Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the usefulness of comparative politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the usefulness of comparative politics
“Those who only know one country know no country.” – Seymour Martin Lipset.
The scholar Guy Swanson once said, “Thinking without comparison is unthinkable. And, in the absence of comparison, so is all scientific thought and scientific research.” (cited in Ragin, 1992). As such, comparison is necessary for the development of political science. The ‘art of comparing’ can be seen as what experimentation is to most sciences – the principal and most effective way to test theory. (Peters, 1998) This essay seeks to describe the different aspects of the ‘art of comparing’ and also to detail the reasons why the comparative method is a necessary tool in the belt of any political scientist.
Comparative politics is one of three main subfields in political science, alongside political theory and international relations. While political theory deals with theoretical issues about democracy, justice et cetera, comparative politics deals with more empirical questions. To use an example cited by Daniele Caramani in ‘Comparative Politics’ (2011), comparative politics is not interested in whether or not participation is good for democracy. It is instead concerned with the way people participate, and why they participate in certain ways. As such, comparative politics can be viewed as empirical and ‘value-free.’ On the other hand, international relations – as the name suggests – looks at interactions between political systems, whereas comparative politics prefers to study interactions within political systems. Again according to Caramani (2011), comparative politics does not ignore external influences on internal structures, but its ultimate concern is power configurations within sovereign systems.
The ‘art of comparison’ is a necessary tool in any po...
... middle of paper ...
...le Caramani, 2011. Comparative Politics. 2 Edition. Oxford University Press, USA.
3. G. Bingham Powell Jr., 1984. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence (Menil Foundation). Edition. Harvard University Press.
4. Guy B. Peters, 1998. Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods (Comparative Government and Politics). Edition. Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Peter Hall 2004 ‘Beyond the Comparative Method’ ASPA- Comparative Politics Newsletter, 15(2): 1-4
6. S.E. Finer, 1997. The History of Government from the Earliest Times: The Intermediate Ages v.2 (Vol 2). Edition. Oxford University Press.
7. Seymour Martin Lipset, 1996. American Exceptionalism : A Double-Edged Sword (AMERICAN HISTORY, POLITICAL THEORY). Edition. W. W. Norton & Company, Incorporated.
8. Todd Landman, 2000. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. 0 Edition. Routledge.
It is evident that American exceptionalism has precipitated an incredible amount of debate over time, which has led to various understandings during each historical period. First, the concept has a religious foundation when it is adopted by John Winthrop to mean the promising land for ideal society or “A model of Christian Charity” (Hodgson 1). That is, the Puritans foresaw an exceptional destiny for America as “city upon a hill.” Second, in the Enlightenment era, Franklin gives the idea more secular sense with a rationalism influence. Next, Abess initially welcomed the idea of exceptionalism, but went on to attack it because it involves the destruction of Indian tribes. Third, the American Renaissance authors embraced the concept of Exceptionalism, not only to advocate democracy, but also to free the American identity from the European influence. Fourth, foreign travelers like, de Tocqueville and Chesterton believe in American exceptionalism. For de Tocqueville, democracy is the key success factor of American society, which distinguishes it from any nations elsewhere. For Chesterton, America is an exceptional nation because of its unique foundation: “America is the only nation in the world that is founded on a creed” (Chesterton 7). That creed is that all men are created
Shapiro, Ian, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek E. Masoud, eds. Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge ; Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Janda, Kenneth, Jeffrey M. Berry and Jerry Goldman. The Challenge of Democracy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.
...ited States of America has a presidential system, the United Kingdom has a parliament system, and Russia has a semipresidential system. For the presidential system, as mentioned before, the main feature is the establishment of the separation of powers. In the Parliamentary system, legislative and executive powers are fused together; same people-same institution. The conflict of lack of clarity among the prime minister and president in the semipresidential system has in occasions created opportunities for more judicial scope (O’Neil, 2007). The United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Russia have systems that make their political aspects different. However the similarities make it easier to understand the institutions and their duties. This analysis in using compare and contrast is necessary in being able to understand political structures among the nations.
The first school of thought that we will explore is the “Classical Paradigm” also known as “Realism”. Proponents of this school argue that its assumptions can be found as early as in the accounts of Thucydides nearly three millennia ago. (Nye 13) When examining Realism there are number of important factors to note. First Realists consider their perspective to be empirical rather than normative. Hans Morgenthau, one of the most influential figures in the realist school as established by recent polling amongst International Relations Experts (Maliniak, Oakes, & Tierny, 2007) stated, “Politics is…governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature.” (Morgenthau, 1967)
In 2013, Charles Murray, an American political scientist, published his work, American Exceptionalism. In this 50 page treatise, Murray argues for an exceptional America countering the more prominent modernist views that America never was, and therefore is not, exceptional. Both sides of the debate are presented in this book, so that one can ascertain whether or not America was exceptional, despite Mr. Murray’s obvious slant to the former. What are Murray’s arguments for American exceptionalism, was America exceptional, and is America still exceptional today?
Larry Johnston (2008) Politics: An Introduction to the Modern Democratic State, Third Edition, Chapters 2, 3, 7, 8 and 9.
1. Janda, Kenneth. The Challenge of Democracy. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, MA. 1999. (Chapter 3 & 4).
Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Political Philosophy is typically a study of a wide range of topics such as, justice, liberty, equality, rights, law, politics and the application of a codified law. Depending on what the philosophy is, it usually tends to be a very sensitive and a personal ideology that an individual holds within the reality of their existence. Several of the fundamental topics of political philosophy shape up the society that we live in as these specific topics and their implementation by the state ensures a legitimate government. In Political Philosophy, the aforesaid concepts or topics are evaluated and analyzed with tremendous depth in context to their history and intent. Furthermore, in a rather colloquial sense, political philosophy is generally a point of view which after some deep thinking asks questions such as, what are the government’s duties? Is it legitimate? What makes it legitimate? What are the duties of its citizens? What are their rights? Are they protected? So on and so forth. In the following paper, I will canvass my political philosophy and elaborate on my reasoning behind it.
Every country differs in their preference of political system to govern their countries. For democratic countries, two possible choices of governing are the presidential system and the parliamentary system. Since both the presidential and the parliamentary systems have their own strengths and weaknesses, many scholars have examined these two forms of government, and debate on which political system is more successful in governance. In this paper, I will first provide a detailed analysis of both the parliamentary and the presidential system. I will also evaluate each system’s strengths and weaknesses, addressing any differences as well as any commonalities. Finally, I will conclude by using historical examples to analyze and support the presidential system, which would be a more desirable system for a democratic government.
Hague, R. & M. Harrop (2010). Comparative Government and Politics. 8th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 64.
Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The interest of the person on the social phenomenons brings him to feel the necessity of walking on a more systematic and technical way. Most of the social scientists probably started like this. Important thing is to decide which one would be your basic discipline or perspective. From which point of view do you consider or approach the events? Your starting point is economical or philosophical or religious or maybe political? This paper is actually indicates the signs of a political science and international relations student’ thoughts and opinions.
Comparative politics is an important aspect of political science in that instead of studying how this country functions, it studies why other countries around the world are the way they are. There must be some medium for finding the differences and similarities between one county and another in order discover what can effect such aspects as economic strength, military strength, and the structure of the regime in power. One reason to compare countries is to help ourselves by allowing us to learn about other countries while escaping the ethnocentric fallacy many of us have. The Unites States may have a good government but is not necessarily a perfect government; certain countries may have aspects of their own government that we could learn from and perhaps improve upon our own system. Another reason to compare countries is to understand how countries evolve, discover patterns, and why they evolve in the way they do. Another very important reason to study comparative politics is to better understand how certain regimes work for purposes of international relations and foreign policy. In order to create policy regarding other countries and in order to give aid to these countries we must know how these countries function so that we can work with the countries instead of blindly trying to change them in a way that we seem fit. This is especially important in the modern age with the evolution of a global cooperation between many countries and the fact that the United States has become the watchdog, big brother, and teacher for many of the less developed countries of the world.