Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
gun control literature review
mass shootings and mental illness essay
gun control literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: gun control literature review
“It is estimated that there are 310 million non – military guns in America” (O’Brien and Stanton). Many people that own a firearm usually have more than one gun. Also, a majority of gun owners feel that owning a firearm is the best way to protect themselves at home. With the large number of guns said to be in America, there needs to be a way to prevent the number of frequently occurring mass shootings. The solution to this issue is called gun control. Gun control needs to be implied more in our society because gun related crimes are mostly committed by those diagnosed with mental illnesses, there is no contradiction with the second amendment, it has the ability to lower the amount of mass shootings in the United States, and universal background checks help prevent mass shootings. Many shootings sere committed by those diagnosed with a mental illness. “Laws cannot regulate responses to emotions, mental illnesses, or past events that foster the concepts and motivations of a killer” (O’Brien and Stanton). What causes these laws to not regulate certain people is that they have a certain mental illness or emotion. Laws cannot regulate the internal emotional force. Laws can only imply to those who are capable of understanding and complying with them. “Emotionally unsound people who wish to find weapons will find weapons through any means necessary” (O’Brien and Stanton). A person who happens to have a certain mental illness may not realize that what they are doing is wrong. Usually the mentally ill find their weapons through taking them from their family members or from purchases that they have made. People that have a mental illness or are on a medication are just one reason why gun control needs to be implied more. A person that hap... ... middle of paper ... ...egistered guns in the United States will decline and the number of mass shootings will also decline. Works Cited Bash, Dana. "Leading Senate Talks Falling Short of Universal Background Checks." CNN.com. Cable News Network. 9 Apr. 2013. Web. 19 Feb. 2014. Hamilton, Matthew. "Gun Maker Will Limit Sales in Protest of California Law." New York Times. 24 Jan. 2014: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 19 Feb. 2014. O'Brien, Dan and Betty Stanton. "Gun Control: Exploring the Issues." Inside Homeland Security. 2013: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 19 Feb. 2014. “Statement of Senator David Vitter As He Introduces A Bill to Help Protect against the United Nations Interfering with Second Amendment Rights in the United States.” Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People? Detroit: Gale, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
Fields, Gary. "New Washington Gun Rules Shift Constitutional Debate." Wall Street Journal. 17 May. 2010: A. 1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
“Gun Control.” Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints In context. Web. 15 Sep 2013.
Johnson, Fawn. "The Silver Lining in the Gun-Control Defeat." National Journal. (2013): Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Web 31 Oct. 2013
Wilson, H. (2007). Guns, gun control, and elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Sager, Josh. "Refuting Anti-Gun Control Arguments." The Progressive Cynic. N.p., 12 Jan. 2012. Web. 17 Oct. 2013.
Rauch, Jonathan. “The Right Kind of Gun Rights.” National Journal Vol. 40 Issue 11. Academic Search Complete. 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 6 June 2015.
Rosen, Gary. "Yes and No to Gun Control." Commentary 110.2 (2000): 47. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
Tushnet, Mark. "Interpreting the Right to Bear Arms---Gun Regulation and Constitutional Law." The New England Journal of Medicine. 3 Apr. 2008. Web. 15 Oct. 2011.
Banks, James. "Gun Control Debate: The Argument That Every Gun Owner Needs To Start Making." PolicyMic. N.p., 6 Nov. 2013. Web. 8 Jan. 2014. .
Peterson, Eric. "The Consequences of Gun Control." Oklahoma Wesleyan University. The Keating Center, 18 Apr. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
Richman, Sheldon. "The Seen and Unseen in Gun Control." The Freeman 1 Oct 1998: 610-611
Central in the arguments against gun control is its ability to restrict any citizen of the United States the right to own guns which is protected under the constitution. Specifically, due recognition is made to its connection to the 2nd Amendment wherein it seeks to protect the individual liberties of people. This facet also applies to gun ownership regardless of the original objective and intention. “The second amendment from the Bill of Rights grants private citizens the right to bear arms. Thus, people who stand firmly against gun control insist that no legislation, technically, should have the right to take away a citizen’s guns without first repealing the amendment in question” (Groberman 1). A good approach to consider in highlighting this part comes from depriving the citizen of his basic right on the basis of specific presumption that it would be used for violence or crim...
Gun control can be defined as “the use of law to limit people's access to handguns, shotguns, rifles, and other firearms” ("Gun Control"). In other words, the government initiates a set of new regulations that gives the government the right to strip and monitor the firearms owned by the gun owners. The new demand for legislators to acknowledge and reform the gun laws present today because statistics show how guns has contribution to killings in America and the horrific tragedies. Every year in the U.S., an average of 100,000 people are shot, according to GunPolicy. Out of that 100,000 people shot, some of those victims consist of children, bystanders, fathers and mothers. The lethality of guns in 2011 firearms was responsible for 32,163 deaths in America (Alpers). Firearms have been used recklessly and claimed thousands of lives of Americans, increasing the death rate. If gun control was in effect and passed by legislators the deaths in America from firearms would not be so large. What also contributes to these facts is the ability to obtain guns for violent acts of crime which why the government need to suppressed and monitored firearms.
People who have mental health issues are allowed to purchase weapons and live in houses where there are guns readily available and not under a lock and key. Take a look at the recent Fort Hood shooting, where Ivan Lopez had been receiving mental health help after coming back from a four month tour in Iraq, and he shot eleven people, killing one. Lopez then killed himself, proving how unstable he was. Then there is Adam Lanza. He shot twenty children at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. He also shot six adults at the school and murdered his mother before he went to the school. Adam Lanza shot himself as well. James Holmes is another mass shooter that had seen three mental health professionals before he killed twelve people in a movie theatre in Colorado. If these people would not have been allowed to purchase guns or be in homes with guns, these shootings would have not been as likely to occur.
The Crux,. 'If You Believe In "Gun Control," This Is Probably Not For You... '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct.