Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
college athletes and economics
athletic scholarships pro
college athletes and economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: college athletes and economics
College athletics have been incredibly profitable businesses for many years. With the advent of televised sporting events, the profit margin has increased exponentially. The Texas Longhorns’ football program alone grosses 104 million dollars annually (forbes.com). So, where is all that money going? Most of it goes right back to the school. The athletes who practice for endless hours and devote their lives to the sports get nothing but the satisfaction of winning. So, should Division One college athletes be paid? Division One athletes should be paid because they generate a significant amount of revenue for the school.
For basketball players at the University of Kentucky, their day starts earlier than most other students and ends later than most as well. They wake up early in the morning and have a morning practice and lifting session. After that they go to their classes and study. When that is done they have a mandatory team study hall and watch film. This is then followed by an evening practice and lifting session. They do that 6 days a week for the whole year. These athletes have all the class work and studying of every other student but they also have hours of practice, travel time to away games plus game time added on.
In college athletics there are lots of injuries. During March Madness earlier this year, Louisville guard Kevin Ware suffered a gruesome leg fracture. In college football there is an average of over 20,000 recorded injuries each year. There are 125 FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision) teams with an average of 107 players per team. This averages to each athlete getting an average of 1.25 injuries per year. Not all these injuries are sprained ankles or hangnails however. There are lots of serious season ending ...
... middle of paper ...
...r-worth-578000.html/>.
Manfred, Tony. "Here Are The Odds That Your Kid Becomes A Professional Athlete (Hint: They're Small)." Business Insider. N.p., 10 Feb 2012. Web. 10 Dec 2013.
"National Collegiate Athletic Association." Wikipedia. 08 Dec 2013. Web. 10 Dec 2013. .
"NFL Coaches Salaries." Coaches Hot Seat. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2013. .
"Office of the President." National Collegiate Athletic Association. NCAA, 05 Oct 2005. Web. 12 Dec 2013. .
"Theodore Roosevelt Biography." . Biography.org, n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2013. .
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Wieberg, S. (2008, November 3). Study: College athletes are full-time workers - Study: College athletes are full-time workers - USATODAY.com.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
With the way the NCAA has blown up into a billion dollar industry, does it seem plausible for an academic institution to make this amount of money off of amateur athletes and not provide some other type of revenue besides scholarships? This has been at the forefront of debate as the NCAA continues to make billions off of these so called amateur athletes. The NCAA believes that if compensation is given to student-athletes, the amateurism of the game is taken away. However, many student-athletes believe they should get a piece of the revenue that is being generated off of their name and talents. College athletes should in fact be compensated because the NCAA generates enough revenue to provide the money, it could help students pay for all the
Playing a sport in college is equivalent to working a full-time job (Thomas). There are rules that allow major-college football coaches to only demand twenty hours of the players time each week (Wieberg). However, studies show that those athletes are doubling those hours per week during the season (Wieberg). Other sports are putting in the equivalent of a full time work week (Wieberg). Some NCAA officials are concerned with the amount of time spent stating that beyond forty hours is inhumane (Wieberg). Most of the athletes compete and do whatever it takes to succeed, so they enjoy spending countless hours on sports (Wieberg). Many athletes even have struggles in the classroom because they do not have enough time to study. Student-athletes at top Division I schools think of themselves as athletes more than students (Wieberg). Less than one percent of college athletes actually make it professionally (Wieberg). That means these kids should focus more on their education than on athletics. In reality, these official...
Even the waterboy gets paid! NCAA football is a billion dollar a year empire, in which coaches, executives, school presidents, board members, athletic trainers, athletic directors, equipment managers, Waterboys, towel boys, ball boys, and even team mascots all receive a chunk of the revenue. Everyone gets paid except the athletes, who don’t receive a dime of the money. That’s because it’s against NCAA rules to pay college athletes with anything other than an athletic scholarship; anything else, and it’s deemed as an improper benefit, thus making an athlete ineligible if he/she were to accept. The NCAA defends its rule of “no-pay” by claiming that all its student-athletes are “amateurs” and not employees; therefore, they’re legally not compensated. The argument over whether student-athletes should be paid or not, is particularly unsettling within the sport of football, because NCAA football is the most popular and profitable sport of all college athletics. The NCAA’s discrepancy over whether it should pay its players or not, currently has the association fighting a lawsuit filed by former UCLA basketball star Ed O’Bannon, who’s suing for compensation on behalf of former Division I football and men’s basketball players. The lawsuit challenges the NCAA’s use of student-athletes’ images and likeness for commercial purposes (PBS.org). In recent months the argument has been geared more towards whether current student-athletes should be paid or not, particularly football players, who like former Texas A&M star quarterback Johnny Manziel, provide the athleticism and entertainment that makes NCAA football the million dollar empire that it is. So, should college football players be paid?
College sports is big business, as millions of Americans are heavily invested in the production and consumption of this type of entertainment. Among the various divisions that exist on the collegiate level, the largest is the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The NCAA regulates what division placement each school receives, which schools play which, what athletes and coaches are entitled to, and set forth the regulations under which they play. The big debate is amongst athletes and NCAA and if they should be compensated in their involvement considering corporate sponsors were charged upwards of $700,000 for a 30-second spot in 2015 and where the NCAA earns $6 billion dollars annually. These massive profits have also posed the
There has been a debate recently about College Athletes and if they should be paid. If it was up to me, they should be paid. There are many reasons that I think this. There are also reasons that they shouldn't be paid, but I won't be talking about those a lot. But, there are many benefits to College Athletes being paid.
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
For a while now there had been a disagreement if college athletes should be compensated for their hard work towards their sport. Others argue that college athletes already receive compensation for not having to pay for college tuition. My point of view towards this would be that college athletes should be paid for their contribution towards NCAA. College athletes should be paid because of the multiple injuries they receive, the endless hours of training, and NCAA makes money off the players.
Over the past decades, college athletics have gained immense popularity in the United States. Whether it be basketball, football, baseball, or volleyball. The NCAA is a billion dollar company, but where is all this money going to? For example the University of Kentucky Men’s basketball coach John Calipari has a seven year deal with the school for $52.5 million. Other collegiate coaches are receiving the same amount if not more. However that is not close to all the money the NCAA receives, so still where are they putting the leftover money. How are these coaches receiving so much money, but these players are the ones putting in all the hard work and aren’t seeing a penny of it. The NCAA should be paying these students. They are putting in hours
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
Wake up, go to school, come home, train, come home, eat dinner, do homework, and go to bed. That is the life a college student, who is involved with sports at the college. Most college athletes spend up to 40 hours a week just training. They deserve something from that. College athletes should be paid.
Each year the NCAA (National Collegiate Athlete Association) earns billions in revenue across all college sports, bringing in more money than many professional sports and even many of the countries biggest public companies (Top 10 Reasons college athletes should be paid). However, the student athletes who are the reason behind these earnings do not see any of it in the form of a salary. College athletes should be paid an annual salary due to the countless hours they spend playing their sport while maintaining academic standards, the regulations preventing them from getting a job, and the astonishing amount of money they generate for their school.
Yost, Mark. Varsity Green: A behind the Scenes Look at Culture and Corruption in College Athletics. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2010. Print