Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the effects of development aid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the effects of development aid
In order to improve economic growth, most of the developing and less developed countries asked for aid and borrowed a huge amout of money from international organizations e.g. International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank (WB), developed countries, and other donors. However, they still did not elevate their economy. Easterly (2002), a former economist at The World Bank and a professor of economics at New York University claims that aid and lending is not effective to promote economic growth in developing countries. He also provides reasons and uses several country examples. His exposition end up with a conclusion that adjustment lending and foreign aid gives only little contribution to developing countries economy due to lack of incentives for both donors and recipients. The aim of this paper to complement and criticise Easterly’s argument that adjustment lending fails to boost developing countries economy.
In the first part of this essay will shortly summarize Easterly’s idea; while the second part will discuss its’ strengths and weaknesses. Several compliment notions to endorse Easterly’s argument are provided in this review.
Easterly (2002) noted that there were some success story for adjustment lending in some countries. However, he identified more countries were not successful. These failures are due to two main reasons. First, it was because there were no policy adjustmens from the recipient countries to decrease inflation. Second, it was because the government could not control inflation during transition period. Furthermore, the other polices which he revealed are high black market premium, budget deficit policies, and negative real interest. Easterly also recognise donors’ characteristics which triggered recipient co...
... middle of paper ...
...id contest are not comprehensive enough and also not consistent with his pessismist view on aid. Hence, his chapter is still valuable and relevant with current situation where there are still many developing countries are highly depend on foreign aid.
Works Cited
Booth, P 2012, ‘Does foreign aid make the poor poorer?’, Economic Affairs, Wiley Online Library, Vol. 32, no. 1, p.1,
.
Easterly, W 2002. ‘The loans that were, the growth that wasn’t’ ,The elusive quest for growth: economists adventures and misadventures in the tropics,’ The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.101-120
Moyo, D 2009, ‘Why foreign aid is hurting Africa’, The Wall Street Journal, viewed 07 February 2012,
.
The Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) are economic policies imposed on countries that borrow loans from the World Bank (referred to as “the Bank”) and the International Monetary Fund (referred to as “the Fund” or IMF). Originating from the right-wing neo-liberalism ideology of the Bank and the Fund (which are the International Financial Institutions or “IFIs”), the SAPs were created to establish a free market economic system in the borrowing (developing) countries, which lead to privatization within those countries. The Bank and the Fund tell the critics that the SAPs help ensure that the money lent will be spent in accordance with the overall goals of the loan and help in re...
Singer argues and concludes in his weaker argument that those more fortunate have a duty to donate significant amounts of money to foreign aid agencies. If Singer’s conclusion is to be rejected, it seems one must provide a satisfactory argument for denying the second premise, for the following reasons. Firstly, premise one is beyond challenge, as from an intuitive level, denial would be morally callous at best. The third premise would only be refutable insofar as the efficacy of aid itself is refutable, however the scope of this essay will not examine this considering the relative security one has in trusting aid’s efficacy on an increasing basis. The second premise of the argument is by far the most ambitious and controversial, and therefore in need of enquiry. *Refine and exclude third premise as beyond scope
... aid across the world. As we have established that we do have an obligation to redistribute globally in a cosmopolitan perspective, distributing wealth however we may need to rethink what the best assistance is. Amaryta Sen conveys that before sending aid to the third world state, we would need to fully understand the limitation of freedom in the country. Redistributing wealth to global countries requires it to be evaluated by the economic shortage that they are suffering and to see whether it will be efficient in the long run. The more effective ways to contribute would be to international relief agencies or NGO’s that would pursue international development projects to help those in poverty or the alternative option by Tom Campbell’s idea of a ‘Global humanitarian levy’ which suggests a more appropriate taxation on all citizens to collectively aid those in need.
Jamieson, D. (2005). Duties to the Distant: Aid, Assistance, and Intervention in the Developing World. Journal Of Ethics, 9(1/2), 151-170. doi:10.1007/s10892-004-3324-9
* Speth, James Gustave. “The Plight of the Poor: The Unites States Must Increase Development Aid.” Foreign Affairs v. 78 no3. May/June. 1999: 1-3.
The way in which foreign aid is distributed is highly ineffective and fails to achieve its sole purpose. Corruption ravages the developing world; greedy diplomats and fraudulent officials are often known to embezzle vast amounts of the aid money given to help those most in need. As Lord P. T. Bauer of London School for Economics famously said, foreign aid is “an excellent method for transferring money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.” The money does not reach those who need it but is instead pocketed by dishonest members of government in foreign countries. Over the past years more than half a billion pounds have been invested in Africa yet there is little visual improvement in extreme poverty, deprivation and the child mortality rate. Evidently, Britain’s aid scheme is uselessly trying to combat poverty against a brick wall of bureaucracy. Without doubt this money would be better invested within the UK improving health and education and lowering the deficit.
The policies dictated by the IMF during the 80s and 90s, which were influential in destroying the economies of many developing countries, offer one example of the technocratic approach going awry. Today the realities of the developing world vary from country to country, but experts continue to be obsessed with setting goals and expecting that governments will reach them, without taking into account the likely impact on the local
United Nations, ‘Monterrey Consensus of the International Conferenceon Financing for Development’ (United Nations Department of Public Information 2003) 7
Poverty has conquered nations around the world, striking the populations down through disease and starvation. Small children with sunken eyes are displayed on national television to remind those sitting in warm, luxiourious houses that living conditions are less than tolerable around the world. Though it is easy to empathize for the poor, it is sometimes harder to reach into our pocketbooks and support them. No one desires people to suffer, but do wealthy nations have a moral obligation to aid poor nations who are unable to help themselves? Garrett Hardin in, "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor," uses a lifeboat analogy to expose the global negative consequences that could accompany the support of poor nations. Hardin stresses problems including population increase and environmental overuse as downfalls that are necessary to consider for the survival of wealthy nations. In contrast, Peter Singer's piece, "Rich and Poor," remarks on the large differences between living conditions of those in absolute poverty with the wealthy, concluding that the rich nations possess a moral obligation to the poor that surpasses the risks involved. Theodore Sumberg's book, "Foreign Aid As Moral Obligation," documents religious and political views that encourage foreign aid. Kevin M. Morrison and David Weiner, a research analyst and senior fellow respectively at the Overseas Development Council, note the positive impact of foreign aid to America, a wealthy nation. Following the examination of these texts, it seems that not only do we have a moral obligation to the poor, but aiding poor nations is in the best interest of wealthy nations.
The allocation of foreign aid in international society is not predicated by notions of necessity and development, but rather by self interest and power. Foreign aid’s altruistic façade can often serve to mask a vehement power struggle between the super powers of global politics. In such a struggle aid is used as a currency to purchase power and influence. These powerful gains can be broken into three different categories, the first and most tangible of these gains is the economic dominance that foreign aid grants the donor nation, this is then followed by the security and stability that accompanies strategic aid allocation and finally the gain of soft power through the spread of norms, values and ideologies is prevalent in this ostensibly
Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) were neoliberal policies that were supported by the World Bank (WB) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) for implementation in developing countries. The policy consequences are still a controversial issue and the mere mention of Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) can provoke heated debate. The effects of Structural Adjustment Programs are far and wide and the debates about its impacts still stand the test of time. While Structural Adjustment Program(SAPs) was regarded as a success story in some countries by analysts for mainly its regulatory role in public service reform (Jayarayah Cral, Barson William 1995) and that SAP was working ,but improper evaluation distorted its reality (P. Thandika Mkandawire, Charles Chukwuma Soludo 2003). It’s also widely criticized by other critics for its adverse effects on for instance agriculture;
Foreign aid critics, noble laureates Friedman and Bauer (1950) argue that aid strengthened and enlarged central governments and as a result aid did more damage than good, these critics see aid as being used as a political tool that distorts incentives and increases corruption. Brautigam and Knack (2004) concluded and found evidence that suggested that foreign aid has a negative impact on growth. They argue that it helps corrupt dictators and large business corporations to take advantage of the poor, uneducated and helpless population and environment of the developing countries. This is enforced by showing how despite 4 decades of aid there has been an increase in poverty in Congo, Haiti, New Guinea, Ethiopia and Sudan.
Although this factor is not a sufficient condition but certainly a necessary condition for output and employment growth. Oluitan (2011) submits that the availability of credit function positively allows the fruition of this role and is also important for the growth of the economy. Undoubtedly, there are ample evidences to show that countries that have enjoyed or are enjoying economic prosperity have been linked with an efficient mechanism for mobilizing financial resources and allocating same for productive investment. Sanusi (2002) observed that efficient financial intermediation contributes to higher levels of output, employment, and income which invariably enhance the living standards of the population. This is one of the main reasons why the Nigerian financial system has from time to time undergoing several reforms. The reforms are meant to make the financial institutions responsive to an efficient fund mobilization and allocation to meet the fund needs of the economic units, hence accelerate economic growth. A strong and inclusive financial system; and availability of investable funds play vital roles in financing economic projects and activities that would promote economic growth and development. This is because access to credit enhances the productive capacity of firms and enhances their potential to grow, (Olowofeso, Adeleke and Udoji,
“…increasing international trade and financial flows since the Second World War have fostered sustained economic growth over the long term in the world’s high-income states. Some with idle incomes have prospered as well, but low-income economies generally have not made significant gains. The growing world economy has not produced balanced, healthy economic growth in the poorer states. Instead, the cycle of underdevelopment more aptly describes their plight. In the context of weak economies, the negative effects of international trade and foreign investments have been devastating. Issues of trade and currency values preoccupy the economic policies of states with low-income economies even more than those with high incomes because the downturns are far more debilitating.1”
International aid furthers economic laziness among the poor nations, making them stay longer in poverty when they could work ways easily out o...