Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dangers of cloning
Health concerns of human cloning
Dangers of cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dangers of cloning
Cloning: An Option for Endangered Species Conservation
Review of the Literature
Geneticists know that the technology of cloning lies in the palm of their hands, and its
use on domestic animals and now endangered species has already proven successful (“Endangered
Species”; Fields-Meyer and Seaman;Holt et al.; Lanza et al.; Trivedi). The question I ask now is
this: Will cloning be used in the conservation of endangered species? This very question has
sparked debate between the scientific community and many conservationists. Contrary to the
values set forth by many conservationist groups, my research suggests that the cloning of
endangered species is, in fact, a viable option in their preservation and repopulation. Most of the
sources I have used in my research have supported the idea of using cloning to rebuild animal
populations or at least obtain viable DNA from endangered animals. The prominent scientists
Betsy Dresser, Robert Lanza, and Philip Damiani of the Advanced Cell Technology laboratories in
Worcester, Massachusetts, expressed their optimism about cloning endangered species in the
article "Cloning Noah's Ark." Dresser and Lanza were also quoted in several online news sources
I used as well. They conclude that "Biotechnology might offer the best way to keep some
endangered species from disappearing from the planet" (Lanza et al). As my research suggests,
cloning endangered species will surely have its benefits in keeping these populations alive, an
option which conservationists cannot deny.
These scientists I have mentioned do not ignore opposition to their scientific claims
from conservationists skeptical of the uses of cloning and leery that it usage will deter humans
from restoring natural habita...
... middle of paper ...
...://www.reproduction-online.org.silk.library.umass.edu:2048/cgiLcQntent/
full/127/3/317>.
Lanza, Robert P., Betsy L. Dresser, and Philip Damiani. "Cloning Noah's Ark." Scientific American
283 (2000). Academic Search Premier. 22 Oct. 2005
&db=aph&an=3664004>.
Ryder, Oliver A. "Cloning advances and challenges for conservation." Trends in Biotechnology
20.6 (June 2002): 231. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. DuBois Library, Amherst, MA.
22 October 2005
rect=true&db=aph&AN=7799659&site=ehost-live>.
Trivedi, Bijal P. "Scientists Clone First Endangered Species: A Wild Sheep." National Geographic
News. 29 Oct. 2001.14 Oct. 2005
1/10/1025 TV sheepclone.htm>.
3 Leicht B. G., McAllister B.F. 2014. Foundations of Biology 1411, 2nd edition. Southlake, TX: Fountainhead Press. Pp 137, 163-168, 177-180,
Today, we as a society world wide have a new issue to deal with. Science has discovered the means in which to clone animals, opening a whole new discussion. Many people are inclined to say why would science even wish to peruse this method of research. Lewis Thomas says in his essay "The Hazards of Science"
“Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” (Kass) The concept of cloning continues to evoke debate, raising extensive ethical and moral controversy. As humans delve into the fields of science and technology, cloning, although once considered infeasible, could now become a reality. Although many see this advancement as the perfect solution to our modern dilemmas, from offering a potential cure for cancer, AIDS, and other irremediable diseases, its effects are easily forgotten. Cloning, especially when concerning humans, is not the direction we must pursue in enhancing our lives. It is impossible for us to predict its effects, it exhausts monetary funds, and it harshly abases humanity.
But on the contrary, many scientists believe that cloning can be such a positive achievement, not only for medical purposes, but for fighting extinction. For example, what if they could clone many of the endangered species that exist today? There are very few hundred of many beautiful animals that if something isn’t done to save them, they will be extinct in a few years. So if scientists could successfully clone and create these endangered species, although it would still depend on the clone maturing correctly and being able to reproduce successfully, it could be a great
A compelling issue that has come into focus in the past several years is the idea of human cloning. Many scientists believe that it is inevitable because the technology is there, and anything that can be done eventually will be done. They preach the value of human clones, dropping phrases like 'cure for disease' and 'prolonged life' to entice the public into supporting their cause. Though these concepts seem beguiling, the notion of human cloning, when looked at as a whole, has serious repercussions and should not be entertained lightly. From a strictly scientific point of view, we are just not ready to attempt the cloning of a human being.
Cloning has been a controversial topic since the time it was introduced, prompting questions of ethics. Although it has been unintentionally in use for thousands of years, it was first brought about in the 1960’s. As more and more discoveries have been gained since then, numerous uncertainties continue to be raised among scientists, politicians, and anyone interested in the issue. While the idea of cloning is intriguing and polarizing, there is a fine like that defines what is and isn’t ethical; it is moral to clone cells for research development and plants for agricultural desires, but it is in no way acceptable to clone humans and animals for reproductive reasons.
...ly praised, but science that interferes with the creation of human life is seen by many as entirely different. People are still unsure as to whether or not and to what extent scientists should be involved in such a realm. This is, in fact, the prevailing view. Consequently, the field of human cloning has been shaped by these attitudes. At present, human cloning both nationally and internationally is essentially an unacceptable practice. Whether scientists such as Richard Seed will be successful remains to be seen, but the consensus seems to be that the world is not yet ready for full-blown human cloning. Accordingly, efforts have been made to impede the scientific process and to push human cloning into the distant future.
Hyde, Margaret O., and John Setaro. "Facts And Fantasies About Human Cloning." Medicine's Brave New World. 76. Lerner Publishing Group, 2001. Health Source - Consumer Edition. Web. 4 Nov. 2011.
---. “Animal Cloning—How Unethical Is It?- Final Draft.” UTSA: WRC 1023, 7 Mar 2014. Print.
Another argument pertains to the reliability of cloning. Cloning experts have claimed it is, in fact, an effective procedure. Scientists have admitted it is risky, but also have argued that with time, and more experimentation, cloning will become extremely reliable and effective. However, facts are not as supportive towards this claim as scientists may want. Currently only 3 out of 71 cloning eggs have lived, and only 1 out of 278 fully developed clones have survived from those eggs.
Many people believe cloning is unethical and unusful. They believe that it should not be practiced, because it infringes upon their beliefs. They see cloning as a last resort and do not trust the science of cloning. “Several governments have considered or enacted legislation to slow down, limit or ban cloning experiments outright” (Freudenrich 5). Many people think that cloning a species is a very unideal situation. However the many benefits of cloning far outway the few disadvantages. Cloning endangered species is beneficial to saving most species around the world, in countries like the United States and China, from extinction.
1) Robertson, John A. “Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 119-122.
Seidel, Jr., George E. "Cloning." World Book Student. World Book, 2014. Web. 13 Feb. 2014. source 19
middle of paper ... ... World Book Inc, 2000. Davis, Lloyd S. and John T Darby. Penguin Biology. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., 1990.
The Benefits of Human Cloning In recent years, many new breakthroughs in the areas of science and technology have been discovered. A lot of these discoveries have been beneficial to the scientific community and to the people of the world. One of the newest breakthroughs is the ability to clone. Ever since Ian Wilmut and his co-workers completed the successful cloning of an adult sheep named Dolly, there has been an ongoing debate on whether it is right or wrong to continue the research of cloning (Burley).