Abortion is a controversial issue that is not easily handled in the world today. While some people, usually conservatives (also known as Pro-Life advocates), view abortion as wrong, others tend to feel that abortion should be up to the woman in that situation; these people are usually liberalists (also known as Pro-Choice advocates). While Pro-Life and Pro-Choice are two different views on the same point, several issues separate these two sides: the goals of each agenda, the side effects of accomplishing these goals, and the moral standards supporting each side. Pro-Life supporters have a moral background mostly affected by biblical influences. These supports also rely on science to help back their claims. One of the commandments given by God is “thou shall not kill”. Conservatives believe that life starts at conception, which is backed by science. The moment that the two reproductive cells meet, life begins. So by this definition, when an abortion is performed, doctors are taking the life of a baby human being. Conservatives believe that this action should be punishable by law. Liberalists, on the other hand, want to keep abortion a legal and regulated process. The moral standard of the Pro-Choice agenda is characterized by the legal definition of life, and circumstantial “what if” scenarios. By law, the start of life is effective when the child takes its first breath. Since abortions are usually performed in the 1st and 2nd trimesters, the child has not began living yet, meaning that the life of a human being has not been taken. Also, liberalists tend to use the example of the rape victim being inseminated. In this case, the moral option would be to keep this woman from having to raise a child whose father she wishes was eithe... ... middle of paper ... ...ons? The whole idea of premarital sex being bad is that these girls could get pregnant and ruin their whole lives. With that out of the equation, there is really no fear of having unprotected sex as a teenager. A girl can just go to a clinic, get an abortion and head back home like nothing ever happened. Either way, Pro-Life and Pro-Choice both offer significant downfalls. All in all, abortion is a tough subject to be tackled by today’s standards. With two very different groups representing each side of the spectrum, the oppositions are clear. The most important issues that these two sides disagree on are the moral standards of each group, the goals hoped to be achieved, and the side effects of achieving these goals. Though making a decision on abortion can be tough for Congress, I am hopeful that someday humanity will figure this whole complicated issue out.
Abortion is a very controversial and sensitive topic in today’s society. Two different sides to this argument is pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life proponents believe in the right to life for unborn fetuses saying that abortion should be considered murder regardless of how far along in the pregnancy the woman is. Pro-choice advocates people who believe the woman carrying the fetus should be able to make her own decision on aborting the fetus.
”The pro-life movement seeks to force their moral beliefs on others - grounded in their own religion or personal philosophy. The pro-choice movement doesn 't make claims on the morality of abortion - we leave that as an individual choice for every woman faced with an unwanted pregnancy. If they feel abortion is wrong and they want to give their child up for adoption, or keep it, we will support their decision. Pro-life people say "Abortion is wrong;" we only say
Pro-life rhetoric concludes, that the unborn child is not human, or alive. According to Francis Beckwith, in “Politically Correct Death” “ One begs the question whenever one assumes what one is trying to prove. To cite an example, abortion advocates who argue that abortion is justified because a woman should have the right to "control her own body" are assuming that there is only one body involved in the abortion act that of the woman.” This is the point they are trying to prove. Or, the popular assertion, "No one knows when life begins, so abortion should remain legal." But to argue that no one knows when life begins, and that abortion must remain legal through all nine months of pregnancy, assumes that life does not begin before birth the exact point the abortion advocate is trying to make. Then, there is the well known "back alley" argument that asserts American women will die by the millions if abortion is restricted in any way. But unless you begin with the assumption that the unborn child is not human, this argument is more or less to saying, "Because some people are killed attempting to murder others, the state should make it safe and legal for them to do so."
Pro-choice versus pro-life argues over the issue of what should be the right stance when dealing with the life of an unborn child. From the perspective of a person who is pro-choice, they believe that “individuals have unlimited autonomy with respect to their own reproductive systems, just as long as they don’t violate the independence of others.” Pro-choice also argues that the government should not have the right to decide whether a woman should exterminate her pregnancy or not. From their viewpoint, they believe that what should be legal in the eyes of the government is contraception use, celibacy, abstinence, and abortion for the first two trimesters of pregnancy. On the stance of pro-life, they argue that the government has a right
During the past quarter century, abortion has joined race and war as one of the most debatable subject of controversy in the United States. It discusses human interaction where ethics, emotions and law come together. There are many points of view toward abortion but the only two fine distinctions are "pro-choice" and "pro-life". A pro-choicer would feel that the decision to abort a pregnancy is that of the mothers and the state has no right to interfere. A pro-lifer would hold that from the moment of conception, the embryo or fetus is alive, but others approve of abortion because they believe that a fetus is not human until birth.
Abortion is a very strong issue in our society today and is an on-going issue in most areas of the world. An abortion, for those who don't know the term, is where a pregnant female medically terminates a fetus or has a miscarriage. With the many recent controversies about abortion in the recent years, society has split in two on the subject. There are the Anti-abortionists, the people whom are against the termination of the fetus. And the Pro-abortionists, those who are for the abortion of the fetus. Even though it may seem like a black and white matter, it does certainly have a gray area for both sides. From health issues, laws being implemented, or the different methods of preventing pregnancies, there are many views from the women on this matter.
A variety of pro choice disadvantages mainly contain arguments with abortion. Abortion does in fact mean taking away a life of a child that has, “no say against it” (Head, 2015, para. 20). Yet, “pro choice protestors do not all agree with abortion” (Head, 2015, para. 6). Many individuals look from a baby’s perspective and shame pro choice. Yet, it may save marriages and save lives, while still providing understanding for the parents to sustain their feelings. Considering abortion
In America, one of the most controversial topics today is abortion. The issue sparks heated debates between people who are pro-life and those who are pro-choice. While pro-life main argument is that abortion unjustly takes away the life
Here are several definitions of Pro-Life and Pro-Choice to help to better understand the difference. Starting with “Pro-life are opposed to abortion also, advocating the legal protection of human embryos and fetuses, especially by favoring the outlawing of abortion on the ground that it is the taking of human life” (Company, 2003). Compared to Pro-Life,
This issue of abortion also belongs to larger issues such as religious and ethical. People with the religious background have a set of values based on the Bible and believe that pro-life should be the only stand people take into consideration in order to protect human life and keep the baby alive. The other class is ethical. From this stand people can choose whether or not they believe abortion is the right thing to do and can make their own choice based on their values, regardless of what religion they are. Because abortion is such a widespread issue, it is crucial that we come up with an agreement on what is best and what steps are necessary in getting to that agreement.
One of the most debatable topics even in today’s society is the right to abortion. Some people believe that life starts at conception and that even an unborn child deserves the same legal protections as an adult. Pro-life advocates argue that ending its life is similar to murder (POLS210, n.d.). Mean while, others also known as Pro-Choice believe it begins at birth and that with laws that restrict abortion it gets in the way with the right of a woman to make a decision of what is in her own best interest (U.S. History, n.d.).
Abortion has been a controversial topic in the U.S ever since it became legal in 1973 after the Roe v. Wade case. Abortion is defined as the, “the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy.” Pro-life supporters believe that abortion is unethical and argue that it is the mother’s responsibility to own up to her actions. They also argue that there is always the option of adoption, and that abortion could be very dangerous. I am pro-life and believe that the government doesn’t have the right to decide what a woman can or can’t do with her body.
The issue of abortion has and always will be a debated topic, as it centers around both the topic of morality and science. In “Science Is Giving the Pro-Life Movement a Boost” (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/pro-life-pro-science/549308/), Emma Green discusses how recent advances in science and technology are providing pro-life advocates with supplementary evidence in their fight against abortion. Additionally, Green discusses the pros and cons of utilizing such evidence. Finally, Green explains how doctors, in light of these progressive advances, are now debating whether or not the window for obtaining a legal abortion should be narrowed from 28 weeks to 22 weeks. While the majority of the time, I would support any advocacy group to employ more scientific material in obtaining their goals and support, I believe that pro-life supporters integrating more scientific evidence
One of the most controversial issues in this day and age is the stance people take on abortion. The two main positions that people take are either of pro-choice or pro-life; both sides, although polar opposites, tend to refer to both the issue of morality and logical rationale. The pro-life side of the debate believes that abortion is an utterly immoral practice that should be abolished. On the contrary, abortion should remain a legal procedure because it is a reproductive right; its eradication would not only take away the pregnant person’s autonomy, but would also put more children in financially unstable homes and the adoption system, and would cause an increase in potentially fatal, unsafe abortions.
Those who adamantly oppose abortion are regarded as pro-life and those who are supporters of abortion are considered pro-choice by contemporary standards. Even among those who advocate abortion, there are discrepancies in their views such as up until what point in the pregnancy is abortion morally permissible. In my opinion, abortion is morally permissible at any stage in a woman’s pregnancy. This is ethically acceptable because a woman should have the right to control what goes on within her body. Along with this, fetuses are still far from personhood (having the qualities of a human being); therefore, we cannot liken abortion to any variety of murderous activity.