Throughout the history of the world, people have been concerned with what it is to live a moral life. Many answers have been put forth for this question, but the best by far is found in the Christian Bible. This is because the Bible is a revelation from the Creator. While people can grope in the dark to find answers to moral questions by looking at natural law, they are always frustrated because the real nature of the world we live in is fallen and corrupt. We have an adversary who tries to deceive us and minds that are easily deceived. Even at our most rational, we make mistakes in logical inference, and need to be corrected. In this paper, we will look at biblical ethics in terms of meta-ethics, deontology, virtue theory, and consequences. Then we will see how these theories relate to the Ten Commandments.
Meta-Ethics
First of all, ethical statements are propositions, capable of being either true or false. They are not simply exclamations of emotion, nor are they descriptions of the beliefs of the person making them. Ethical statements correspond to objective features of the world – namely, that the Creator Trinitarian God has revealed that things are either good or bad, right or wrong. This implies an obligation to do what is good or right and to not do what is bad or wrong. This is commonly known as divine command theory.
The most common objection to divine command theory was raised as early as Plato in his dialogue, the Euthyphro, where he asks “Does God (in Plato’s case, the gods) command things because they are good, or are things good because God commands them?”1 In response to this, the first thing to note is that it is a much bigger problem for Euthyphro than it is for a Christian, since Euthyphro envisioned a pleth...
... middle of paper ...
...so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything” (Jam. 1:4). Without the divine command, there would be no way to evaluate virtue, but without virtue, and that only by the work of the Holy Spirit in our hearts, there would be no real keeping of God’s law. In all of this, we look forward to the consummation of the Kingdom of God, when “they will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:9, NIV).
Works Cited
Groothuis, Douglas. “Foundations for Christian Ethics: Old and New Testaments.” Class notes, Christian Ethics and Modern Culture, Spring 2009.
Plato. Classics of Western Philosophy, 4th ed., Edited by Stephen M. Cahn. Euthyphro. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995.
Rae, Scott B. Moral Choices: An Introduction to Ethics, 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2000.
Plato, Phaedo, In: The Collected Dialogues Of Plato Including The Letters, Editors: E. Hamilton and H. Cairns, Bollingen Series LXXI, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1961.
Plato. The Republic. Trans. Sterling, Richard and Scott, William. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1985.
Pojman, L. (2002). 6: Utilitarianism. Ethics: discovering right and wrong (pp. 104-113). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Plato. The Republic of Plato, 2nd edition. Translated by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books, 1991.
Plato, and G. M. A. Grube. "Phaedo." Five Dialogues. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 2002. 93-
Plato. (1992). Plato Republic. (G. Grube, & C. Reeve, Eds.) Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.
Nielsen, Kai. “Traditional Morality and Utilitarianism.” Ethics: The Big Questions. Ed. James Sterba. Blackwell Publishers, 1998. 142-151.
Pinckaers, Servais. The Source of Christian Ethics. Translated by Sr. Mary Thomas Noble. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995.
"Plato." The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces, Volume I. 6th ed. NY: W.W. Norton and Co., 1992. 726-746.
Plato, Phaedrus, trans. R. Hackforth, in Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, eds. The Collected Dialogues of Plato (New York: Pantheon, 1966).
Plato, The Symposium Translation by Benjamin Jowett as part of The Works of Plato (New York n. d.) in Candace Ward (ed.), Plato: Symposium and Phaedrus (New York 1993).
Consequently we ask the question where does the idea of the Bible effecting Christian ethical decision making stop having unlimited interpretation. Interpretation can keep on being made of the biblical texts in so many different ways. A Christian living in today’s modern society who is practicing with the Bible as the role of how they base their ethical decisions has many things to consider. Mainly direct and indirect interpretation is to be had of the old and new testaments. Bringing the Bible stories and parables into context helps modern Christians to understand and live out ethically correct lives by applying it to the situation they are in.
Charlesworth, Matthew. "The Covenants in the Old Testament." Academia.edu. N.p., 28 Nov. 2011. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
1. "The Internet Classics Archive | Phaedo by Plato." The Internet Classics Archive | Phaedo by
When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.