Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in crime and punishment
Gender differences in crime essay
Effects of youth among crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in crime and punishment
In regards to crime commission, there is one question that is often asked; Is the commission crime an adult phenomenon? The answer may not be so simple. For example, for those people whom are very technical argue that children (juveniles; people under age 18) do not commit crimes, they commit status offenses and delinquencies. However, there are occasions, when serious offenses are committed, when a juvenile is charged with a crime and tried as an adult. For the sake of argument, commission of delinquencies will be equated to the commission of crimes. Steffensmeier and Streifel, quoting Parmelee, Quetelet Sutherland and Cressey, state that “involvement in crime diminishes with age,” therefore, the older someone gets, the less likely there are to commit a crime (1991, pg. 869).
As argued many times, age is a factor in the commission of crime; however, does age and gender affect each other? According to Steffensmeier and Streifel (1991) there have been several arguments in regards to age, gender and crime. For example, some writers believe there is no difference between genders in different age groups, while others argue that there is a difference (Steffensmeier and Streifel, 1991, p. 869). “Bullying is a component of an antisocial, rule-breaking pattern of behavior” and is very “popular” amongst children, however, is it an indicator of adult crime (Sourander, Brunstein Klomek, Kumpulainen, Puustjärvi, Elonheimo, Ristkari, Tamminen, Moilanen, Piha, and Ronning, 2011, p. 1212)? Sourander, et al., also state that “studies have found a strong and consistent relationship between bullying and involvement in violent behaviors” (2011, p. 1212). The results of a study of 5,351 children included frequent bullies (9% of the sample were mal...
... middle of paper ...
... & Dhami, M. K. (2010). Effects of Offenders' Age and Health on Sentencing Decisions. Journal Of Social Psychology, 150(1), 77-97.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). CRIME AND DEVIANCE IN THE LIFE COURSE. Annual Review Of Sociology, 18(1), 63-84.
Semple, J. K., & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles Tried as Adults: The Age of The Juvenile Matters. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 301-308.
Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Kumpulainen, K., Puustjärvi, A., Elonheimo, H., Ristkari, T., Tamminen, T., Moilanen, I., Piha, J., & Ronning, J. (2011). Bullying at age eight and criminality in adulthood: findings from the Finnish Nationwide 1981 Birth Cohort Study. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 46(12), 1211-1219.
Steffensmeier, D., & Streifel, C. (1991). Age, Gender, and Crime Across Three Historical Periods: 1935, 1960, and 1985. Social Forces, 69(3), 209-234.
As Laub and Sampson (2003) analyze crime over the life course, they highlight Terrie Moffitt’s theory and discuss the limitations of her developmental explanation. In Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, she acknowledges two categories of offenders...
Society offers different factors, like peer pressure or poor grades, which steer an individual to commit a crime (Einstadter, Werner and Stuart 2006). Indeed, there is an abundant relation between childhood experience of violence and unruly behavior and their adulthood behavior. This is a product of a social progress, where children become victims or eyewitnesses of certain criminal acts. Through social progress, some traits, which were not learned before, are recognized and slowly displayed, especially among children. For instance, children brought up in violence, either by being victims or eye witnesses of criminal acts, will display such behavior in their adulthood (Woolf, 2006). Therefore, people will commit different crimes depending in the environment in which they were
Although a juvenile has committed an adult crime which is punishable according to state or federal law, and must accept their role in the crime, it is not advantageous that they be sentenced to adult prison. This considers among other factors, safety in relation to mental, physical and emotional differences between a child and adult.
Farrington, David P. "Age and Crime." Crime and Justice 7 (1986): 189. JSTOR. Web. 11
Several studies conducted to determine impacts of transfers of cases from juvenile courts to adult criminal courts for trial and potential sentencing indicate higher recidivism rates among the offenders. This is because of the notion the youth possess on the strictness on the adult courts. They believe trials on these courts end up in harsh punishment for offenders. In a way, adult punishments scare youth away from committing major crimes. However, studies show that short term punishments imposed on young offenders in adult courts propagates the offenders to commit even more crimes that are serious after their sentence terminates. This results from interactions with other crimes bearer behind bars who are convicted for far much worse crimes than they are. In addition the young offenders continued to commit crimes at a higher rate and more often than earlier on (Shari, page 1).
References Glick, B. (1998) No Time to Play: Youthful Offenders in Adult Correctional Systems. American Correctional Association Wilkerson, I (1996) “Death Sentence at Sixteen Rekindles Debate on Justice for Juveniles.” New York Times, November Butts, J.A. and Snyder, H. (1997) “The Youngest Delinquents: Offenders Under the Age of 15,” Juvenile Justice Bulletin (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice) Lefevre, P.S., “Professor Grapples with Execution of Juveniles.” National Catholic Reporter Snyder, A. “Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders” (1997) National Center for Juvenile Justice
Kendall, D.E (2014). Deviance and Crime. Sociology in our times: the essentials (9th ed., pp. ).
According to Donna M. Bishop( 2003) of the University of Chicago criminal justice system “Transfer of juvenile defendants to criminal courts for adult prosecution has traditionally been justified on the grounds that the juvenile court is ill equipped to handle two classes of offenders. In cases of seriously violent crimes, the public has historically demanded heavy penalties that exceed the authority of the juvenile court (Tanenhaus, forthcoming). While commission of a repugnant act neither transforms a young o...
While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such. Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson, the writer argues that juveniles are not adults. Their brains develop at different stages and they learn skills that they need to learn at a certain time.
Crime and criminalization can be ambiguous; crime is only crime until certain authorities deem the actions illegal. However, social inequalities can lead to increased crime rates, notions such as gender, age, race, and class influence crime and provide criminologist with the date to determine who is most likely to commit a crime and where.
Shelden, R.G., Brown, W.B., Miller, K.S., & Fritzler, R.B. (2008). Crime and criminal justice in american society. Long Grove, Illinosis: Waveland Press, INC.
Wilson, James and Herrnstein, Richard. "Crime & Human Nature: The Definitive Study of the Causes of Crime" New York: Free Press, 1998.
In modern society, most often you hear a crime committed by a juvenile referred to as a delinquent act and not a criminal offense. Early on in U.S. history, there was no difference between a “child” breaking the law or an “adult” breaking the law – they were treated exactly the same. Let’s rewind to the 18th century. Traditionally, anyone below the age of 7 was recognized as an “infant” and therefore was thought to be below the age of reasoning. This meant that anyone under age 7 was not capable of criminal intent and exempt from punishment for their acts and from serving any prison time. This was all fine and dandy, except for the fact that meant that anyone over the age of 7 could be held responsible for their actions. However, there was
Wright, J. P., Tibbetts, S. G., & Daigle, L. E. (2008). Criminals in the making: criminality across
The history of juvenile crime over the course of the last hundred or so has ben a change of practicality to formability. Crime has been alive since there has been opportunity and something of value to other and means to get said valuables, notwithstanding age. Parameters have historically been put in place to counteract, penalize those who committed wrongdoing. When the first s...