Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors influencing divorce
Societal trends on marriage
Factors associated with divorce
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 2002, there was a whopping 955,000 divorces recorded across the nation. Compared to the total in 1950, 385,000, there is no doubt that the divorce rate in American society is only becoming more prevalent. Of course, there are hundreds of reasons for why couples choose divorce, but a large majority of them can be chalked up to major societal changes in the last 100 to fifty years. The research in this paper will examine key transformations in the American way of life that directly affect marriage. For example, liberal divorce laws, economic factors, women’s independence, and religious factors. What makes marriage so vulnerable to these factors is that the changes have been so diverse that it is nearly inevitable that a couple will face at least one of these issues. What’s more is that these aspects of life can impact marriage independently, but they often coincide with one another. There is no one reason to liable for unsuccessful marriages, but rather it is a multifaceted web of various reasons. Although some of these changes in American society have been seen as progress for the nation overall, they can create a complex “snowball effect” in the world of happily ever after.
Possibly the most notable societal change in the last century would be the independence of women. Although this is undoubtedly a positive change overall, it has indeed taken its toll on marriage. Women’s increased role in the workforce has made traditional family life difficult to say the least. The most obvious impact this has on family life is that women no longer stay at home cooking, cleaning and living for their husbands and children. One issue this creates is that
women no longer depend on their husband for a living. It is entirely possible for a ...
... middle of paper ...
...s of divorce"(1893).. American law review (8755-481X), 27, p. 876.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 21 Nov. 2013. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
Coontz, Stephanie (03/01/2007). "The Origins of Modern Divorce.". Family process (0014-7370), 46 (1), p. 7.
Galston, William A (06/01/1996). "Divorce American style.". The Public interest (0033-3557), (124), p. 12.
Lichtenberger, James P. Divorce; a Social Interpretation. New York: Whittlesey House, McGraw-Hill Book, 1931. Print.
Lowenstein, Ludwig F. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2005, Vol. 42 Issue 3/4, p153-171. 19p., Database: Academic Search Complete
Parrillo, Vincent N (01/01/2008). "Divorce" in Encyclopedia of social problems (1-4129-4165-2, 978-1-4129-4165-5), (p. 247).
Sclater, Shelley Day. Divorce: A Psychosocial Study. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 1999. Print.
Introduction A century ago, divorce was nearly non-existent due to the cultural and religious pressures placed upon married couples. Though over time Canadians have generally become more tolerant of what was once considered ‘mortal sin’, marital separation and divorce still remain very taboo topics in society. Political leaders are frowned upon when their marriages’ crumble, religions isolate and shun those who break their martial vows, and people continue to look down on those who proceed to legally separate their households. With that being said, couples do not just decide to get a divorce for no particular reason. There must be something driving them towards marital dissatisfaction and further, driving them towards divorce.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 15 Feb. 2012. Web. 20 Feb. 2014.
Nock SL. 1995. A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. J. Fam. Issues 16:53 76
Spohn, William C., and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead. "The American Myth of Divorce." Santa Clara University - Welcome. Web. 21 Feb. 2011. .
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 04 Feb. 2014. Web. The Web.
Zimiles, H. (2004). Schismatic studies of divorce: Essay reviews of for better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered by e.m. hetherington and j. kelly and of the unexpected legacy of divorce by j.s. wallerstein, j.m. lewis and s. blakesfee. Human development, 47(4), 239-250.
... Union Stability: Preliminary Findings from NSFH2. NSFH Working Paper No. 65. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology. Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. & Waite, L. (1995). Attitudes, values and entrance in to cohabitation versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-632. Horwitz, A. & White, H. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: a study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505-14 Kiernan, K. & Estaugh, V. (1993). Cohabitation: extra marital childbearing and social policy. Occasional paper 17, London: Family Policy Studies Centre. Teachman, J. & Polonko, K. (1990). Cohabitation and marital stability in the US. Social Forces, 69, 207-20. Tucker, J. et al., (2003). Parental divorce: effects on individual behavior and longevity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73, 385-386.
Schoen, Robert, and Vladimir Canudas-Romo. "Timing Effects on Divorce: 20th Century Experience in the United States." Journal of Marriage and Family 68 (2006): 749-58.
Pasley, Kay. “The Long-Term Effects Of Divorce.” Stepfamilies 16.1 (1996): 11. MAS Ultra – School Edition.Web. 26 Feb. 2014.
Robson, Ruthann. "The Reader's Companion to U.S. Women's History: Marriage." Houghton Mifflin Study Center. 19 Nov. 2005. http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/women/html/wh_022200_marriage.htm.
Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1269-1287.
The first significant cause of recent rise in the rates of divorce is that women completely change in roles. In the past, men have to earn whole money to afford the expense of family, whereas woman only do housework, hence women have no money leading to depend on husbands’ money. Because of these situations, it is too difficult for most women to separate from their husbands. Nonetheless, these situations entirely change nowadays. The equality between men and women in roles are very clear at the moment, thus women can work outside to earn money, while men share the household tasks such as cooking, cleaning, washing as well as caring for children. It can be clearly seen that women are independent from money as they can earn money by themselves to support their living cost. Accordingly, the divorce rates recently rise.
Marriage and cohabitation play a central role in how family life is carried out. The way in which society views marriage and cohabitation is changing as individualism becomes an increasingly mainstream ideal. Marriage rates have decreased significantly on average over the past 60 years, but different groups show different rates of change. While certain sects each have their views, the general trends are showing decreasing marriage rates in lower income individuals, and increasing marriage rates in higher income educated individuals. These rates are directly connected to racial-ethnic groups, leading to larger gaps in socioeconomic status.
United States, having the highest marriage rate, is not surprisingly the leaders in divorce. (NationMaster.com/people/statistics), (Divorcerate.org). One of the leading causes of divorce is unh...
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rep. N.p., 26 Sept. 2013. Web. 11 Apr. 2014.