Questioning one’s own self for the success or failure of the learning process in the classroom in terms of attitudes, beliefs, values, traditions and pedagogy is not only an essential ingredient of teaching profession but it also helps an individual to be a valuable resource of a prosperous society. Theorists have named this self-evaluation as reflection and have given different perspectives and processes to define and practice it. It is necessary for an individual to understand the process of reflection and its types based on the time factor for the reflective action. The importance of reflective practice is so much emphasized that it is considered as a bedrock activity for the teaching identity. For some individuals it is an inborn property but anyone can master the skill of reflective practice by using the strategies and tools provided to accomplish the goal of continuing professional development and lifelong learning. Among the prominent strategies, students’ evaluation forms are the most common source of reflection along with their advantages and limitations. It is vital that a teacher fully understands the concept of reflection, its implementation using different strategies especially students’ feedback and its purpose and significance in work-based learning. So the first step that a teacher needs to take is to comprehend the broad multi-dimensional concept of reflection.
Smyth (1992) observes that the concept of reflection is multidimensional and all individuals attach different unrevealed interpretations with it based on what is good or desirable in their context or culture (p.285). People all around the world have different backgrounds, cultures, values, profession and even languages and based on all these fact...
... middle of paper ...
...cher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pdf
Killen, R. (2013).Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice. Melbourne, VIC: Cengage/Social Science Press.
Kreber, C. & Cranton, P.A. (2000).Exploring the scholarship of teaching. Journal Of Higher Education, 71(4), 476-495.
Larrivee, B. (2000) .Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher, Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293-306.
Loyns, N. (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry. New York, NY: Springer.
Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Smyth, J. (1992).Teachers’ work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 280-290.
Reflection, as explained by Moon (2013), is the process of looking back on an event or experience and thinking about it and learning from it. Reflection, which is learning through experience, is not a new concept. As humans, we naturally reflect on our surroundings and experiences on a day to day basis in order to make sense of them. (Norman, Vleuten and Newble, 2002). In a professional context, reflation is vital for a practitioner to learn and improve their practice. By using their own experiences, practitioners are able to analysis, and in turn, adapt or improve specific areas of practice
I have chosen to use Rolfe et al’s (2001) framework for reflective practice, as I felt this was the best model for me to reflect on my academic development. I feel this model is the appropriate model as it has allowed me to reflect on what my situation was, what action I needed to take and the results of that action.
A suggestion made by Schon (1991) states that there are two fundamental forms of reflection: reflection-on-action and reflection-in-action. He further defined Reflection-in-action as a means of examining one’s own behaviour and that of others while in a situation (Schon, 1995, 1987). However, Grant and Greene (2001) and Revans (1998), defined reflection-on-action as focusing on identifying negative aspects of personal behaviour with a view to improving professional comp...
Rolfe (2001) claims that reflection- in-action is more advanced form of thinking and leads to more advanced practice. He further describes that is it is a process of what the nurse is always testing theories and hypothesis in a cyclical process while simultaneously engaged in practice (Rolfe, 1993). It means examining behaviour and that of others while in a situation (Schon, 1995; Schon, 1987). “To be able to reflect one must step outside the experience in order to make the observance comprehendible” Gray (1998). “Aziza highlighted (Forum 2; Challenges and debates about reflective practice, Reflection-in-action/practice and Reflection-on-action/practice) that competent nurses encounter an unusual event or “wicked problem”. Rolfe (2014), calls it, the nurse automatically analyse, problem solve and reflects in that instant without even realising it.” Hence, it brings about confidence, skills and knowledge and anticipation in professionals in nursing. Professionals are accountable for their actions and in this case students, and new nurses would have an opportunity to think what could have been better to improve the
This essay will explore the authors meaning of reflection, how various reflective styles can benefit the practitioners within their settings, and how important reflection is within Early Years Practice. According to Appleby (2010, p.10), reflection is a generic term which describes various behaviours involving feelings, and thinking about thoughts and experiences, in order to examine issues and develop, new understandings and insights. Reflection within practice allows the practitioner to develop a sense of awareness around their daily activities, and helps them to evaluate how they could evolve these activities further, if the given opportunity was to arise again. Similarly, keeping a reflective journal
This assignment explores these contradictions as well as considering the processes behind the notion of reflective practice. It will then identify key theorists in the field of reflective practice. The theories of Terry Borton, David Kolb, and Graham Gibbs will be summarised. Additionally, the theory of Donald Schön will be investigated
As it mentioned above this reflective essay is based on the main theory on Reflection, which is the Honey and Mumford’s learning styles that was developed from Kolb’s work. This is based on four stages of specific styles of learning:
According to Driscoll (2000), there are three processes when reflecting on one’s practice. They are: ‘What?’, ‘so what?’ and ‘Now what?’ Using Driscoll’s reflective cycle will enable me to link theory to practice.
Schön (1987) in his work identifies two types of reflection, these are reflection-in-action (thinking on your feet) and reflection-on-action (retrospective thinking). He suggests that reflection is used by practitioners when they encounter situations that are unique, and when individuals may not be able to apply known theories or techniques previously learnt through formal education.
Reflection is the process of reviewing an experience in order to describe analyse, evaluate and so inform learning about practice (Reid 1993). There are many reflective models that I could have used, including Johns (2004), Driscoll (2000), Atkins and Murphy (1994), Kolb’s (1984), and Gibbs (1988).
The ability to become reflective in practice has become a necessary skill for health professionals. This is to ensure that health professionals are continuing with their daily learning and improving their practice. Reflective practice plays a big part in healthcare today and is becoming increasingly noticed.
Without agreement on what reflective practice is, it is difficult to decide on teaching‑learning strategies. Reflective practice may be a developmental learning process (Williamson 1997), may have different levels of attainment (Wellington 1996), and may be affected by a learner’s cognitive ability (James and Clarke 1994), willingness to engage in the process (Bright 1996; Haddock 1997), and orientation to change (Wellington 1996). However, there does seem to be some agreement that critical reflection consists of a process that can be taught to adults. Brookfield (1988) identified four processes central to learning how to be critically reflective: assumption analysis, contextual awareness, imaginative speculation, and reflective skepticism.
Reflection within early year’s settings and schools allows for the practitioner to think about the work that is being completed either whilst doing it or after it has occurred, the reflection allows for seeing how the work has gone or whether it needs to be changed for future practice. Schön is a key writer about reflection and illustrates the differences between reflection in action, reflection on action and reflection whilst completing the task. The above critical skills help all practitioners to develop understanding as they hugely impact on others lives, if this skill is not engaged in then practice could be effected (Leeson, 2004).
Whitton, D., Barker, K., Nosworthy, Sinclair, C., Nanlohy, P. (2010). Learning for teaching: Teaching for learning. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning
Killen, R. (2007). Effective Teaching Strategies, Lessons from Research and Practice. (4th .ed). South Melbourne: Thomson.