Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address” and Pericles “Funeral Oration” are both speeches that clearly portray similar and diverse components.
To begin, Lincoln and Pericles both express tone in similar ways. In order to encourage his frazzled and hopeless soldiers and families, in addition to emphasizing the deceased, Lincoln needed to state his tone in an explicit and benevolent approach in the “Gettysburg Address”. To do this, Lincoln begins his speech with “Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the position that all men are created equal.” Because the exact opposite was enduring at that time, Lincoln states this to remind the soldiers of what they are fighting for. Likewise, using a solemn tone, Pericles also attempts to grasp attention by introducing the past. He attempts this by extoling the ancestors of Athens. Which is obvious because he begins with the words “I shall begin with our ancestors”. In the second paragraph he states that they dwelt in the country from time to time without failure, and for this reason is it proper for them to have the first mention at a time of honoring the fallen.
Additionally, throughout the “Gettysburg Address” and “Funeral Oration” several types of rhetorical devices are found. In the “Gettysburg Address” Lincoln employs many rhetorical devices such as repetition, alliteration and metaphors. He introduces repetition twice in the speech. First, he introduces it with the words “we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground.” With the duplication of the word “cannot”, Lincoln states that they are not able to dedicate, consecrate or in other words hallow the ground a...
... middle of paper ...
...es the audience that they should fight for their freedom.
To conclude, “The Gettysburg Address” and the “Funeral Oration” have comparable components such as tone, forms of rhetorical devices, and both similar and diverse themes. They take place in different places as well as different time periods. Also they have different purposes of getting to the point of continuing the war. Although, they have different ways of convincing, they both have an urge to continue the war, because it must be won. It absolutely must be won, in order for the countries in either time period to live freely, without fear of enslavement. Both also state the purpose of honoring those who accepted the risk of dying, so that we could be free and live in liberty. As Thomas Jefferson once said the natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and for the government to gain ground.
Lincoln’s Famous Address written by Roselynn Marquez talks about how Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address was only 270 words, and it followed a two hour introduction by Edward Everett. Being short was not the only memorable point that the speech had. “Another was the simplicity of its language. As historian Allen Guelzo notes, ‘the address relies on crisp, plain vocabulary.’ He points out that most of the words are only one-syllable. Doris Kearns Goodwin concludes, ‘Lincoln had translated the story of his country...into words and ideas accessible to every American.’ By making his ideas easy to grasp, Lincoln gave them directness and power” (Marquez). The Gettysburg Address to this day is known as a unforgettable expression inscribing the war that took on in the country. In summarization, Abraham Lincoln is known widely for the Address he made in Gettysburg after the battle that took place
(A depiction of how the Gettysburg Address and Letter to His son are both similar and different in what Lincoln and Lee talk about)
Perhaps unbeknownst to him, Lincoln engaged in the two thousand-year-old tradition of epitaphios logos, or a particular form of Greek eulogizing. Lincoln’s eulogy appears to consider aspects of Gorgias’, another example of epitaphios logos. Both eulogies use similar themes and diction. Furthermore, these two eulogies are alike in purpose; both Lincoln and Gorgias seek to honor the dead as heroes and assuage the living. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the connections of the two eulogies that allow a cogent comparison.
Union Commander Meade, out of fatigue and caution, did not immediately go after Lee, getting President Lincoln very angry who wrote a mad letter to Meade, which was never delivered, saying he missed an opportunity to end the war at this instance (The History Place Battle of Gettysburg 4). Although the casualties were basically equal, the Battle of Gettysburg was the second and last great invasion of the of the North, for the South had neither arms nor numbers to continue an assault, but the War dragged on for two more years. On November 19, President Lincoln went to the battlefield to dedicate it as a military cemetery. He spoke for a short period of time delivering what is called the Gettysburg Address, surprising many present in the audience with its shortness and leaving others quite unimpressed, but over time the speech has come to symbolize democracy as we know it today (Funk & Wagnalls Encyclopedia Vol. 11 385.
...ou see through examples, all three types of rhetoric are present in Gehrig’s farewell speech.
Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words That Remade America "Fourscore and seven years ago ." These are the first 5 of only two hundred seventy-two words that remade America. In Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words That Remade America, the author, Gary Wills, informed us that Abraham Lincoln wanted equality among us and to unite as one. In Abraham Lincoln's own speech, he would not mention single individuals or even top officers. Everyone was considered as equal importance and was never any different. "Though we call Lincoln's text the Gettysburg Address, that title clearly belongs to Everett." 1 This is very true, which I think is interesting. Everett who was chosen by David Wills to commemorate the National Cemetery of Gettysburg, was supposed to be the speaker while Lincoln was only the dedicatory remarks speaker. Not only did Lincoln have the favorable speech, it was only three minutes while Everett's was two hours long. Lincoln also supposedly was not supposed to be there to speak; he actually just told a correspondent that he would be present. It's amazing to believe that a two hundred seventy-two word speech would say so much to thousands of people.
Published widely, the Gettysburg Address eloquently expressed the war’s purpose, looking back to the Founding Fathers, the Declaration of Independence and the pursuit of human equality.
Roosevelt’s speeches utilizes parallel structure to the best of his ability and makes it work in his favor. Lincoln on the other hand does not use parallel structure and his speeches take on a dull tone. When Roosevelt talks about the depression, he uses imagery to help the listeners see into his mind and see what he sees. Lincoln talks mainly about God’s purpose and how the Civil War was sent by God as punishment. When Roosevelt talks about the bombing, his tone laden with sadness and anger, the anger showing when he talks about the bombing and the response they had received from the Japanese one hour after the bombing. Lincoln’s tone in his Gettysburg Address is full of sadness as he talks about the deaths of the men who fought in the war.
It is widely known that the Athenians highly valued their warrior class, and they saw the warriors as a ring of the higher circle of the society. The Athenians were very proud of Athena and its traditions, as well. Athenian’s thought that Athena was the best, none could be better. The funeral oration was aimed to respect the fallen as well as to keep up the national pride and its passion to protect their nation. The speech was a eulogy which focused on the eminence of Athens and its predecessors. Usually a son was chosen to give the eulogy. The law required the speech to have several essential components. The speech had to concerning the lives of the deceased. At his eulogy’s end, Pericles spoke in regard to the soldiers. The speech talked about the life that the departed lived and the achievements which they gained. Pericles wanted the citizens to recall the soldiers but to forget about the tragedy that had occurred. He wanted the departed’s lives to be remembered, but not their demise. The speech helped the Athenians appreciate what their ancestors had died for and how they shou...
Lincoln's style in this speech was inevitably persuasive. His rhetorical strategy appeals to not only the readers senses, but to their intellectual knowledge as w...
Pericles’s speech honored the war dead at this public funeral by commemorating their government and military accomplishments. Thucydides recorded the speech because he only recorded the things he believed to be the true account of something that happened in society.
By turning the Civil War into a war about slavery he effortlessly ensured that no foreign country would recognize the South as an independent nation, ensuring Union success in the war. In his speech, Lincoln used the rhetorical devices of juxtaposition, repetition, and parallelism, to touch the hearts of its listeners. Lincoln had numerous purposes for the Gettysburg Address. Firstly, it was to be used to dedicate the land where the Battle of Gettysburg had taken place as a cemetery for the fallen troops of both the North and the South, the most apparent and central reason for his address. His second purpose for the address was to transform the war on states’ rights into a war on slavery and upholding the ideals that the Founders had authored in the Declaration of Independence.
For Pericles, Athenian values are realized through culture and “daily devotion.” He claims that Athenian citizens obey both “the laws themselves” and “agreed-on social values (which need no specific legislation),” not requiring legislation to uphold their values. Accordingly, Pericles views exceptionalism as intrinsic to Athenians. Boasting about the city, Pericles questions “how else did she become great but by this genius in her citizens?” A recommitment to civic values, therefore, is simple to Pericles: Athenians are exceptional at the moment of his speech, and must simply continue their past conduct in order to achieve future
On November 19, President Lincoln went to the battlefield to dedicate it as a military cemetery. The main orator, Edward Everett of Massachusetts, delivered a two-hour formal address. The president then had his turn. He spoke in his high, penetrating voice and in a little over two minutes delivered the Gettysburg Address, surprising many in the audience by its shortness and leaving others quite unimpressed. Over time, however, the speech and its words - government of the People, by the People, for the People - have come to symbolize the definition of democracy itself.
Thucydides’ version of Pericles’ “Funeral Oration” can be read as more of an ironic rendering of Pericles’ original speech since The History of the Peloponnesian War is not just considered to be a historical account but also a “highly imaginative piece of work” in which Thucydides made characters involved in the war say what he believed they actually meant instead of what they might have originally said (Thucydides Introduction pg. x). In the “Funeral Oration”, Pericles praises certain