Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of mind by gilbert ryle opinion
The concept of dualism
The concept of dualism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of mind by gilbert ryle opinion
Gilbert Ryle is well known in the philosophical world specifically as a behaviorist. According to Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy behaviorist are “followers in the ‘ordinary language’ tradition of analytic philosophy, while, for the most part, regarding behavioral scientific hopes as vain, hold views that are, in other respects, strongly behaviorists”(Hauser 1). In the middle of the twentieth century the ordinary language behaviorist movement was strongly covered by Ryle and Wittgenstein. These bright minds established a relationship; “In 1929 Ryle met Wittgenstein and struck up a friendship that profoundly altered the direction of Ryle’s Philosophical thinking”( Stroll 147). Oxford took over for Cambridge as the center of philosophy in the world due to Ryle’s success (Stroll). He is known as logical behaviorist that believes that mental terms can be defined in physical or behavioral terms. Ryle critiques dualism's most notable philosopher Rene Descartes.
In The Concept of Mind, Ryle critiques the mind-body dualism tradition. His ultimate goal was to show Dualism as myth and nothing else. Ryle points out “that people have no trouble in attributing motives, moral values and individuality to people’s actions, it is only when philosophers try to accredit these qualities to a separate realm of ‘mind’ or ‘soul’ that the problems arise (Cohalan, Ryle1949). Behaviourisms philosophical theory summaries; is that being in a mental state is the equivalent to being in a physical state(Cohlan).Ryle uses this as the bases of his criticism of Dualism. Ryle rejects the Cartesian Theory in his book The Concept of Mind and establishes his view heavily the chapter labeled “Descartes’ Myth”. In chapter in the section The Absurdity of the Of...
... middle of paper ...
...ind." Perspectives and Research on Business, Education and Cognitive Science: The Concept of the Mind. N.p., 2005. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Hauser, L. 2005. “Behaviorism”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/behavior/. See especially section on “Ordinary language behaviorism” and section on objections to behaviorism.
Putnam, H. 1967/2012.“The nature of mental states”. In Martinich and Sosa (eds.), Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
Ryle, G. 1949/1992.“Descartes’ myth” (excerpt from The Concept of Mind). In Beakley and Ludlow (eds.), The Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press. Available electronically via Library.
Scott, Alex. "Gilbert Ryle’s The Concept of Mind." N.p., 2003. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
Stroll, A. 2000.Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Columbia University Press. Chapter 6.
Gross, R., 2013. The Science of Mind And Behaviour. 6 ed. London: Hodder Education .
Passer, M., Smith, R., Holt, N., Bremner, A., Sutherland, E., & Vliek, M. (2009). Psychology; Science of Mind and Behaviour. (European Edition). New York.
The desire to avoid dualism has been the driving motive behind much contemporary work on the mind-body problem. Gilbert Ryle made fun of it as the theory of 'the ghost in the machine', and various forms of behaviorism and materialism are designed to show that a place can be found for thoughts, sensations, feelings, and other mental phenomena in a purely physical world. But these theories have trouble accounting for consciousness and its subjective qualia. As the science develops and we discover facts, dualism does not seems likely to be true.
Evolutionary psychology is a specialist field within the spectrum of psychological enquiry, which seeks to examine and understand some of the predominant reasoning behind the concept of why the human species, whilst biologically similar to other species on the planet, is so very distinct in terms of intelligence and mental progression; demonstrated by the multifaceted and complex social structures we have created. Primary to this domain of evolutionary psychological interest is the notion of ‘theory of mind’, which was developed and advocated by Premack and Woodruff (1978), and has been the topic of fierce discussion and analysis since. It has resulted in manifold research studies and commentaries, regarding the topic, from an extensive range of sources within the academic field of psychology. This essay intends to explore the concept of theory of mind, using examples and research studies to fathom its relevance, application and significance within evolutionary psychology as a whole.
Gross, R (2010). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour. 6th ed. London: Hodder Education. p188.
Rorty, Amélie. 1980. "Where Does the Akratic Break Take Place". Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 58, No. 94: 333-346. in Action. Essays in the Philosophy of Mind. Boston: Beacon Press.
Numerous speculations have been advanced to clarify the relationship between what we call your mind and your brain. They incorporate Jackson and Nagel 's journey to oppose recognizing what we call 'mental
While the great philosophical distinction between mind and body in western thought can be traced to the Greeks, it is to the influential work of René Descartes, French mathematician, philosopher, and physiologist, that we owe the first systematic account of the mind/body relationship. As the 19th century progressed, the problem of the relationship of mind to brain became ever more pressing.
Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, self and society and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The development of higher mental processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Speculations on the origin of the mind have ranged from ghosts to society. Each new theory brings about more speculation and disagreement than the last. Where the mind resides, where it came from and if the brain has any involvement with the concept are common questions that fuel theory paradigms. Those questions are also the foundation of the debate about the roll of experience versus the existence of innate capacities. Steven Pinker theorizes the mind as a computing system created by the brain to fill the gap between innate capacities and capacities missing using common sense and learned critical thinking skills.
Behaviorism is a learning theory or a developmental theory that measures observable behaviors that are produced by the learner’s response to stimuli. On one end of the spectrum behaviorism is known as an attitude. At the other end, it is known as a doctrine. According to the behavioral views of human development, behaviorists argued that to focus attention on unobservable constructs, such as emotions, thoughts, or the unconscious, was an unscientific approach.(Craig & Dunn, Ex.: 2010)
Ryle, in his seminal work, The Concept of Mind, begins by stating the official doctrine of Cartesian dualism, “which hails chiefly from Descartes, is something like this. With the doubtful exception of idiots and infants in arms every human being has a body and mind. Some would prefer to say that every human being is both a body and a mind. His body and his mind are ordinarily harnessed together,...
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind In Society:the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
Gilbert Ryle’s The Concept of Mind (1949) is a critique of the notion that the mind is distinct from the body, and is a rejection of the philosophical theory that mental states are distinct from physical states. Ryle argues that the traditional approach to the relation of mind and body (i.e., the approach which is taken by the philosophy of Descartes) assumes that there is a basic distinction between Mind and Matter. According to Ryle, this assumption is a basic 'category-mistake,' because it attempts to analyze the relation betwen 'mind' and 'body' as if they were terms of the same logical category. Furthermore, Ryle argues that traditional Idealism makes a basic 'category-mistake' by trying to reduce physical reality to the same status as mental reality, and that Materialism makes a basic 'category-mistake' by trying to reduce mental reality to the same status as physical reality.