The society of the ancient Romans has often been considered the bases for our modern society. When one thinks of the Roman society, pictures of grand villa's and of senators wearing Toga's come to mind. Also, Roman society is often associated with great feasts and extravagance among the rich. There is more to Rome, however, then these symbols and the Classical Roman society is one with a complicated history that covers the history of the ancient city and involves the family, the home, education and much more. The social structure of ancient Rome was based on heredity, property, wealth, citizenship and freedom. It was also based around men: women were defined by the social status of their fathers or husbands. Women were expected to look after the houses and very few had any real independence.
The three main social classes in Ancient Rome were the Patricians, Plebeians and the slaves. The Patricians were the wealthy Romans and for wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the day. Many Patricians were powerful leaders in government or the military.
The Plebeians were more of the poor group of Romans and poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, dirty houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a servant or slave. Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time, the chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and who they would marry.
The ancient Romans were notorious for their keeping of slaves and everyone, including the people of the lower classes, had at least one slave.
...c. 4). This is an example of one of the seven unequal relationships in Confucianism. Much of the social structure of classical China was based on Confucian ideals (Doc. 3). In Greece the relationship between a husband and wife also very unequal due to her young age and lack of education. Alone a woman had no political rights and limited legal powers therefore is was necessary for a husband to provide for his wife much like a father would (Doc. 6) A woman would learn house hold management and eventually produce heirs. These two similar systems of social roles was not a benevolent system. It did not take into account the welfare of individuals, particularly woman who had little power to leave in a bad marital situation. However by insuring that people know their place, which kept them in line, classical societies were more prosperous and able to run more smoothly.
There is some general information pertaining to the lives of women in Rome that we have come across through research and historical evidence. The women of Rome held a very important position in society, which was being the bearer of children. Women were often married at young ages, twelve being the legal age to be wed, and were responsible not only for the birth of the children, but also for raising them and teaching them the values of Roman culture. Unlike other societies at the time, Roman women were of great importance in the lives of their children. Educating the children about Roman life was primarily tasked to the women, while the men of society were responsible for other things not pertaining to the raising of the family.
The Roman Empire had a social system that was based on autonomy, heredity, citizenship and property as well as distinguishing men and women by their social status. The women had the lowest position in society which were depended on the status of their husbands and fathers. They lacked independence and ...
Patricians were the richer people in the world at the time and owned a considerably large amounts of lands. Since they had large amounts of land, which allowed them to gain power, they were deemed patricians, They were the ones who governed the city from the Senate. The Senate was the empire’s governing body during the republic and were voted into office annually by a large group of citizens and also the equites, or men who had property. Equites were people lower in ranking under the patricians (Ancient Roman Politics, Crystalinks). All the social and political power was mostly in the hands of ancient families who are: the Cornelii family, the family of the Caesars, and the Aemilii. The Senate’s power and all other things were lost under the emperors, but the patrician families still held public opinion. The Roman’s sons were sent to be great soldiers so after they became Roman citizens, they were enlisted on their first military campaign. On their return from service in the military, the son of a patrician usually always entered into politics, and sometimes the sons of equites did the same. The young man first stood for election as an aedile, also known as a city councilor. The aediles looked after the corn supply and public amusements. They were basically there just to run the fruitless jobs that were needed. Then the next office that could be achieved was that of the quaestor, also known as the secretary of the
When in Ancient Rome, women were granted barely, if any, freedom at all. These women were not viewed as their own person or respected as a part of society or even a human being. They were not even granted their own proper authority to a nice strong household. The conceiving of a child and the expectations of an ideal woman stayed the same throughout most of Ancient Rome’s history, although some did improve after a while. The rights among the Ancient Romans were unequal and very unfair to women in their empire.
The patricians and the plebians were residents of Rome. They were two different races of people (Rose, 1922, P. 1). The patricians were the aristocracy that generally lived in the city while the plebeians were the normal common people that generally lived in the country. Together they had fought together to over throw the last of the kings in ancient Rome. After the kings were thrown out of Rome the patricians took up the majority of the power. The plebeians were still entitled to vote but they could not sit in any of the offices of power or in the senate. Even though Rome was now calling itself a republic the truth is that it was only a republic for the aristocracy. (Morey, 1901 P. 1). Soon after the kings were over thrown it was obvious
Ancient Rome had a lot of family roles in their life as well as Ancient Egypt. Ancient Egypt and Ancient Rome do their family roles in different ways. They also were alike in many types of ways and we even have some things now. When they lived in ancient times it was probably hard for them. Back in the day, they had a lot of stuff that was difficult. A long time ago it was a very sad time in life. We should appreciate how we live today compared to how they lived back in the day.
Most women in ancient Rome were viewed as possessions of the men who they lived with. Basically they were handed from their father to their new husband at the time of their marriage and submitted any property they owned, or dowry they were given, to their husband. There were however two types of marriage in ancient Rome, Manus and sine Manus. Under the first type, Manus, the woman and all of her property and possessions were placed under the control of her husband and he could do with them how he pleased. Under the second type, sine Manus, the woman remained under the control of her oldest male relative, usually her father or brother. This type of marriage gave women a lot more freedom because they could carry out their own cash businesses, own their own property, and accept inheritance money (Gill, 5).
The nature of government and political culture in ancient Roman society was similarly complicated as our our political infrastructure in modern day Western civilization. In addition, it had its own unique characteristics rendering it a mechanism of social ideal; one where the population was provided for, and at the same time ruled by an upper lass in the electorate.
Women were also thought of as child bearers and child rearers. Women were also married young and were expected to give birth to as many children as they could until they died. In Roman society, infertility was grounds for divorce. Women were neglected often; fathers could choose to expose, or leave a female newborn to die if they so wished and mothers had no control over it. However, Roman women were educated and instead of leaving the raising of young boys to the fathers like in Greek society, Roman mothers were expected to teach their children to read and write. Roman women dutifully instilled Roman culture in their children. Roman women were not allowed to vote or participate in politics. However, Roman women were allowed to be out in public at religious festivals, gladiatorial matches and circuses. They gathered on the streets daily to meet friends, go to the temples, and even engaged in public bathing rituals with other women. They were allowed to attend public debates at the forum. Roman women were allowed to dine with their husbands and did have a marginal influence on society. Roman women had more independence than their Greek
Women in Ancient Rome did not have equal legal status as their husbands, fathers, or any other male figures in the society. Women were not allowed to make legal transactions without her husband’s or father’s consent. This showed how men were superior and controlled the money in the family. A woman was permanently attached to her family of birth and her husband’s family, if she got married.
The role of women in ancient Rome is not easily categorized; in some ways they were treated better than women in ancient Greece, but in other matters they were only allowed a very modest degree of rights and privileges. One thing that does seem clear is that as the city-state of Rome evolved from its early days into a more complex society; women were not always limited to secondary roles. In some areas of Roman society, women were allowed more freedoms than in many other ancient civilizations.
Families were the basis of Roman society while the dominant males-paterfamilias, “held absolute authority over his children” (Spielvogel 129) and others in his household . Roman citizens were classified with three names to differentiate them from other families, but women were usually only known by one. “Females shall remain in guardianship even when they have attained their majority”, (Spielvogel 119) upper-class women were never granted true freedom, but they started making breakthroughs and found ways around the “guardianship” of the males in their households.
In the Greece city-state of Athens women were very restricted. A women had very little property right even less than in other city-states. However women were able to make dedications and loans some in fairly large sums too. Also priesthood was a public activity open to all women (ancient Greece Civilization). In Rome women were in charge of the household and called masterfamilias. They were expected to behave modestly, gracefully and with dignity. Women were married in their early teen years. The Roman state gave rewards to women who had successfully given birth. After having three children a women was considered legally independent. In the case of a divorce the women got their dowry back in full and returned to her father’s household unless she was independent before marriage. If unmarried a women could own a business, and could own inherit and dispose of property. However women were not considered equal to men in front of the law (Life in
Roman society was somewhat progressive during the classical period. To be an upper-class Roman meant that you needed to be vigorously involved in politics and frequently discussed Roman affairs with peers. The upper-class also drove Rome’s desire to trade for luxury goods. Women also began to gain power during this time. While the husband and father was still the head of the house, and the oppression of women still occurred, women started to attain influence and even earned the right to own some