BACKGROUND
Charlotte Beers became Ogilvy & Mather's first outsider CEO after its acquisition by WPP Group Plc in 1991. According to her memo dated May 19th, Beers' objective was to "re-invent" the mega-agency, whose inertia and complacency had eroded its competitiveness since the 1980s. In fact, Beer's tenure at Ogilvy constituted a re-creation of the agency, redefining its aims, processes, people, and structure in reaction to the demands placed by the changing advertising industry.
ANALYSIS
The main issue that confronted Beers was initiating and instituting organizational change at the core level. She assumed the leadership of Ogilvy at a time when the organization was internally bleeding. Charismatic founder David Ogilvy's resignation as CEO in 1975 had created a leadership vacuum which none of the succeeding leaders had been able to fill. In addition, the economic boom of the 80s had created a false sense of security that rendered the firm stagnant, unable to either anticipate or react to the changes taking place in the advertising industry. Most significantly, the absence of a strong leader caused the organization to devolve from "One Agency Indivisible" into individually ruled "fiefdoms." The firm's deficiencies came to the fore in 1989-91 when it lost more than $100M of advertising accounts from major firms that had grown tired of the highly politicized organizational environment at Ogilvy.
NEED FOR CHANGE
Since Ogilvy's vision at the time was constrained to "just keep doing the same thing, better," the firm's re-creation was necessitated by external factors & events. For example, the central office had been unwilling to rein in its autonomous local offices' spending after the 1987 stock market crash even as...
... middle of paper ...
... of understanding and commitment to the Brand Stewardship philosophy on the part of lower level employees. In order to provide this support, Beers should better leverage the management team that developed Ogilvy's philosophy in the first place. The problem in 1993 is that CEO Beers and perhaps WCS Director O'Dea appear to be the only executives promoting change. Yet change should not be "pushed" onto the regions from the central office, nor onto subordinates from management. This would be counterproductive, and result in mere conformity. Instead, Beers should establish and train senior managers and local executives as extensions of her leadership. Yielding a degree of objective empowerment to gain symbolic empowerment, local executives could then help Ogilvy's lower level employees redefine their roles & responsibilities to promote the Brand Stewardship strategy.
Many organizations began as a singular vision of an individual. Someone identifies a market deficiency, impassioned purpose, or perhaps a new technology. Whatever that catalyst has been, these individuals decide to devote their efforts to the idea and create a company or organization that seeks to work towards this vision. However, what occurs when the founding individual steps away and the organization remains? This is the question explored in a case study created by Terri Patkin entitled, “Discord at the Music School” (Patkin, 2007). In this study, the protagonist, Carole, becomes the new director of the Bow-strings Music School, replacing the revered founder, Wendy. This story chronicles Carole’s experiences of frustration and ineffectiveness
When Jim Kilts showed up at Gillette in 2001, the first outsider to run the Boston-based company in more than 70 years, he found a business with great brands losing market share. Its acquisitions of Duracell and Braun were not delivering. Sales and earnings were flat, the company had missed its earnings estimates for 15 straight quarters, the stock had plummeted, and Wall Street had lost patience. Yet two-thirds of the top managers were getting top ratings. People were being rewarded for effort; performance, under Mr. Kilts regime, became the new measure.
“People always overestimate how complex business is. This isn’t rocket science. We’ve chosen one of the world’s most simple professions.” In Jack Welch’s words, business is simple. A leader needs to supply his employees with the information, the resources, the vision, and the atmosphere to succeed and reward them when they do. Welch does not concern himself with the details of GE’s many business units; he only needs to ma...
Durk I. Jager was named CEO in January 1999 but tried to accomplish too much too fast. Jager entered into this position at a very difficult time in P&G's history and tried everything he knew to keep the company going. He introduced new high end products, which did not fit within P&G's culture. His solution to keep P&G going was to cut costs, however this was not a long term solution. He alienated the employee population in 17 short months. Acknowledging Jager's failure, P&G's board forced him to submit his resignation.
...the changes that were made could give a guarantee for the long-time prosperity. Schenck made a huge work, which could not be made by the founders, but these improvements were largely associated with the industry as a whole. Managerial changes of the firm tightened the inside control and helped to pursue new goals. However, technology was moving forward as well as the taste and the demand of the public. In such circumstances the right management of the company was no longer enough. The company had to adapt to the rapidly changing industry and be able to compete with other big players.
The founders hired a CEO to continue guiding the company on the path towards success but realized too late that they overlooked an important component. The CEO lacked the character and traits needed to positively develop and lead the company and its people. After facing a major decline in customer service and an uptick in employee turnover, The Home Depot realized that it needed to resort back to the basic guiding principles. They must choose a leader that buys into the same vision and philosophy that the company was built upon. The leader must behold the same values that were cherished by the founders and must be willing to invest in nurturing the culture, the associates and customers.
During the 1990s, each company experienced specific difficulties to their market share. Both companies struggled to reestablish themselves in the global consumer electronics world. As the year 2000 came around, new CEOs at both companies came up with even more complicated initiatives and reorganizations.
Corning shifted their focus from a domestic and exporting company to a multinational manufacturing company. The lack of specialization and ambiguous leadership imposed by the Houghton family faced the problem of a required organizational structure change. However, changing the corporate structure while imposed by these demands led to an inefficient structure hybrid structure that refuses to give specialized responsibilities to MacAvoy as a Chief Operating Officer, as he has to not only watching over operations globally, but is solely in charge of the North American market, creating an inefficiency with the Chief International Officer.
Adolph Coors is one of the most successful and long-standing brewing companies in the industry. Their ability to adapt to the changing dynamics and circumstances of their consumers has supported their achievements since their opening in 1873. Maintaining success in any industry for over a century requires constant innovation and a dedication to improvement and development. While Coors’ overall history depicts their evident care and ability to give consumers what they want, sometimes before they know they want it, there was a period in which their lag in progression could have more greatly affected their business. From 1975-1985, the fourth generation of the Coors family redeemed the company from their period of reactive business decisions
Ogilvy was founded in 1948 by British ad pioneer David Ogilvy who now stands as a legend within the advertising world. After being out of advertising for ten years, Ogilvy started his own agency which was financially assisted by his brother Francis. S. H. Benson Ltd., another London shop, also invested $45,000, but insisted that Ogilvy hire someone who knew how to run an agency. Ogilvy appointed himself vice president in charge of the business opened as Hewitt, Ogilvy, Benson & Mather (HOB&M) and hired Anderson Hewitt from J. Walter Thompson to be the president,
Kitchen, P. J., & D.E. Schultz, 1998. IMC – a UK ad’ agency perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 14, pp. 465-485.
[1] Aaker, D.A. and Jacobson, R. (1996) Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free Press.
Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper &
This paper will explore how the company is fairing under the leadership of its current CEO, Andrea Jung. There are two opposing views regarding the company's current and future success. One group feels that the firm has a promising future with Jung at the helm while the other group does not. This paper will analyze the pros and cons uncovered by each team member and discuss which view prevailed in the debate and why.
...& MAKLAN, S. 2007. The role of brands in a service-dominated world. Journal of Brand Management, 15, 115-122.