Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The ethics of animal rights
Harmful side effects of animal testing
Advantages and disadvantages of animal experiments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The ethics of animal rights
Imagine being a rabbit; a vertebrate and warm blooded species. Hopping around an open field and eating all greens. All of sudden, you were captured by an unknown human. You start to rattle around your cage figuring out how to escape. About “twenty-five million and 30 million” animals are exploited in experiments; “half are only used through education” (Donna 7).
“A 40% is applied in basic research, the 26% for drug development, a 20% are examined for products, and the 14% that is left is applied on education and miscellaneous” (Donna 5).
The inhumane cruelty affects the innocent creatures. Animals should only be used for education, and research purposes. Therefore, regulations must increase on animal protection.
Increasing policies will expand the protection of nature. In the Health and Human Resources states the FD&C Act does not specify in exploiting living things. For that reason, companies rely on animals without law stopping their actions. Depending on organisms determines whether it would affect the human health or environment. “Before distributing the product or whatever the item is, advises companies to analyze the merchandise” (Health and Human Resources 1). It does not strictly say to use animals as experiments but, the corporations apply artifacts on living things. Hence, of not stating the use of animals the Health and Human Resources ought to specifically form not to depend on animals.
Further more; “the first amendment was processed on the twenty-fourth of December year 1970” (Donna 20). The amendment did not protect all species. It excluded farm animals, birds, rodents, and cold blooded living organisms. The only creatures that were protected by this amendment were warm blooded only. Indeed only guinea pigs, c...
... middle of paper ...
...wrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Web. 28 Feb. 2011. .
Rosenblum, Joe, and David Kohn. Defy the Darkness: a Tale of Courage in the Shadow of Mengele. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001. Print.
Sullivan, James. "Are Biofuels Ready for Prime Time?" FindingDulcinea | Online Guides | Internet Library | Web Resources. 13 Sept. 2010. Web. 14 Mar. 2011. .
U.s Department Health and HumanResources. "Animal Testing." FD&C Act. U S Food and Drug Administration Home Page. 16 Nov. 2010. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. .
Yarri, Donna. The Ethics of Animal Experimentation a Critical Analysis and Constructive Christian Proposal. New York: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.
Animals have long sense been a part of human life. The dog for example is thought to have been the first animal to be domesticated by humans, sometime around 13,000–10,000 B.C., from wolves. It is not known for sure how humans gained the trust of the Canines but in any event they did, and soon found dogs to be reliable companions. Animals have aided us any many ways, from offering protection and companionship. They should be respected and loved for loyalty; however it has been a very common practice
Animal Testing Paper Evidence of animal testing can be found in greek writing as early as 500 B.C. Clearly showing that animal testing has been around for a long time, but only recently has it become a topic of real concern. Used for the purpose of developing medical treatments that could one day benefit humankind, determine the toxicity of medications (usually in at least two animal species), and to check the safety of products that are destined for human use. http://animal-testing.procon.org/ Animal
Nowadays, there are countless conflictions and controversies regarding medical research, from among those highly discussed issues is animal experimentation or animal testing. Animal experimentation is a method used to experiment newly introduced drugs, cosmetics or even new food spices, such things are tested on animals to ensure that it is safe enough to be used by humans or for humans , but as noble the purpose might seem ,is it really worth torturing such helpless creatures for the sake of making
Should We Still Use Animals in Medical Research? Nowadays everyone knows that all mankind is not vegetarian which means the large majority of people eat meat from animals. We know that millions of animals are killed every day to serve our meal. However, there has been something crucial that is still unknown to or ignored. By many of us or Do you know animals have also been ruthlessly used for a long time in medical research? If not, now you do. Medical researchers are testing cures for human diseases
When one thinks about animal testing, they usually would think about how much medical breakthroughs animal testing has delivered to society. Other people, however, have different thoughts, and may oppose it, as they believe animal testing is unethical. Animal testing has introduced many medical breakthroughs; rare diseases such as polio, mumps, rubella, and hepatitis would be much more common in modern society if it were not for animal testing (Cook). However, many technological advances are starting
The Controversy of Testing on Animals Facilities that use animals for teaching, experimentations, surgery or testing purposes are known as research facilities. Currently, there are twelve animal research facilities in the state of Alabama ("General Information on Animal Research"). There are many different reasons why animals are used for research. Animals are used to test the products used in cosmetics, for biomedical research, for military defense and food production. Many people including
Animals do have feelings, thoughts, goals, needs, and desires just as we humans do. Humans need to respect these similarities, not disregard them. Animals are used in laboratories all over the world in order to cure diseases for humans. Many people feel as though this is necessary, although it is not. With an uprise in disease animal testing has been booming. If animal testing is a necessary evil, it must be performed correctly. Too many times is has not. Failed experiments can lead to the death
technology has propelled them to life-saving discoveries, allowing research and testing without actual test subjects. These cures come in the form of medications and treatments that can take years if not decades of development simply to get them ready to be tested. While some of this research is done without any test subjects, many researchers still employ a method that has been used for centuries: testing on animals. The ethics of this method has been the subject of controversy for almost as long
During years, animals have been scientifically used to experiment with the purpose of testing medicines, to develop new cures and to support the scientific advancements. Animal testing is needed to preserve human life. Is why experimentation for medical purposes should be carried out, instead of scientists performing dangerous test in humans. Animal testing has been used since early times. The first writings about dissection on animals are from as early as 500 BC and Physician-scientists such as
have been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an M&M has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades. Animal testing has been done since at least 500 BC; even Aristotle experimented on animals for scientific reasoning. Around 200 AD, dissecting animals in public was actually
In the article, “Animal Testing and Its Gifts to Humans,” Frankie Trull claims through pathos that the use of animal research is a necessity for the creation of new treatments. Trull opens by saying that animal research has provided another new treatment that is saving lives. He highlights that there is a new treatment in result of animal testing and opens his argument in contest of this treatment to establish a form of pathos. Through medical research animal models are indispensable and play a
2014 Controversy of Animal Research For decades, using animals in research to examine the safety of products has been a controversial problem. Some people say that testing on animals has brought benefits to human welfare in many ways. Others disagree, believing testing on animals is cruel and inhumane. Both sides have their own opinions, and neither of them is wrong. By doing research on the Internet and in books, I have decided to support testing on animals. Animal testing is more efficient to
heated debate of whether animals should be used in research to assess the safety of products and medicines in health care. People feel differently about animals. Some love being in the company of dogs, cats, guinea pigs, etc. Others like researchers and scientists like to look at them as a means for conducting experimental research. No matter how different people look at animals, the bottom line remains that animals are used by researchers and cosmetics companies. The use of animals in research is advantageous
Imagine killing a multitude animals a day by using products people use today. Today, millions of animals are put at risk by scientist who do research on them. Ryan Ballinger from Indiana State University was in a research lab and experience this traumatizing event, “Many products such as cosmetics, chemicals and even bath products are tested on animals. Sometimes it gets in their eyes and can harm them enough to make them lose hair or even their lives” (Ballinger 1). Cosmetics, research, and medical
Pros and Cons of Animal Testing Approximately 60 million animals are used each year in the laboratories of the United States. Whether or not animal testing is cruel or acceptable is an issue many argue over today. Although most acknowledge the negative effects of animals in laboratories, there are many pros in the scientific research. According to the California Biomedical Research Association, almost every medical advancement in the last 100 years is a direct result of animal testing and research.