Every Friday in Japan, the lawn of the office of the Prime Minister fills up with hundreds of Japanese citizens to protest in concern about the country’s ongoing nuclear program in spite of the meltdown of the Fukushima-Daichi power plant. 170 miles north of Tokyo, the meltdown happened in 2011 after a back to back earthquake and tsunami devastated cooling capabilities within the plant, which subsequently led to the meltdown of one of the reactors. This even displaced tens of thousands of people from their homes. (Junko, and Mullen Jethro) Although no deaths have been attributed to the explosion or subsequent nuclear fallout yet, the full repercussions of the event have yet to been fully experienced. A plan is still being developed of how to remedy the situation as nuclear contaminated water continues to seep into the Pacific Ocean. The Fukushima disaster is certainly the worst nuclear event since Chernobyl in 1986 and perhaps will escalate to be worst environmental disaster in our lifetime.
The study of atoms began with the Greek philosophers who devised the concept that matter is comprised of invisible atoms. Centuries later, the implications of this theory were explored by many famous scientists to include Albert Einstein and his theory of relativity. Einsteins counterpart in theoretical physics, Ernest Rutherford, theorized, “If it is possible to control at will, the rate of disintegration of the radio elements, an enormous amount of energy could be obtained from a small amount of matter.” (“History of Nuclear Energy”) The next 40 years were spent trying to do just that, and in 1942, Enrico Fermi and a team of notorious physicists created the first sustainable nuclear reaction. Since that time, the history of nuclear energy ...
... middle of paper ...
...ned Scientists National Headquarters. Web. 9 Dec 2013.
United States. Department of Energy. Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste. Washington D.C.: , 2013. Print.
"Position Paper: Nuclear Power and Global Warming." UCSUSA.org. Union of Concerned Scientists. Web. 10 Dec 2013.
Erin, Ailworth. "Ex-leader of Japan warns against nuclear power." Boston Globe 10 OCT 2013, Business. Web. 16 Dec. 2013.
United States. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Backgrounder: Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Washington D.C.: USNRC Office of Public Affairs, 2013. Print.
United States. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Backgrounder: Three Mile Island Accident. Washington D.C.: USNRC Office of Public Affairs, 2013. Print.
Lovley, Erika. "Chu vows to push nuclear power." Politico 01 JAN 2009, 2010 Congress. Web. 16 Dec. 2013.
Smil, V. (2010).Myths in the Headlines: Nuclear Power, Energy: Myths and Realities: Bringing Science to the Energy Policy Debate (pp. 150-157). Washington, D.C.: Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute.
Chernobyl was the greatest nuclear disaster of the 20th century. On April 26th, 1986, one of four nuclear reactors located in the Soviet Union melted down and contaminated a vast area of Eastern Europe. The meltdown, a result of human error, lapsed safety precautions, and lack of a containment vessel, was barely contained by dropping sand and releasing huge amounts of deadly radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere. The resulting contamination killed or injured hundreds of thousands of people and devastated the environment. The affects of this accident are still being felt today and will be felt for generations to come.
This paper is about the health hazards of nuclear material as depicted by the Fukishima nuclear power plant meltdown and the role of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in safeguarding the American public against nuclear disaster or exposure to nuclear material and the agency’s commitment to the nonproliferation of nuclear material through their association with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
This has been the worst nuclear disaster the whole world has ever witnessed. The explosion at Chernobyl and its harmful effects on public health and to nature could have been avoided, but instead were made possible because of a political system that cultivated secrets and that did not judge useful to prioritize the development of enforceable safety methods to adapt to the operation of nuclear reactors. The long-term effects to humans affected by the radiation of the disaster have not been able to determine with exactitude, not even after more than twenty years. There are many more negative consequences expected to those people affected and people living in those areas where radiation still is present.
(Action): If we don’t do our part to stop the expansion of nuclear power plants, the future of our planet will be bleaker. Every year, thousands of more pounds of nuclear waste will be buried underground and the damage to our environment increases. There are more efficient energy sources other than nuclear power and we must do our part today to prevent a catastrophic future for our children. The dangers that nuclear power plants pose for the United States are very real. There are many alternative renewable sources of energy available to us such as wind and solar power, which provide a much safer and efficient alternative to nuclear power. You alone have the power to speak up and act against the expansion of this dangerous energy. The future of our environment’s safety and our nation’s energy supply lies in your hands.
The production of nuclear energy is not as safe and clean as some say that it is. The Oxford Research Group released a report providing evidence that supports this point. It is clear that nuclear power plants do not produce a lot of carbon dioxide when they operate, but it is the mining of uranium and the storing of waste that produces the carbon dioxide pollution. This way of producing power is not as friendly to the environment as once thought. The report states that over time more carbon dioxide will be produced because more equipment and energy will be needed to extract uranium ore and store the waste. It is estimated by 2070 uranium nuclear power would produce as much carbon dioxide as a gas fired power station. If the use of nuclear power continues to increase this number would increase as well having a significant impact on global warming and the environment (Herbst).
Nuclear power is the generation of electricity from an atomic reaction. (World Statistics: Nuclear Energy Around the World n.d.) Though it produces zero carbon emissions there has been a decline in support for nuclear power and increased its support for alternative energies in the pursuit for a fossil free energy sector. Factors that have resulted in the reduction of support for nuclear energy include nuclear accidents and waste and the positives of renewable energy which include clean energy, sustainable and reduced health and environmental risks.
Hancocks, Paula. "Fukushima's Nuclear Power Mess: Five Big Questions." CNN. Cable News Network, 07 Nov. 2013. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Most people have bad feelings towards nuclear power because of three major incidents, Three-mile Island in 1979, Chernobyl in 1986, and more recently Fukushima in 2011. It is because of these events that many dislike the idea of nuclear power and have a misunderstanding of what actually happened in these events. According to the World Nuclear Association, “These three significant accidents occurred during more than 16,000 reactor-years of civil operation. Of all the accidents and incidents, only the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents resulted in radiation doses to the public greater than those resulting from the exposure to natural sources. The Fukushima accident resulted in some radiation exposure of workers at the plant, but not such as to threaten their health, unlike Chernobyl. Other incidents (and one 'accident ') have been completely confined to the plant.” (WNA). Each plant had its problems, but the only plant to actually cause damage and the loss of human life was the ukraine reactor in Chernobyl. According to WNA, what happened during the meltdown was that the staff running the reactor did not follow the correct procedure and when they were supposed to follow through with one action they neglected to stop something from happening, therefore resulting in the meltdown of only one reactor out of four. The total meltdown could have been easily prevented if the engineers running the plant had followed through with all plant procedures. The meltdown was an unfortunate accident and many nations turned from nuclear power soon afterwards until more recently when the technology to handle all possible situations with the most extreme care. The United states is best known for its procedures with rectors. The US has set in plans to handle any and all actions for the possible event of a nuclear situation. According to the Nuclear Safeguards Infrastructure Development and
Nuclear energy, while seemingly very efficient, is a dangerous threat to earth. Nuclear power plants are at constant risk for accidents, the outcomes being colossal. If an accident were to occur, exposing
Nuclear energy is not as beneficial to the environment as one may think. Nuclear energy does not burn anything in order to create energy. However, the problem is not in that aspect, but rather the fact that we do not have a way to get rid of the nuclear waste. According to Amanda Beckrich, there is currently no full proof solution to the long-term storage of the radioactive products used in the development of nuclear energy. Materials used in the nuclear process include isotopes of uranium, plutonium, iodine and strontium (Beckrich 10). All of these materials are radioactive and dangerous if exposed to society. When radioactive products are spilled or exposed into society, the consequences can be detrimental. People who are exposed to high doses of radiation will most likely face serious consequences. The United States Environmental Protection Agency states that people will likely face a number of different health problems varying on the amount they have been exposed to. Some possible major health effects include cancer, internal bleeding, damage to the central nervous system and death (“Radiation Protection: Health Effects”). With these outcomes being possible, there is not a justifiable answer to this problem.
Public’s views on future nuclear power development. 1. What is the difference between a. NIMBY movement NIMBY is a word made up of the first letters of the phrase "Not In My Back Yard". It refers to a movement being held by the public to show their opposition to new developments or hazardous technologies that may invade their private property. Those proponents are sometimes called Nimbies.
On April 26, 1986 a nuclear explosion at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in present day Ukraine caused catastrophic damage. A systems test at a reactor took a turn for the worst when there was a sudden surge of power. Unskilled worker attempted a shutdown but only caused an even greater spike in the power surge. A reactor vessel ruptured and a succession of explosions followed. A total of thirty operators and firemen were killed in a short amount of time. (“What is Chernobyl”) The amount of radioactivity released was two hundred times greater than that of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Following the accident into present- day there is a larger number of radiation related deaths as people are exposed to unhealthy amounts of radiation.
"Nuclear Power Plant." Union of Concerned Scientists. UCS, 01 10 2013. Web. 12 Feb 2014. .
The greatest disadvantages of nuclear energy are the risks posed to mankind and the environment by radioactive materials. ‘On average a nuclear plant annually generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel cla...