Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
constitute knowledge
what is a knowledge
what is constitute knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: constitute knowledge
Knowledge is a rather abstract word taking on different meanings depending on the society that defines it. However, one of the defining point’s common in almost all of the definitions that I could find is that knowledge involves the collective use of facts. In reference to Human Sciences and History, I believe the statement “Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts” to be false. While facts are indeed an important part of knowledge and learning, it is not the only portion of it. It is not always feasible or even possible to organize all the facts required to respond properly to certain scenarios. On occasion, along with having the facts, one must apply inductive or deductive reasoning. Looking at the area of knowledge …show more content…
Because a lot of the information gathered in this area of knowledge is obtained by observing human behavior, there are many limitations to this field of study. Beginning in the observation stage, there are three main limitations. While we may be able to observe human behavior, we have no way of knowing exactly what is going through a person’s head at the time of experiment, which rules out some forms of study. However, if the experiment allows a subject to speak about what they are thinking about it still leaves room for a subject to lie if they so choose. Which leads into the next limitation, humans tend to be effected by the observer effect; when subjects are observed they tend to act differently than when acting normally which can affect the study. Another limitation in observation is that the questionnaires given to subjects can be misleading or biased to one side. Because humans have an intense need to seem normal, known as the social phenomena, subjects may tend to lean towards the side that seems most positive, or the side that most other people would …show more content…
History connects things in our present to our past, which enables us to foresee in what direction we progress. Because in order to progress, we must have a clear picture on the basis on which some institutions are founded, and the study of history paints that picture for us. History not only links the present to the past, but it also contributes to our general sense of identity because, “a country without a history is like a person without a memory.” Without history we are without identity and direction. The Area of Knowledge History is uses the historical methodology which relies on the gathering of primary and secondary
History allows us to find how we fit into our homes, communities, and nations. It also gives us a common ideal; to know from where we came and from there, know where we are going. As individuals, we can also use history to understand the heart, value, and belief that caused our nation to become strong. It brings a people together, keeping them strong.
The world is living histories. For instance, communities speak the languages that are inherited from the past and, practice cultural and religious traditions that have not been created on the spur of a moment. In this sense, acknowledging history is essential for rooting people in time. Nonetheless, sometimes a dreadful past can inhibit a country to undertake its own history. For example, the United States has long been telling
“Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts”. Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge.
The patterns of living that the world witnesses today are greatly influenced by history. This is because of the fact that history plays an immense role in forming one’s future; the abundant interactions socially, economically, politically, result in repercussions that can hardly be unraveled. However, this does not in anyway mean that one cannot trace today’s state of affairs back to its roots. Tracing today’s occurrences back to their origin is possible due to the fact that the agents’ (nations) origins are known.
History and time are considered to be cultural formations since a History cannot be detached from the culture in which it is produced and received. It is through culture that a historical sense is achieved and in fact, each culture experiences History in a different way leading us to the current perception of History as not being one, but many histories depending on the cultural groups involved. Historians have fought throughout the centuries on whether such thing as “objective History” can exist but in the end, even materialist historians will admit that the reality of History is so complicated and contradictory that no single version could possibly represent the truth; consequently different interpretations are inevitable.
Our knowledge is indeed an interpretation of our experiences and facts that we have learned or acquired throughout life. Nonetheless, it is impossible to have a full knowledge of everything or to, at least, try to know everything because knowledge is so broad and extensive that it makes this task quite impossible. Therefore, we store our knowledge in structures so we can navigate through it. It is important to have in mind that there is not absolute knowledge because the acquisition of it is also biased by our different ways of knowing such as emotion and reason. Thus, this statement is to a large extent true that our knowledge is a collection of scraps and those new fragments that are found can alter our entire design of our knowledge. For example in natural sciences, theories and laws of physics, biology, and chemistry can modify the way that we explain natural and artificial events because our world is in constant change, so does technology, which leads scientists and researchers to new finding, this might complement the knowledge that we already know or it might also change it drastically. Furthermore, in history new archeological findings can contradict and ultimately alter our formal conception of the events that have happened in the past. On the other hand, this statement can be somehow not truth, in a small extent, because regardless of new findings, these, so called, new information can be limited to the public thus not leading to an open overview of the subject. For instance, in history, new archeological findings are limited to the public thus they are not fully aware of the situation and past events that might have happened. While, in natural sciences is different because the issue relies on the people who keep believ...
History comes from the Greek word historia, meaning "inquiry, investigation” and it later came to specifically mean “investigation of the past”. It is a field of study which uses a story to scrutinize and evaluate a chain of events in order to objectively determine patterns of cause and effect of past events. All events that are remembered & safeguarded in some way or the other form part of a historical record.
History is not only a valuable part of knowledge, but opens the door to many other parts, and affords materials to most of the sciences. And indeed, if we consider the shortness of human life, and our limited knowledge, even of what passes in our own time, we must be sensible that we should be forever children in understanding, were it not for this invention, which extends our experience to all past ages, and to the most distant nations; making them contribute as much to our improvement in wisdom, as if they had actually lain under our observation. A man acquainted with history may, in some respect, be said to have lived from the beginning of the world, and to have been making continual additions to his stock of knowledge in every century.
History is the study of the past, particularly on how it relates to humans. (Anderson, 2014) Traditionally, historians record past events and also attempted to answer historical questions through the study of written documents and oral accounts. In general, the sources of historical knowledge that historians consult can be separated into three distinct categories: what is written, what is said, and what is physically preserved. (Lemon, 1995) However, History does not rest solely on memory but on critical understanding. It is difficult to distinguish the truth and determine, from many differing accounts, which is most factually accurate. Those who know only by tittle-tattle the role of criticism are aware of its use in historical circles. And yet this is only part of the task of historical studies. (Ranke, 2010) As a result, Ibn Khaldun invented a scientific method to the study of history, and he often referred to it as his "new science". (Franz Rosenthal, 1967) As Ranke wrote, “Just as science endeavours to press on to the inner sources of nature from which all things spring, so it is with history.” (Ranke, 2010) As such, History is a science as it attempts to formulate a hypothesis of the past based on empirical historical evidence. However, History and Science differs on their purpose and reliability. Despite these differences, History ultimately aims to
Any knowledge around us is constructed by stories and facts. At the first glance while considering about the authenticity of the statement on whether the stories or facts are the parts to construct the knowledge, it’s important to get an understanding of the key terms at the beginning by the defining these terms. A fact stands for the theory which had been proved by actual science research or observations, whereas the story is a narrative which is based on fiction. A fact is usually a statement which describe a truth in short explanation. It is the study which focuses on the nature and involves experiments and theories. That is very logical and is supported with evidence and reason. The absolute facts usually appear in natural science because the natural science does not have the involvement of radical imagination which is no influence in their scientific research, unlike the art. To get an understanding of whether the knowledge is accumulated by stories or facts, the definition of knowledge is the past experience which had been justified as true. People usually get knowledge through life experience、religion or education or other places. Knowledge can be incorrect and can be beliefs. Scientific knowledge is reliable but the understanding is changing rapidly. History is an example of less reliable knowledge. As the only area of knowledge which records and demonstrates past human experiences, history may not work as well as the natural sciences in presenting knowledge since it focus on describing the fact in the story form. As one of the areas of knowledge which mainly made by facts, natural science is the possible corresponding area of knowledge which relate to the “reason” which allows people go beyond the immediate experience of ...
History, like others courses, teaches in school, is a scientific branch of learning that is interested in comprehending the past of humanity and human civilizations and seeks to reconstitute it. Being a science, history has its objective, methods, and plays an important function in human civilizations. We know about history through the written documents or textbooks. We study history to learn and to analyze events, individual exploits, and civilization of the past. This process takes into account the time and the space because the examination of a historical object requires placing it in time and in a given space.
History is a story told over time. It is a way of recreating the past so it can be studied in the present and re-interpreted for future generations. Since humans are the sole beneficiaries of history, it is important for us to know what the purpose of history is and how historians include their own perspective concerning historical events. The purpose and perspective of history is vital in order for individuals to realise how it would be almost impossible for us to live out our lives effectively if we had no knowledge of the past. Also, in order to gain a sound knowledge of the past, we have to understand the political, social and cultural aspects of the times we are studying.
` Knowledge from my point of view is cumalitive to some extent. As humans, we are always learning and discovering new ways to pursue improvements in life.Science and history are two branches of knowledge that effect our perception of the world around us. In science, we gain knowledge through every discovery we make and with every experiment we conduct, it may be a result of an accident or pure scientific work. Scientific knowledge has gradually accumulated over successive generations, with each new generation building on the advances of previous ones. In history, the past affects and changes the way we view the world around us. History is never discarded but adapted and learned from to better the future. However, we can say knowledge is not always discarded, but rather,becomes the basis of advanced knowledge. This is one of the ways that knowledge evolves.
Knowledge has a preliminary definition which is that it is justified true belief. Due to its dynamic nature, knowledge is subject to review and revision over time. Although, we may believe we have objective facts from various perceptions over time, such facts become re-interpreted in light of improved evidence, findings or technology and instigates new knowledge. This raises the questions, To what extent is knowledge provisional? and In what ways does the rise of new evidence give us a good reason to discard our old knowledge? This new knowledge can be gained in any of the different areas of knowledge, by considering the two areas of knowledge; History and Natural Sciences, I will be able to tackle these knowledge issues since they both offer more objective, yet regularly updated knowledge, which is crucial in order to explore this statement. I believe that rather than discarding knowledge we build upon it and in doing so access better knowledge, as well as getting closer to the truth.
To explore what it really means to have knowledge we must first have to come to common understanding of this word means. There is a common definition by the oxford dictionary published in 21th century claiming knowledge to be the facts, information, and skills acquired through experiences or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. We all have our own connotations to this word, but to build a common understanding we stick to the definition of the word.