian era, in New York City, men and women roles within the society were as different as night and day. A man regardless of his extra curricular activities could still maintain a very prevalent place in society. A woman’s worth was not only based family name which distinguished her class and worth, but also her profession if that was applicable.
During the Victorian Era, society had idealized expectations that all members of their culture were supposedly striving to accomplish. These conditions were partially a result of the development of middle class practices during the “industrial revolution… [which moved] men outside the home… [into] the harsh business and industrial world, [while] women were left in the relatively unvarying and sheltered environments of their homes” (Brannon 161). This division of genders created the ‘Doctrine of Two Spheres’ where men were active in the public Sphere of Influence, and women were limited to the domestic private Sphere of Influence. Both genders endured considerable pressure to conform to the idealized status of becoming either a masculine ‘English Gentleman’ or a feminine ‘True Woman’. The characteristics required women to be “passive, dependent, pure, refined, and delicate; [while] men were active, independent, coarse …strong [and intelligent]” (Brannon 162). Many children's novels utilized these gendere...
...e acts as a social construct since she details her own rise to riches as a result of marriage, but society ignores the larger significance of marriage: procreation. This major aspect never receives any attention from either Lady Bracknell or Victorian society due to a cultural taboo. Wilde uses her views on marriage to illustrate the fundamental perversion of the Victorian matrimonial ideal since it uses marriage as a social construct while ignoring the sexual construct.
The role of a woman remains the same throughout human history. Many women prepare for the role of wife and mother from an early age. If one is not married at a certain age then they are labeled as a spinster, a prude. Hedda Gabler and Emma Bovary fearful of being dubbed as a spinster, marry men whom they both despised. During the mid 1800’s, Emma Bovary’s period: women considered inferior to their male counterparts, they could not divorce their husbands, and their husbands essentially own them. Alas during Hedda Gabler’s setting, nothing changes. Because of their society, they are alienated individuals thwarted due to their social status, gender, and misguided intentions.
Stromquist, Kat. “Royal Weddings In Romantic Britian.” Britian 79.4 (2011)” 42-45. Master File Elite. Web 5 Mar. 2014.
The industrialization of the nineteenth century was a tremendous social change in which Britain initially took the lead on. This meant for the middle class a new opening for change which has been continuing on for generations. Sex and gender roles have become one of the main focuses for many people in this Victorian period. Sarah Stickney Ellis was a writer who argued that it was the religious duty of women to improve society. Ellis felt domestic duties were not the only duties women should be focusing on and thus wrote a book entitled “The Women of England.” The primary document of Sarah Stickney Ellis’s “The Women of England” examines how a change in attitude is greatly needed for the way women were perceived during the nineteenth century. Today women have the freedom to have an education, and make their own career choice. She discusses a range of topics to help her female readers to cultivate their “highest attributes” as pillars of family life#. While looking at Sarah Stickney Ellis as a writer and by also looking at women of the nineteenth century, we will be able to understand the duties of women throughout this century. Throughout this paper I will discuss the duties which Ellis refers to and why she wanted a great change.
Two hundred years ago, during the reign of Queen Victoria in England, the social barriers of the Victorian class system firmly defined the roles of women. The families of Victorian England were divided into four distinct classes: the Nobility or Gentry Class, the Middle Class, the Upper Working Class, and lastly, the Lower Working class . The women of these classes each had their own traditional responsibilities. The specifics of each woman’s role were varied by the status of her family. Women were expected to adhere to the appropriate conventions according to their place in the social order . For women in Victorian England their lives were regulated by these rules and regulations, which stressed obedience, loyalty, and respect.
There have always been class divisions in England’s social groups, but it was not until the nineteenth century that they were labeled. The lower class was often uneducated and overlooked and mostly servants and prostitutes, the middle class generally had steady jobs and members of the higher classes were born to old money and did not have to work. The French Lieutenant’s Woman written by John Fowles is a complex “Victorian novel filled with enchanting mysteries and magically erotic possibilities” (Canby) in which, Fowles describes a Victorian society in 1867 that is still largely separated by class, which creates strong restrictions with respect to sex and marriage. Notably, conflict in the novel involves scandals where these restrictions are disregarded. Fowles shows that sex and marriage were still largely dictated by whether a person belonged to the lower, middle or upper class in order to highlight that there were more restrictions for higher-class men and women.
Wojczak, Helena. “English Women’s History.” English women’s history. Hasting Press. n.d. Web 24 Nov 2013
Oscar Wilde’s assessment of marriage can be considered cynical, but it was a relatively accurate assessment considering the time period. On the other hand, his opinion would be disregarded now, as people do not tend to marry for social status or financial gain, but for love and companionship. I agree with Wilde’s opinion of marriage in the Victorian society, but I do not believe that his opinion is accurate today. Personally, I believe in the institution of marriage. Marriage does not mean the end of romance and love.
The difference in social class between Anne Elliot and Captain Wentworth affect their ability to get married. Sir Walter doesn't like the idea of having equality with men in the service, because he thinks it makes them unworthy of certain attributes, which is not uncommon for this time period. In this situ...
... they were able to marry off three out of their five daughters. However, only two of these marriages were based on love and adoration. Jane and Elizabeth both found men that treasured and respected them. They lived comfortable lives financially and were very happy with their lives. Lydia’s marriage with Wickham was not as strong as that of Jane and Elizabeth. They lived uncomfortably because they were not able to support their extravagant spending habits. Eventually their love died for each other. “His affection for her soon sunk into indifference; her’s lasted a little longer” (366). Mr. Wickham started to resent Lydia and ultimately she began to feel the same towards him. Mr. and Mrs. Bennet were able to raise two daughters who were sensible and well respected in social atmospheres. Mr. and Mrs. Bennet only wanted what was best for their daughters.