Can Intelligent Design be Empirically Proven

2740 Words6 Pages

There are diverse embodiments of counterfeit science, cheap science, and deviant science. Over time, mankind has seen the rise and fall of various scientific fields of study. However, none ever seem to vanish completely. Humanity’s views of the flat earth, astrology, crop circles, ancient astronauts, and perpetual motion continue to gain advocates even today. These are compelling paradigms of how human beings possess the ability to hold on to various forms of reasoning without any use of appurtenant evidence. With that being said, the matter of intelligent design and its counterparts, Darwinism, evolution and creationism, are noteworthy topics to discuss.
For centuries, there have existed two major rival conjectures surrounding the causation of life in the universe: evolution and creationism. The concepts of evolution give the world of science a basic inference on how the cosmos came into existence. Creationism offered a plethora of religions an explanation as to how the universe came about. These two concepts on the beginnings of life once stood alone as concrete explanations of creation for quite some time, nevertheless, the idea of intelligent design appeared. What exactly is intelligent design? What is being claimed? These are all questions that often come to mind when the topic of intelligent design is proposed. According to William A. Dembski, author of the book, Intelligent Design, “intelligent design is three things: a scientific research program that investigates the effects of intelligent causes; an intellectual movement that challenges Darwinism and its naturalistic legacy; and a way of understanding divine action” (13). Intelligent design for this reason traverses empiricism and theism (Dembski, 13). The claims that a...

... middle of paper ...

... Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1982. Print.
Coyne, Jerry A. Why Evolution Is True. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.
Monastersky, Richard. "Seeking The Deity In The Details." Chronicle Of Higher Education 48.17 (2001): A10. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
Pigliucci, Massimo. Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2010. Print.
Young Matt, and Taner Edis. Why Intelligent Design Fails: A scientific Critique of the New Creationism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP, 2004. Print.
Sarfati, Jonathan. "The Universe Is Finely Tuned for Life." The Universe Is Finely Tuned for Life. Creation Ministries International, Apr. -May 1997. Web. 03 Nov. 2013.

Perakh, Mark. "The Anthropic Principle and the Big Bang: Natural Or Supernatural? A Simple Probabilistic Answer." The Skeptical Inquirer Sep 2004: 41-5. ProQuest. Web. 5 Nov. 2013 .

Open Document