Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The meaning of art in a simple way
Interpretation of art
Understanding art world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The meaning of art in a simple way
I decided to use Herman Lee for my artist comparison. The first piece that I saw of his was a series about Great Romans and they were portrait pieces. He has five pieces in this series that contain five different Roman people. They happen to be portraits of a person in vector/illustrative style. I decided to use this as a starting block for my piece. Instead of doing a leading figure in our today society as my portrait piece, I chose to do myself. Doing a portrait of yourself to me is harder to manage then doing a portrait of another person. Doing a portrait of yourself is hard to me because it involves figuring out what side of you, as a person, you want to be seen as or what you want to be seen as. You have to show a piece of who you are as a person and be quite vulnerable to the viewers, so I decided to go outside my comfort zone for this piece.
Herman Lee’s Great Romanians series intrigued me because all the portraits have a disperse use of vibrant colors in them, which is similar to my work. The vibrant colors allow for a sense of playfulness and randomness. They way he placed the colors gives a sense that he had fun while making them, as well as giving it a feel of having paint smeared onto the piece randomly, even though it is all done electronically. The piece is “is filled with colors of all sorts that are meant to turn heads (Osnat Tzadok: 2002-2010)” The portraits that he has done for this series are up close and only include the head, with the neck as well. Some other portraits that he has done also included the top portion of their clothes. Herman Lee does all his work on the computer and most of it is in vector/illustrator format.
Since I was going outside my comfort zone for this piece I wanted to display my...
... middle of paper ...
...h what the world is looking for. The only hard part about using someone, so new in this industry is that he doesn’t have a lot said about him, if anything at all. It is a shame that on his site he does not give any reasons or intent about his pieces. He just has the titles of his pieces and a lot of it is assuming what he means by what he is trying to imply. “By trying to decipher the painting in this way, I was doing what I suppose most people do when they look at art, seeking a narrative or at least enough clues to one that I could begin to assemble a story out of what I was seeing. With all art, from the representational to the abstract, one tends to look for correspondences to what one knows; even before learning the title (Michael Milburn: 2009),” which means that I was trying to “to find something recognizable in (Michael Milburn: 2009)” the Great Romanians.
... find the authors’ of my articles arguments very convincing. By weaving both visual and literature evidence together the authors support their arguments almost scientifically. The articles go into more depth than the Gardner text book. Gardner does not provide as much contextual evidence to support his arguments. In this manner the articles I read are a more progressive form of art history. Also, Gardner’s text discusses Witz’s intense focus on realism, but does not discuss his important departures from realism. In actuality, Witz’s departures from realism represent the most significant aspects of the painting. Although we have learned to not read into a work too much, Witz’s hyper deliberate nature requires attention to every detail and is well suited to more than surface level analysis. My analysis of the painting reflects, and supports the author’s conclusions.
Each respective piece of art is no doubt a self portrait, but how each artist is represented in the two pieces is where the contrasting elements come into play. In Portrait
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
Art historian Griselda Pollock, in her documentary entitled The Legend of van Gogh, stated that ‘there are several van Goghs.’ To agree or disagree with this statement, one must firstly understand the point Pollock is attempting to get across. One could interpret this opinion as meaning that there are various artistic styles and several facets of van Gogh’s life that can be critically analysed; having this understanding of Pollock’s attitude toward van Gogh, it would be difficult not to agree with her.
I chose this particular piece of art to critique because of the fact that I walk past it six times a week. The composition and its contents spoke to me, making me want to study it further. After all, North Bay is the city in which I grew up in and this painting contains some of North Bay’s history.
The first element I was able to notice is the rhythm that it has. The first focal point to catch my attention was the shirt. It is the only part of the portrait where color was used. The color of the shirt then moved my attention to the second focal point, the eyes. The eyes are substantially darker than the rest of the portrait. The color of the shirt contrasts the darkness of the eyes. The darkness of the eyes also leads you to the last focal point, the nose. At first glance the nose just appears to be completely black but upon closer inspection you can see the shape of the nose and all the lines that were used to create it. After closely looking at the nose I the noticed the next element, lines. The entire portrait was made out of lines. Each and every line varied in width, direction, and length. The lines were used in an abstract manner since it was used throughout the entire portrait. The following element I noticed was the form of the portrait. While looking at the face of the portrait I noticed that the cheekbones looked as if they were popping out of the frame. I then noticed how the lines were used to shade the outline of the entire body making it appear to be three-dimensional. The next element that became obvious after further inspection was the balance of the portrait. The symmetry and proportionality of the skull is what gave the portrait balance. The features of the face were proportional to each other and the face was symmetrical on both sides of
I absolutely love this piece of art. The amount of color keeps the painting alive and interesting. Its abstractness draws me in and interests me to look at it to find what I may see. One challenging thing about this piece of work is that I am not exactly sure what is going on in
For “Joy of Life,” there is not only so much going on with the design of the characters within the work, but the array of colors within each part make it even busier! The repeated use of color in different scenes makes one search for connection between the characters and between the backgrounds. Also, the colors are coupled with their bold complements at times, creating a little bit of competition. Nevertheless, I think the artist did a great job of balancing the color wheel in this piece. The colors in “Dance,” make for a simpler view as there are not as many busy designs within the color arrangement. It creates space for the viewer to reflect more on other aspects. The characters in this work are connected through very similar color patterns, so their connection is much easier seen and understood. One interesting thing I saw was the disjointed circle formation that was created when the artist kept the hands of two of the individuals unattached. It is not so obvious and distracting because the coloring is not disjointed because another body part replaces the gap. Overall, it is less overwhelming to visually look at than the other work, but this does not mean it is any less overwhelming to
Critical thinking is a very important aspect to understanding art. As David Perkins put it in “The Intelligent Eye”, we must avoid “experimental thinking”, a rash, quick way of thinking based on observations and use “reflective intelligence”, a way of thinking in which a viewer takes their time and dissects details and nuances to fully understand a work of art. A majority of viewers will look at a piece of art and come to a quick analysis of it, without much thought. But, according to Perkins, “The more attentive the observation is, the better the opportunity is for deeper learning” (Perkins 14). As Banksy said in Exit Through the Gift Shop, “the reaction to the work of art is the most important thing about it.” Without a reaction or an opinion, the work of art has no meaning. Therefore, in order to trul...
When I imagine an artist, I picture a Parisian dabbing at a sprawling masterpiece between drags on a cigarette seated in an extravagantly long holder. He stands amid a motley sea of color, great splashes of vermillion and ultramarine and yellow ochre hiding the tarp on the studio floor. Somehow, not one lonely drop of paint adorns his Italian leather shoes with their pointed toes like baguettes.
In Confronting Images, Didi-Huberman considers disadvantages he sees in the academic approach of art history, and offers an alternative method for engaging art. His approach concentrates on that which is ‘visual’ long before coming to conclusive knowledge. Drawing support from the field of psycho analytics (Lacan, Freud, and Kant and Panofsky), Didi-Huberman argues that viewers connect with art through what he might describe as an instance of receptivity, as opposed to a linear, step-by-step analytical process. He underscores the perceptive mode of engaging the imagery of a painting or other work of art, which he argues comes before any rational ‘knowing’, thinking, or discerning. In other words, Didi-Huberman believes one’s mind ‘sees’ well before realizing and processing the object being looked at, let alone before understanding it. Well before the observer can gain any useful insights by scrutinizing and decoding what she sees, she is absorbed by the work of art in an irrational and unpredictable way. What Didi-Huberman is s...
With the three sculptures drawn between Archaic Greek, Classical Greek, and Egyptian cultures, they can be observed and similarities and differences can be made. The Egyptian sculpture is different from the other two sculptures in that it is the only one that involves some clothing; the man is wearing a loincloth and the woman is wearing a straight dress. The other two sculptures are completely naked. There is a difference amongst the three sculptures in how they are positioned. The Egyptian sculpture is in a straight standing up position with clothes on. The Archaic Greek sculpture is in the same straight standing up position with no clothes on. The final sculpture from the Classical Greek culture is in a more free form while still
Both of these artists, Rembrandt and Vincent van Gogh, did self portraits most of their lives. Although they are very distinct from each other based off composition and visual elements, they share a common goal. They drew self portraits because they felt it was their duty to paint themselves in a whole new perspective. Even though they had downfall of their lives, they left their legacy in which many people will cherish for many generations to
Also I hope that I can better appreciate and understand his creation. In another work, In the Tower of Sleep, the center of the picture is a stripped man lying in the trenches, and it looks like the body is became by the continuously gushing liquid. The huge frightened eyes and instruments with hands seemed to exaggeratedly play the terrible music. The messy and horrible shapes combines a strange image, and it is expressed he is pulled into the deep abyss by the endless nightmare. It reminds me of he is wounded in the war, and because the wife is Jewish, they have to hide and be oppressed I like his exaggerates but very vivid expression. Although the picture is very distorted, emotions are fully
In my paper I chose Chuck Close to write about because his art is so extraordinary and creative that his art work is over whelming to me. The way he recreates his self portraits are phenomenal. It is as if you are actually looking at the portraits face to face but really you are not they are just great works of art. The art work I chose is Big Self Portrait which was created in 1968. The detail of the painting was down to the pores, wrinkles, the small facial hairs, the stray of his hair, and so much more. In Big Self Portrait, Chuck looks as if he was bored, depressed, and stressed. In his portrait he looks as if he is bored with life, has a look of depression, and is stressed. These feelings are revealed in the painting because he has a