Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy of charismatic leadership
Short note on concern about charismatic leadership
Short note on concern about charismatic leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophy of charismatic leadership
Charisma as a Political Instrument
*Works Cited Missing*
Charisma is a quality of an individual personality that is considered
extraordinary, and followers may consider this quality to be endowed
with supernatural, superhuman, or exceptional powers or qualities.
Whether such powers actually exist or not is irrelevant – the fact
that followers believe that such powers exist is what is important.
Charismatic leadership has emerged in all places and in all historical
ages. For example, we have the Kwaio ‘Big Man’ of Melanesia (Sahlins,
1963) compared to the black ghetto in Chicago (Kochman, 1960’s).
First and foremost, since the task is to define how charisma can be
used as a political instrument, it is important to discuss
‘functionalism’. Bronislaw Malinowski introduced the concept of
Functionalism. It is universal theory and posits that all cultural
“traits” are functionally interrelated and form an integrated social
whole. In addition, it posited that all parts of society functioned to
satisfy the individual's biological needs (in this case, seeking
power, or generally gaining an advantage over another). Functionalism
was thus a less system-oriented theory than structural functionalism
and more oriented towards the individual. It was also more open toward
social change.
The political leaders of Melanesian societies are characteristically
‘big men’, individuals who have acquired power because of their
personal qualities and their personal achievement. There is a constant
competition, a constant yearning for upward mobility between the men
of the village to achieve the statues of ‘big man’. They aspire to
make decisions on behalf of the village and wish to be respected and
powerful – where influence, authority, and leadership in the secular
affairs come from success in mobilizing and manipulating wealth. A Big
Man’s objective to gain popular loyalty and enthusiasm comes from his
charisma and his ability to make people obligated to him by
contributing to their feasts, financing marriages, and otherwise
Functional theory is the defined as a framework for building theory that sees society complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. Augusta Comte and Herbert Spence looked at society as a living organism. For example, an animals or person has organs that function together so does society. Organic solidarity is social unity based on a division of labor that results in people depending on each other. Emile Durkheim developed organic solidarity to explain individuals’ workers to specific bodily organs and a group of people to a body. Different bodily organs serve different functions, without these organs the body would die, and so would the individual organs. Some of the different functions are education, religion, economics, and family. In a society individual workers perform different kinds of labor, without which society could not function, nor could individual workers succeed.
Power is both a mental and physical characteristic that people define through knowledge, strength, and money. People who embody these traits are exceedingly hard to come by and almost cease to exist. In today’s age it is a demanding task to find a person who has absolutely mastered a specific trade. For an individual to become powerful they must acquire a vast amount of knowledge in that subject area to convince others and prove their arguments factual. A knowledgeable being will have a sharp edge over competitors allowing them to rise to the top, leaving opponents in the dust. People who have obtained a substantial amount of strength are more likely to be successful when attempting tasks and missions. An individual who has strength has more stability, courage, and fortitude. A person who displays these attributes has what it takes to control large amounts of people as well as face those people in a devastating situation. In this society it is impossible to gain access to power without one very valuable resource. Most people spend a rather large portion of their day either carrying, counting, or spending this power-granting asset. With money an individual can purchase anything they desire and prove status to other lowlife humans. The more money a person has, the more materialistic goods they can possess. Many people who have very large quantities of...
There are two major sub-schools of modern functionalism; macro-functionalism and micro-functionalism. Macro-functionalism focuses primarily on breaking down large scale systems such as societies or civilizations and making t...
Functionalism developed out of the positivist observation that 'all positive speculations owe their first origin to the occupations of practical life' (Comte, 1865, pg 11) and the boundaries of scientific knowledge can not go further than empirically observable truths and views societies as holistic systems where 'the whole is greater than the sum of its parts' (Taylor et el, 1997, pg 662). Functionalist analysis draws on three assumptions essentially seeking to transform society into a theoretical system of reality. The first assumption is that there are zero independent parts operating within the system, secondly that the parts identified need to be understood in terms of their contribution to the functioning of the system and, finally, that the constituent parts have a positive function, or role to play, in the systems overall functioning and effectiveness (ibid, pg 668).
The Great Man theory of leadership assumed that personal attributes of a great man determined the course of history (Denmark, 1993). The great man was thought to have distinctive and exceptional features and traits that distinguished him from his followers (Bass, 1990). Only very few people were thought to have such abilities, which were believed to be inherent, in other words, leaders were born with these qualities (Denmark, 1993).
Functionalism is the oldest and most commonly used theoretical approach used to understand social issues. Functionalism is a macrosociological perspective that presents the idea that society consists of different components working together to help a society function as one. Sociolog...
There are always people who, in a group, come out with better qualities to be a leader than others. The strongest people however, become the greater influences which the others decide to follow. However, sometimes the strongest person is not the best choice. Authors often show how humans select this stronger person to give an understanding of the different powers that people can posses over others.
Charisma is “compelling attractiveness or charm that can inspire devotion in others”. Leaders everywhere rule with charisma, after all, they are leaders for a reason. Leaders get elected by people who love them or fear them, but regardless, they spark some devotion inside of a person. Although not everyone loves them, enough people do. In Julius Caesar, Julius was loved by most, if not all, of Rome.
middle of paper ... ... the consideration of power and who has it. Functionalist, of course agree with it as their theory of the causes and effects of the various parts and functions that maintain the system. In conclusion I believe that the usefulness of the biological analogy is very useful because the logic behind it is just in that the system does need the organs to work together in order to produce social harmony.
The term functionalism is used to explain social events in terms of the functions that they perform. The functionalist approach is also used to show how something affects the continued existence of society. A functionalist approach to gender inequality shows us that gender dominant careers help society continue to function, but we can already see the long term effects of how gender inequality has created issues in today’s society. Even after all of the massive...
Emile Durkheim’s Functionalist Theory is predicated on the ideologies that society is composed of components that are dependent on each other. Auguste Comte developed functionalism; Durkheim compared society to the human body. The body consists of different, interrelated organs that support it to survive; society consists of different workings that enable it to survive. There is a state of stability within society and if any component of that society alters it will reorganize itself to maintain stability. Functionalism will interpret the components of society in terms of contributions to the stability of the whole society. Social accord, direction and integration are paramount views of functionalism; society will endure and grow due to the shared norms and values; all individuals have a goal and vested interest to conformity and thus conflict is minimized (Pope, 1975).
Additionally, there have been many people who have contributed to the functionalism perspective. One of the biggest contributors to the functionalism perspective was Emile Durkheim. Durkheim was interested in how society is able to function/remain stable for long periods of time. It was very important for him to know what kept society together; such as, ideas, beliefs, and traditions (Crossman).
A charismatic leader uses power to serve others; aligns vision with followers’ needs and aspirations; considers and learns from criticism; stimulates followers to think independently and to question the leader's view; uses open, two-way communication; coaches, develops, and supports followers; shares recognition with others; relies on internal moral standards to satisfy organizational and societal interests. (Howell & Avolio, 2011)
1999). A basic definition of functionalism would be the study of the social and cultural
Weber defined charismatic leadership as “resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patters or order revealed or ordained by him”. (QUOTE) Northouse defines charismatic leadership the same as transformational leadership. Many of history’s prominent leaders have been considered to be charismatic leaders. The question is often raised if charismatic leaders are formed by their surrounding environment or if the characteristics of a charismatic leader are innate and decided before birth. While the definitive opinion of Northouse on the debate is unknown, Weber believes the ability to be a charismatic leader is a divine right and of superhuman origin. While the origin of the ability to be charismatic is still looming, there is one thing that is for certain, charismatic leaders are extremely effective. Charismatic leaders are generally followed by those who unquestionably have faith in them. The followers relinquish all forms of independence from their follower and truly believe in them. These leaders have the ability to “run the room” so to speak, and they are able to captivate a room merely by their powerful and warming personality. Weber surrounds his theory around charisma being the idea that it is not a trait but rather a working and outstanding relationship between the leader and the followers.