Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
intriguing issue about animal testing
alternative methods for animal testing
animal testing reasearch essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: intriguing issue about animal testing
Animals have long sense been a part of human life. The dog for example is thought to have been the first animal to be domesticated by humans, sometime around 13,000–10,000 B.C., from wolves. It is not known for sure how humans gained the trust of the Canines but in any event they did, and soon found dogs to be reliable companions. Animals have aided us any many ways, from offering protection and companionship. They should be respected and loved for loyalty; however it has been a very common practice to test household items, cosmetics and pharmaceutical products on animals for a very long time. Countless of innocent creatures are killed, or live a maimed life thanks to the endeavors of human scientist who use them to further there research. Millions of animals are experimented on and killed in laboratories in the U.S. every year. In order to preserve the life of valuable animal testing should be restricted, there are alternate methods that scientist can use to discover their answers.
The history of animal testing can be traced back to the ancient Greeks and Romans. Aelius Galenu...
Testing animals is used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medicinal drugs, check the safety of products intended for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare roles. The earliest recordings of animal studies date back to Aristotle, who discovered the anatomical differences among animals by analyzing them (Introduction). Advocates of animal testing say that it has enabled the growth of numerous medical advancements, tests to see if new products are save for mankind, acquisition of new scientific knowledge, and because it is accurate (B). Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to try out on animals, many animals die from the animal testing, it’s unethical, animals don’t have a say in it, the accuracy is in question because they are testing animals and not humans, and the toll of animal testing is high (B). Through the pros and cons of everything, it is bad to test animals because animals are very different from human beings and thus make poor test subjects and are unreliable, the cost and upkeep of it is expensive, and because there are alternatives to animal testi...
Sun, Shany. "The Truth Behind Animal Testing." Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 83-85. Academic Search Complete. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
Animal testing has been in practice since the early 300’s BCE, often used by ancient philosophers to advance the very little knowledge at the time in the field of biomedicine. Some of these philosophers who began animal testing are well known, such as Aristotle and Erasistratus. Another scientist named Ibn Zuhr came up with the idea of using animals to test surgical procedures on animals before beginning them on human patients (Hajar). Rachel Hajar, M.D., states that animal testing began to undergo criticism from animal welfare and protection groups because of the inhumane procedures inflicted on the animals. These groups had laws passed in many countries that gave the animals more protection when being researched upon. Scientists who support animal testing insist that it is necessary to expand our knowledge in the science and medicine world. Claude Bernard, a physiologist, says “Experiments on animals are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man. The effects of these substances are the same on man as on animals, save for differences in degree” (“Animal Testing and Medicine”). Because of the large amount of debate ...
The types of experiments performed at the University of Buffalo and the University of California depicts just some of the few horrors of animal testing. According to the article, during these experimentations the eyes of monkeys were implanted with metal coils into their eye sockets in order to study movement ("Update: Animal Testing"). Often times animals are tested upon in laboratories, living in cold isolated environments. The moral aspect of the debate, is whether or not animals should be utilized and later euthanized for the purpose of human benefit, especially when only one party decides. As a resu...
"Does animal testing work? - By Arthur Allen -." Slate Magazine. Web. 14 Dec. 2009. .
Animal testing, also known as Animal Experimentation, is using non-human primates to test human products on. The discipline of science impacted is biology. Majority of Animal Testing is done in Universities, medical schools, and pharmaceutical companies. The controversy of Animal Testing is deciding whether to continue or ban it. Both would affect the world, or society as whole, since animal testing does decide what is the right doses, vaccinations/medicines, what will affect the human body and what will not.
In early 500 B.C., scientists such as Herophilus, Aristotle, and Erasistratus first utilized animal testing and began researching organs and systems of the human body. These scientists kept scripts of their vivisections, or the dissection of live organisms. These scripts tell the stories of detailed procedures of convicted felons in Rome. After a while, scientists of that era eventually changed to experimenting on animals after Roman law implemented prohibitions to the mutilation of the human body (Animal Testing). In the past, humans believed that animals did not think, conjure feelings, or suffer from the same type of pain as humans. Aristotle did not believe animals endured a thought process or intelligence and that animal justice, therefore, did not apply to them.
Evidence of animal testing can be found in greek writing as early as 500 B.C. Clearly showing that animal testing has been around for a long time, but only recently has it become a topic of real concern. Used for the purpose of developing medical treatments that could one day benefit humankind, determine the toxicity of medications (usually in at least two animal species), and to check the safety of products that are destined for human use. http://animal-testing.procon.org/ Animal testing has sprouted debate among the human population. Proponents of animal testing argue that animal testing is necessary to achieve medical breakthroughs, without animal testing who would they use for experiments, and that animal testing is important for learning. Arguments for those against animal testing include the fact that animals are biologically different than humans, they are caged in inhumane living conditions, must undergo painful experiments, and it is extremely costly.
Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific and medical research purposes. Animal Research is very customary nowadays, and it became a common and an accepted means of testing by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The views of the public diverge greatly whether animal experimentation leads to medical breakthroughs or such progress is achievable by other means. The views depend on one’s own ethical and moral values and standards. Although many people believe that animal experimentation should be carried out and is justified due to several reasons, animal experimentation should be abolished because it is a very cruel and dishonest method of testing, it is unnecessary, unreliable, and may lead to the experimenters becoming inhumane.
Animal testing is one the most controversial issue today. It is a complex issue that affects scientists, students, industries, public opinion, and the media. Some people say that the benefit to humans does not justify the harm caused to animals because other methods can be used. On the other hand, others say that they agree with these practices because they are necessary for medical knowledge. In my opinion, I agree, and consider necessary the realization of these practices because they allow the development of medical and biological knowledge. Today this practice is discussed in three fundamental fields: teaching, industry and research.
Diana: Good afternoon Melanie. Thank you for coming to my house. I wanted to meet with you because I know you are a very well-known scientist and you work on animal testing. I am not very sure this is something moral to work on and I have always wanted to listen the point of view of a specialized scientist. I personally believe animal testing should not be allowed.
Decades have passed by with the heated debate of whether animals should be used in research to assess the safety of products and medicines in health care. People feel differently about animals. Some love being in the company of dogs, cats, guinea pigs, etc. Others like researchers and scientists like to look at them as a means for conducting experimental research. No matter how different people look at animals, the bottom line remains that animals are used by researchers and cosmetics companies. The use of animals in research is advantageous to mankind. But the cruel and inhumane treatment of animals is not worth the benefits when alternative methods for such research could demonstrate equal results. Consequently, animals should not be in research
Animal testing has been a part of our daily experiments in today’s modern lifestyle. Scientists all around the world and across the past centuries have used animals including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, fish, and birds as objects to test on products before manufacturing and producing them for people to use. Such products may include; chemicals, drugs, food as well as cosmetics. In 1876 Britain was the first country to introduce animal testing; and used it in laboratories as a method to prevent any harmful diseases or infections after the use of the products (Christopher 2008). Even though this method is not used by countries all over the world, it is still a factor that has protected and saved many lives. People who are not supporting animal testing believe that the only reason why animal testing should not be present is because it’s very inhuman. Yet there are
Ever wondered what goes into saving people’s lives? There are many factors in saving lives, and because of modern technology, medicine has become a big one. Drugs are analyzed over a series of tests that determine whether it is safe for use or not. Interestingly, not all drugs are tested in the same way, some aren’t even humane. Animals can be hurt when testing for drugs but if we use other alternatives, like organs-in-chips, in vitro, and humans, then we can change animal abuse and help cure diseases.