Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
sex and violence in movies
sex and violence in movies
sex and violence in movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: sex and violence in movies
I find this "liberated age" morally and intellectually void of any redeeming qualities. I must admit that when I was a teenager life styles were, in comparison, almost puritanical and teenagers felt life was too restrictive. Today the restrictions have indeed been relaxed. In fact I see very little sign of any restrictions on content and explicitness and I find this both annoying and insulting to my concept of decency or morality. I search through the movie listings to find a film that will be enjoyable. No assurance, because most films contain offensive scenes and dirty language that are completely unnecessary and rather than improve the film, undermine its enjoyment. Children today have, in my estimation, pitiable role models to try to find. It seems the lower the mentality and the poorer the performance, the higher the admiration is for it. I don't pretend to know the remedy for this condition. Certainly not censorship; but it seems that more pressure might be put on the entertainment industry to clean up its act and tone down its attempts to see who can deliver the most filth without being sued. A little less PC and more honesty would certainly help. I think it is very disturbing that in the name of freedom of the press we have allowed ourselves to be inundated 24 hours per day by "entertainment" that is not fit for children, much less for adults.
Mary Pipher goes on to say that the problem faced by girls is a ‘problem without a name’ and that the girls of today deserve a different kind of society in which all their gifts can be developed and appreciated. (Pipher,M). It’s clear that cultures and individual personalities intersect through the period of adolescence. Adolescence is a time in a young girl’s life that shapes them into the woman they become. I think it begins earlier than teen years because even the clothing that is being sold for younger girls says sexuality. Bras for girls just beginning in every store are now padded with matching bikini underwear, Barbie dolls are glamour up in such away that these girls believ...
In today’s world of multimedia it has become extremely hard to avoid the introduction of adult themes to younger children, who lack the maturity to process and question the information. Young people are bombarded continually with unsuitable and undesirable concepts that give false images of acceptable behavior. Music, movies, television, internet and video games are accredited with the moral deterioration of present day youth. Great strides have been made to establish rating guidelines, parental controls and warning labels that assist adults in making informed choices on what their children should or should not be able to access but they are not perfect.
Gina Marchetti, in her essay "Action-Adventure as Ideology," argues that action- adventure films implicitly convey complex cultural messages regarding American values and the "white American status quo." She continues to say that all action-adventure movies have the same basic structure, including plot, theme, characterization, and iconography. As ideology, this film genre tacitly expresses social norms, values, and morals of its time. Marchetti's essay, written in 1989, applies to films such as Raiders of the Lost Ark and Rambo: First Blood II. However, action-adventure films today seem to be straying farther away from her generalizations about structure, reflecting new and different cultural norms in America. This changing ideology is depicted best in Oliver Stone's Natural Born Killers (1994), which defies nearly every concept Marchetti proposes about action-adventure films; and it sets the stage for a whole new viewpoint of action in the '90's.
The FCC has created guidelines of indecency and obscenity for broadcasters to use and to judge what content is aired. What qualifies as indecency or obscene differs from person to person due to their personal life experiences, their morals, and upbringing. On the other hand, parents judge indecency or obscenity based on their children and the age of each child. So, what is okay for mommy and daddy to watch or hear may bother them if their child is exposed to it as well. However, is it the government’s job protect everyone’s child from obscene or indecent material? No, that is a parenting issue. But, the FCC still has to balance itself with the First Amendment and the Communications Act. “The First Amendment, as well as Section 326 of the Communications Act, prohibits the Commission from censoring broadcast material and from interfering with freedom of expression in broadcasting. The Constitution’s protection of free speech includes that of programming that may be objectionable to many viewers or listeners.” (FCC, 2008)
According to John Davidson's essay Menace to Society, "three-quarters of Americans surveyed [are] convinced that movies, television and music spur young people to violence." While public opinion is strong, the results of research are divided on the effects of media violence on the youth in this country. Davidson wrote that most experts agree that some correlation between media violence and actual violent acts exists, yet the results are contradictory and researchers quibble about how the effects are to be measured (271). Moreover, Davidson is not convinced that the media is the sole problem of violence, or even a primary problem. He points out that other factors, such as "poverty, the easy accessibility of guns, domestic abuse, [and] social instability" may have a greater impact on a child becoming violent than the influence of the media (277). Even though other forces may be stronger, media violence does have some adverse effects on the members of society. If senseless violence on television and in movies had no effect, it would not be such a hotly debated topic. What type of effects and whom they affect are the most argued aspects of the discussion.
For a long time now the debate has been, and continues to be, as to whether or not violence on television makes children more violent. As with all contentious issues there are both proponents and detractors. This argument has been resurrected in the wake of school shootings, most notably Columbine and Erfurt, Germany; and acts of random violence by teenagers, the murders of two Dartmouth professors. Parents, teachers, pediatricians, child psychiatrists, and FCC Chairmen William Kennard and former Vice President Al Gore say violent TV programming contribute in large part to in violence in young people today. However, broadcasters and major cable TV providers like Cox Communication say that it is the parent’s fault for not making it clear to their kids as what they may or may not watch on TV. The major TV networks and cable providers also state it is the TV industry’s fault as well for not regulating what is shown on TV. So who is the guilty party in this argument of whether or not TV violence influences of the behavior young people in today’s society?
has had countless television shows with a range of celebrities. The E! Network is centralized on celebrities hence why there are many spin off television series. To maintain their connections, Eonline has became biased with certain celebrities. While other media outlets criticize certain celebrities, Eonline will come to their defense or justify their actions. Another member of the community has not been hesitant to express his perspective on biased articles that the E! Network has close ties with. Blogger, Derrick Turner, wrote : “Over the years I’ve noticed ‘E! News’ been very selective in their reporting when it comes to E! stars”. From a personal perspective, I have noticed articles posted on Eonline that minimizes scrutiny with celebrities they have close ties with. For instance, when media around the world scrutinized a relationship between a minor and a 25 year old musician, the E! network was in favor of the relationship. This made me look at the network in a different manner because they favored a relationship that an ordinary person would face jail time for. If the network can overlook the age of consent for celebrities, then they would go as far as overlooking more serious crimes. Maintaining relationships is significant but it should not be at the expense of overlooking morals. The E! Network needs a merge between morals and business so that it allows to remain unbiased.
When families sit down to watch television, they expect to watch family type of shows. Family type shows meaning rated PG or PG13, sitcoms and movies that do not include weapons, killing, foul language, and non-socially accepted actions. When children killing, they start to believe that it is accepted. Do children think that killing and hurting others and themselves have little meaning to the real life, children can become traumatized. Most killers or violators of the law blame their behavior on the media, and the way that television portrays violators. Longitudinal studies tracking viewing habits and behavior patterns of a single individual found that 8-year-old boys, who viewed the most violent programs growing up, were the most likely to engage in aggressive and delinquent behavior by age 18 and serious criminal behavior by age 30 (Eron, 1). Most types of violence that occur today links to what people see on television, act out in video games or cyberspace games, or hear in music. Media adds to the violence that exists today and in the past few decades. It will continue in the future if it is not recognized as a possible threat to our society. When kids go to a movie, watch television, play video games or even surf the web, they become part of what they see and hear. Soaking violence in their heads long enough becomes a part of the way they think, acts, and live. The line between pretend and reality gets blurred.
Violent video games and violent adolescent behavior, is there a connection? Millions of violent video games are sold around the United States, millions more are sold overseas, but the numbers of violent crimes, that could be associated with violent video games is low. Assault, robbery, burglary, rape and murder occur daily. The drug industry accounts for the majority of these crimes. The cases not related to drugs, fall into a number of categories, including Psychological Disorders. Disorders that can cause violent behavior are psychotic or anti-social behavior, depression, schizophrenia, delusion, disassociation, and any others recognized by a Psychologist.
Societies are founded upon traditions, morals, and a set of commonly accepted ethnical values. Such customs are important because they set the tone for centuries and decades that follow. In the United States, violence is widely accepted as a central component of American lifestyle and culture. From contemporary gay bashing to explosives and weaponry in video games and movies, violence figures prominently in many aspects of American entertainment and pleasure seeking.
Today's entertainment is at its most liberal and open-minded state, this can be seen as both good and bad. Some of the programming available is questionable at best, it seems that we have reached a point of no longer having a filter. A point where anything goes, no subject untouchable, of course there are exceptions to this rule. We do still see the occasional outrage at the mention of topics not meant for discussion by those not ready, or willing to address them. It is truly in the eye of the beholder whether we have gone to far or not. The die-hard conservative may shudder at the mention of today's entertainment, and its values. The liberal may smile, and contemplate at the accomplishments that have been made, and the feminist may say, “we have only just begun”. It all boils down to the politically ideology of each and everyone.
The president of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributers Will H. Hays asserted on how their job in the movies industry is as important as that of the clergy man or the teacher in making an impact on the child’s mind, which he described as a “clean virgin thing”, an “unmarked slate” and a “sacred thing” (Forman, 121). What the statistics of the research had shown is that 77 million people assist weekly to movies, and 1/3 of these audiences are constituted of adolescents, amongst whom 11 million are under 14 years old, who are in permanent contact with screen (Forman, 10). Among the 37% who are minor audiences, 70% and more memorize what they encounter on the screen, who will be able to remember what they see with more emphasis throughout
The main cause behind the increase of an obsession with sex is media executives want better ratings and so they will shove more provacative and disturbing images into the public eye. Dan Jaffe, executive Vice President of the Association of National Adertisers claims, "If everyone is really so upset, the no one would be watching. The best test is whether the ratings go down" (qtd. by Clark, "Sex, Violence"). At one point the FOX network was one of the worst at offending and upsetting many different people, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People(NAACP). They tried to get FOX's owner Rupert Murdoch to be denied a broadcast license from the Federal Communications Commission(FCC) stating that the network had "brought the greatest debasement in taste, character quality and decency in television history" (qtd. by Clark, "Sex, Violence"). For more ratings as well as more money, media executives are showcasing more obscenity and indecency than ever before and is having negative effects on teens. T...
you grow older, this doesn't seem to be a problem any longer, even though there
A newer style of entertainment news has arrived in the past decade. Specifically TMZ (which began as an internet news blog) is the premier celebrity gossip news show of the nation. It [TMZ] glamorizes the decadent side of life of many Hollywood stars, musicians, and prominent figures in the entertainment world. It highlights the excessive behavior of people who live a life beyond the reach of most normal Americans. It exemplifies a way of “living above the law” without repercussions for untoward behavior. Rampant drug and alcohol abuse of our “elite” is reported on daily as they check in and out of rehab like hotels. This is also a very invasive and revealing program t...