The Balancing Act Between Freedom & Security

1009 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Explain what the usa patriot act stand for

Introduction The USA Patriot Act came about after 9/11. The Act remains in use today with some slight modifications. On the other hand, FISA has been in use since the mid-1970s. Both Acts are highly controversial and are foreign to the average citizen. National security always requires a balancing act between freedom and security. As the saying goes, freedom is not free. This paper will describe the primary elements and / or components of the USA Patriot Act and FISA and research how the media has conveyed the main messages and elements of both acts. It will go on to discuss the media portrayal and general public perception of these acts. The paper will close with a discussion based on whether I believe the nation is more secure with these acts in place. The USA Patriot Act The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, otherwise known as the USA Patriot Act of 2001, President Bush signed into law October 26, 2001. The act is a response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States. Not without controversy, the act allowed for surveillance of citizens and non-citizens alike all to detect and prevent terrorist activities within the borders of the United States. It extended powers to the Justice Department deemed necessary to combat what “had not existed before. The presence of terrorists within national borders along with the need to apprehend and prosecute them, hopefully before rather than after they acted” (Rouse, 2010). The broad reach of the act allowed for message interception, telephone line taps or any form of communication deemed relevant in the ongoing fight against terrorist activity in the United States. Foreign Intelligence Su... ... middle of paper ... ...n Surveillance Intelligence Act. Retrieved from https://ssd.eff.org/foreign/fisa Reporters Committee. (n.d.). Introduction - Criminal proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.rcfp.org/first-amendment-handbook/introduction-criminal-proceedings Reporters Committee. (2013). Reporters Committee, media organizations challenge FISA court ruling on right to challenge secrecy. Retrieved from http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-committee-media-organizations-challenge-fisa-court-ruling-right-challenge-secrecy Rouse, M. (2010). Patriot Act. Retrieved from http://searchdatamanagement.techtarget.com/definition/Patriot-Act Zuckerman, J., Bucci, S., & Carafano, J. (2014). 60 Terrorist plots since 9/11: Continued lessons in domestic counterterrorism. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/60-terrorist-plots-since-911-continued-lessons-in-domestic-counterterrorism

Show More
Related

  • Sacrificing Freedom for Security

    1407 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our nation seems as if it is in a constant battle between freedom and safety. Freedom and security are two integral parts that keep our nation running smoothly, yet they are often seen conflicting with one another. “Tragedies such as Pearl Harbor, 9/11 and the Boston Marathon bombings may invoke feelings of patriotism and a call for unity, but the nation also becomes divided, and vulnerable populations become targets,” (Wootton 1). “After each attack a different group or population would become targets. “The attack on Pearl Harbor notoriously lead to Japanese Americans being imprisoned in internment camps, the attacks on 9/11 sparked hate crimes against those who appeared to be Muslim or Middle Eastern,” (Wootton 1). Often times people wind up taking sides, whether it be for personal freedoms or for national security, and as a nation trying to recover from these disasters we should be leaning on each other for support. Due to these past events the government has launched a series of antiterrorist measures – from ethnic profiling to going through your personal e-mail (Begley 1). Although there are times when personal freedoms are sacrificed for the safety of others, under certain circumstances the government could be doing more harm than good.

    Read More

  • Government Surveillance vs Privacy

    1439 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is the American government trustworthy? Edward Joseph Snowden (2013) released to the United States press* selected information about the surveillance of ordinary citizens by the U.S.A.’s National Security Agency (N.S.A.), and its interconnection to phone and social media companies. The motion picture Citizenfour (2014), shows the original taping of those revelations. Snowden said that some people do nothing about this tracking because they have nothing to hide. He claims that this inverts the model of responsibility. He believes that everyone should encrypt Internet messages and abandon electronic media companies that track personal information and Internet behavior (op.cit, 2014). Snowden also stressed to Lawrence Lessig (2014) the importance of the press and the first amendment (Lessig – Snowden Interview Transcript, [16:28]). These dynamics illustrate Lessig’s (2006) constrain-enable pattern of powers that keep society in check (2006, Code: Version 2.0, p. 122). Consider Lessig’s (2006) question what is “the threat to liberty?” (2006, p. 120). Terrorism is a real threat (Weber, 2013). Surveillance by social media and websites, rather than the government, has the greater negative impact on its users.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The US Patriot Act

    267 Words  | 1 Pages

    The U.S.A Patriot Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism, was an act of congress that was signed by President George W. Bush in October of 2001. The act was in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. The act is meant to help government agencies identify and prevent possible terrorist attacks and sponsorship of terrorist groups (Justice, 2015). The law has many pros, but as well countless cons. Some of the pros of the Patriot Act are it assist’s law enforcement in their investigations of terrorist activity, it speeds up investigations on terrorist activity, and it increases security measures. The cons of the act are the amount of authority

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

    291 Words  | 1 Pages

    These types of montitoring have a good side and a bad side. The Patriot Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2001 after 9/11. Its backronym, U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T., which stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.

    Read More

  • Patriot Act Essay

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Patriot Act was signed into law by President George Bush on the 26th October 2001. The act is an Act of congress whose title is a ten letter acronym which stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” (USA PATRIOT Act 2001). The Act was enacted 45 days following the September 11 attacks. The September 11 attacks on the world trade center in New York catalyzed the enactment of a legislation that would provide law enforcement with greater powers to investigate and prevent terrorist activities. The spirit of the act is founded on the notion of providing all that is required by law enforcement, within the limits of the constitution, to effectively combat the war on terror.

    Read More

  • The Patriot Act Protects America

    761 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since September 11, 2001 many people can say that America has changed.  Many people question if America has changed for the better or has it just gotten worse. Since the day those four planes crashed around the United States people’s lives have been changed. Many may not realize how their lives have changed, but with new laws passed life is different within America. The United States Patriot Act is one of the laws passed after 9/11: singed into order on October 26, 2001 just 45 days after the attack. The United States Patriot Act was put in place in order to protect Americans, yet has been affecting American’s civil liberties and caused controversy all over the United States.

    Read More

  • Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    298 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Patriot Act has prevented terrorism inside the United States in numerous cases. It has updated anti-terrorism laws to counter new technology, increased penalties for the acts of terror, and has helped decrypt information between law enforcement and the community. The Patriot

    Read More

  • Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    With America left on its heels President Bush and Congress signed the USA Patriot Act into law in October 2001. The Patriot

    Read More

  • Patriot Act Research Paper

    2858 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Patriot Act’s goal was to “Unit and Strengthen America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.” One of the main goals of this act was to change some of the restrictions Clinton put on law officials. After the act was passed, intelligence officials and law officials were allowed to share information with each other (Patriot Act). The U.S. Secretary General gained more power through the Patriot Act and was allowed to detain and deport terrorist suspects. Another change as a result of the act was much easier access to search warrants. Instead of having to get individual warrants for every location surrounding a case, the Patriot Act allowed one warrant to cover all locations related to one alleged terrorist. By allowing warrants to be passed with such ease it made investigations more timely but also put citizens privacy at stake. These laws reassured the public of their safety immediately after a terrorist attack but, in more current times as technology continues to advance, people feel threatened by the growing power of the

    Read More

  • Patriot Act Research Paper

    1494 Words  | 3 Pages

    After forty-five days had passed since the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001 Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act which stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”. “This Act is a 342-page, sprawling piece of legislation that contains more than 150 sections and amends more than 15 federal laws”(USA). The laws that this act clearly “bypasses” goes completely against the U.S. Constitution which was drafted by bright and experienced men who wrote that document for a clear reason. To make a new government which does not cheat and unfairly treat its citizens. The Patriot Act “steps on every

    Read More

  • Tension between Freedom and Security

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States is in a tricky situation. First and foremost, we are a country that prides itself on being free. Even the fourth amendment to our Constitution declares, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” Yet we are also a country that demands security. Americans expect that our government will keep us safe. These two ideals, freedom and security, are often at odds. How can we expect our government to stop terrorism without infringing on our rights? Recent disclosures, that the government has access to American phone calls and emails, have brought this debate to the forefront of public discourse.

    Read More

  • Critical Infrastructure Protection

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    BENAC, N. (2011). National security: Ten years after september 11 attacks, u.s. is safe but not

    Read More

  • Freedom is the Cost of Stability in Brave New World

    2016 Words  | 5 Pages

    David Grayson once said that "Commandment Number One of any truly civilized society is this: Let people be different". Difference, or individuality, however, may not be possible under a dictatorial government. Aldous Huxley's satirical novel Brave New World shows that a government-controlled society often places restraints upon its citizens, which results in a loss of social and mental freedom. These methods of limiting human behavior are carried out by the conditioning of the citizens, the categorical division of society, and the censorship of art and religion.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On National Security

    1525 Words  | 4 Pages

    The horrific tragedies on September 11, 2001 changed the course of American national security for decades to come. It took a while for Americans to recover from the sadness, loss and confusion of the attacks. The American government knew that Al Qaeda–the terrorist organization that orchestrated the attacks–was still posing a huge threat to our nation’s security.

    Read More

  • Freedom is More Valued than Security

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Some tourists think Amsterdam is a city of sin, but in truth it is a city of freedom. And in freedom, most people find sin.” This might sounds like a section from a travelling guide, but it also describes why we as a society cannot gain complete freedom. Complete Freedom requires all negative repercussions from individual’s actions to be unpunished, making it impossible to allow any form of justice into the community, turning it into a den of criminals. Due to that, a government with security force to help regulate rules is necessary to keep the whole country going without breaking down. However, with great power comes great responsibilities, and most government that is allowed too much power will crack under the pressure and implant complete security to protect their power from being taken by another leader that is not their main choice, or by the public through revolution. A sensible country will not allow its government to achieve either, as both will affect the country significantly in a negative spotlight. However, balancing freedom and security doesn’t take away all the problems, as having same amount of freedom and security is impossible in reality and will soon tip into either side, and having more security than freedom will make citizens protest outside and inside of the area of influence by the government, and the awareness created can lead to tragic aftermath. This is why having more freedom than security while allowing the government to regulate individual actions that can adversely affect others, as total security will lead to totalitarianism and tyranny, allowing more security over freedom will generate resentment severe riot, and, total freedom will lead to chaos and anarchy.

    Read More

More about The Balancing Act Between Freedom & Security

Open Document