Against the Federal Marriage Amendment

1719 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast separation of powers and federalism

Against the Federal Marriage Amendment

The word marriage means many things to many different people. To some people marriage is a religious ceremony, and should remain a religious union, without any interaction by the government. For others marriage is a legal contract, which should benefit both parties involved in the marriage. According Wikipedia.com, most people define marriage as “(1) the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as a husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of the traditional relationship.” Not only has the type of contract marriage is become so controversial, but also the idea of who exactly is allowed to be married is an unresolved issue. Due to so many conflicting views on marriage, some people have wanted the government to define the word marriage, while others feel that it is not in the government’s job description to do so. As a result the Federal government did decide to define it with the proposition of the marriage amendment. What the marriage amendment states is that “Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and woman. Neither constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the logical incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.” However despite efforts by the government to solve matters/issues of marriage, more problems in fact come out of this. The marriage amendment should not be in motion because it goes against the very idea of federalism, takes away civil rights, and also takes power away from the courts also.

The Fed...

... middle of paper ...

... gets involved, mass amounts of people for and against same sex marriage will be unhappy with whichever way it is ruled.

Bibliography

Carpenter, Dale. “The Federal Marriage Amendment: Unnecessary, Anti-Federalist, Anti-

Democratic.” Policy Analysis. Cato Institute. June 2006. . [1-11]

"Federal Marriage Amendment." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 11 Dec 2008, 04:17 UTC.

19 Dec 2008 .

Mr. Chief Justice Warren. “Loving ET UX. v. Virginia .” Supreme Court Of The United

States. June 1968.

Paul, Ron. “The Federal Marriage Amendment Is a Very Bad Idea.” Ron Paul Archives, 2004

October: 1. < http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul207.html>.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Obergefell V. Hodges

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by

    Read More

  • Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

    969 Words  | 2 Pages

    In America’s time there have been many great men who have spent their lives creating this great country. Men such as George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson fit these roles. They are deemed America’s “founding fathers” and laid the support for the most powerful country in history. However, one more man deserves his name to be etched into this list. His name was John Marshall, who decided case after case during his role as Chief Justice that has left an everlasting mark on today’s judiciary, and even society itself. Through Cases such as Marbury v. Madison (1803) and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) he established the Judicial Branch as an independent power. One case in particular, named Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), displayed his intuitive ability to maintain a balance of power, suppress rising sectionalism, and unite the states under the Federal Government.

    Read More

  • Miscegenation Case Analysis

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    A unanimous Supreme Court decision overturned the Lovings convictions on June 12, 1967. The Supreme Court ruled that Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute violated the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause. Chief Justice Warren’s opinion stated that the Constitution provide citizens “the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.”

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    Worchester, . "John Marshall’s Decision on Worcester v. Georgia." PBS. Community Television of Southern California, 18 Mar 2010. Web. 15 Jan 2014. .

    Read More

  • Against the Separation of Church and State

    1749 Words  | 4 Pages

    Without a God how do we know what is right from wrong. What is good or bad? The Ten Commandments tell us what is right or wrong and good or bad, but the constitution says the church has to be separate. If there is no God in our government we cannot have our Ten Commandments, how do we know what is right or wrong? The current opinion of courts is that the First Amendment bans religion in our government to protect the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from the government. The first amendment does not say church and state should be separate since our founders understood if church and state were completely separate, our government would fall apart.

    Read More

  • John Marshall's Effect on the American Judicial System

    1672 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hobson, Charles F. The Great Chief Justice, John Marshall And the Rule Of Law. University Press Of Kansas: Wison Garey McWilliams & Lance Banning, 1996.

    Read More

  • Howard Moody Sacred Rite Or Civil Right Summary

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    If the line is clearly drawn in the sand between church and state it will ultimately be for the betterment of many. Members of the clergy will no longer fear the repercussions of performing marriages for the select homosexual couples who wish to be joined in their church of their choosing. Moody states one catholic priest said: “We can bless a dog, we can bless a boat, but we can’t say a prayer over two people who love each other.” (355) The sacrament of marriage will forever be a topic not everyone can agree upon but as history proves change is inevitability a spoke on a wheel that will constantly be moving forward.

    Read More

  • Essay On Des Moines Independent Community Schools

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.

    Read More

  • Overview of Roe v. Wade

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Jane ROE, Et Al., Appellants, v. Henry WADE." LII. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2013.

    Read More

  • Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Read More

  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

    2637 Words  | 6 Pages

    pp. pp. pp Kay, H. H. (2004, Jan). Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Professor of Law.

    Read More

  • The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)

    895 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in the Wake of Romer v. Evans ." New

    Read More

  • Marriage Definition Essay

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marriage to me is between one man and one woman. The act/idea of marriage came from the Bible and was established by God. He is the one who started it. Marriage is an institution that is recognized by the government, not created by it. So, can the government redefine something at its will? I would never infringe on the rights of other people. If another man wants to be with another, not my business. I will say that it is not a marriage to

    Read More

  • Exploring Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    What is the true definition of marriage? Is it about “religious freedoms or obeying the law”, The Merriam Webster dictionary the full definition is “the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law. Also the states of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage” (Merriam Webster). Gay marriage has always been a controversial topic and I wanted to look more into the many reasons people get worked about it. Starting in 2010 the elections had a general opposition to legalize same-sex marriage but then results from polls split, some support while others are in opposition. The years did not change much from

    Read More

  • Transactional Analysis and Gestalt Therapy

    3503 Words  | 8 Pages

    Stewart, I., and Joines V. (1987) TA Today, Nottingham and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Russell.

    Read More

More about Against the Federal Marriage Amendment

Open Document