Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Postive and negative impacts of migration
independence of india- causes and consequences
Postive and negative impacts of migration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Postive and negative impacts of migration
Emigration from South Asia has been a dominant behavioural pattern on the subcontinent for centuries. Emigration has its origins in the Indus valley civilization whose merchants frequented other lands. Prominent movements began after the death of Buddha (563-483 B.C.), when his disciples travelled to Eastern and Central Asia to propagate his teachings. The nineteenth century brought a radical change to the character of India’s diaspora: small scale emigration became a mass movement to provide cheap labour for Britain’s colonies. Conditions of abject poverty in certain sections of India or the prospect of gaining wealth overseas motivated people to sell themselves into servitude. Since India gained her independence in 1947, emigration has continued; it has not been limited to England and the new Commonwealth, but has spread to the United States, Australia and the Middle East.
When India obtained independence in 1947, many Westerners greeted the event with scepticism. The departing British were certain that Indians would be begging them to come back and rule their country within a year. But India is one of the few countries which, having achieved independence, has maintained a relatively stable government. India is a country with diverse cultures: three major racial groups, four prominent religious communities, and many language categories. An important fact about the country’s development is that beginning with Jawaharlal Nehru and continuing under Dr. Manmohan Singh, India has embarked on an ambitious programme of industrialization. As the country has developed industrially and technology, emphasis on education has enabled India to produce highly educated and technically qualified people. However, India cannot employ them, thus m...
... middle of paper ...
...he pressures of the dominant culture; once they leave their homeland to settle in foreign lands, they begin to adopt the beliefs and behaviour of the dominant group. Assimilation of one cultural group into another may be evidenced by changes in language preference, adoption of common attitudes and values.
Works Cited
1. Naipaul, V.S., In a Free State (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) 52.
2. Naipaul, V.S., “One Out of Many” In a Free State (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973) 34.
3. Ibid., 34-35.
4. Ibid., 38.
5. Quoted in Kinsley, David R. The Sword and the Flute: Kali and Querns Dark Visions of the Terrible and the Sublime on Hindu Mythology, (Berkley: UP of California 1975), 155.
6. Naipaul, V.S., The Middle Passage (Picador, 2011), 84.
7. Naipaul, V.S., The Mystic Masseur (Picador, 2001), 10-11
8. Naipaul, V.S., The Middle Passage (Picador, 2011), 87.
What is pictured when someone thinks of India? Perhaps the manufactured goods, or diverse people. The truth is, however, that until India gained its independence in 1947, it was ruled entirely by British government. The British then proceeded to “improve” India, driving it into a deeper hole. Although British Imperialism in India had some positive effects, the overall political, economic, and social impacts were negative.
Imperialism also had an everlasting positive effect on India through its modernization. For instance, British colonizers develope...
The Partition of India led to millions of people displaced and marked as one of the largest mass migration ever over the world. August 15, 1947 was a very significant day for Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and many others. It marked the day of the British partition of India, and India won its freedom from colonial rule, ending nearly 200 years of British rule. This successful attainment of independence from colonial rule defined a narrative of religious nationalism, but also has led to displacement and violence between the two nation states of India and Pakistan. Once a peaceful union of Muslims and Hindus had become separated, whereas Muslims got Pakistan and Hindus got an independent India (Best et al, 2008). “The Other Side of Silence” (Butalia, 2000, pp.264-300) the oral testimony of a Punjabi woman Maya Rani, who was a child living in Pakistan during the Partition. Her testimony was crucial to understand the historiography of the event, because she was a witness of the impact of the Partition, but she was not directly involved in the violence that the emergence and independence of India that has brought.
Pratt’s terminology becomes more complex when introduced alongside the definitions of acculturation and assimilation. Acculturation means adopting cultural traits or social patterns of another group. Assimilation is the merging of cultural traits from previously distinct cultural groups. Delving deeper into the definition of acculturation and assimilation reveals the terms marginal and metropolitan. A marginal culture is one which its people lose importance and are not fully integrated. A metropolitan...
Assimilation means adapting to a society or culture by learning there ways of life. In this case, for the immigrants based in the United States, assimilation is the key to being accepted as an American. In the early 1960s the U.S had formed strategies that limited the amount of immigrants coming into the country; this mostly favored the Europeans from the North. Later, the Immigration and Nationality Act was approved and this allowed more Asians, Africans and Latin Americans into the U.S. this resulted to an increase in influx of both illegal and legal immigrants allowed in the country.
Acculturation and assimilation are treated as complex, multifaceted phenomena. The acceptance of new cultural traits or social associations and retention of traditional cultural traits and social associations are viewe...
According to the article “Assimilation and ethnic identity,” the author explains that there are connections between assimilation and ethnic identity. The author emphasizes that we should distinguish the forms of assimilation and how they can affect assimilation outcomes (C.N, 2014, p.2). For example, he explains the concept of behavioral assimilation. The latter happens when newcomer immigrants absorb the cultural norms of the host society, such as the language, the way of clothing, and so on. Also, the author argues that the child-parents relationship play a key role in the child’s assimilation to a certain culture (C.N, 2014,p.3). The author continues and writes that if child-parent relationship is strong and sane, the child is more likely assimilate to his parents’ culture (C.N, 2014, p.4). For instance, if the child is of Mexican parents, he will indentify himself as simply Mexican or American-Mexican. Nevertheless, if the child has problems with his patents, the child will unconsciously indentify differently from his parents, and more likely assimilate to the host country’s culture. Therefore, assimilate can lead to the person’s detachment from his or her culture of origin and embrace the culture of his or her host
Thousands of years ago, Indian society developed into a complex system based on different classes. This system was known as the Caste System. It separated Indians into different castes based on what class were born into. As thousands of years went by, this system grew larger and became further complex (Wadley 189). This system caused frustration for the Indian citizens because they were receiving inequality. Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement
Assimilation is a gradual process by which a person or group belonging to one culture adopts the practices of another, thereby becoming a member of that culture. Sociologists commonly distinguish between forced and unforced assimilation. In forced assimilation, a person or group is compelled to take on the practices of another culture, such as by adopting that culture's language and religious traditions. In unforced assimilation, a person takes on the practices of another culture but is not forcibly compelled to do so. Sociologists use the concept of assimilation to describe one way a person or group of a particular culture (such as immigrants) might respond to or blend with another culture, or how a minority cultural group might relate to a dominant cultural
Cultural assimilation is one’s intention or nation in dominating another group or society. The pace can either be quick or gradual, depending on the community being referred to and from what history can tell, it often leads to dispute from both members of the group to a degree that it often causes war. Assimilation of the Native Americans and the Europeans during the seventeenth century are described as a cruel and a horrific period. As John M. Murrin states “the discovery of America was an evil. Never can the advantages it brought about (no matter how one considers or depicts them) compensate for the harm it has caused.” Although this may be true, the cantankerous and domineering Europeans depended on the economic, political and societal gains from the Natives. However, Europeans attempt to change the Natives beliefs on social issues such as religion and
Assimilation into a culture can occur as the result of a deliberate choice. Choy speaks of how “Chinatown's younger brains, like everyone else's of whatever race, were being colonized
One of the most important concepts that I have learned from class is Assimilation Theory. This theory is based on the adaptation that a certain ethnic group goes through in order to fit in and survive in the new dominant society. For example, according to the book the United States in known to be a predominantly white cultural society, therefore many ethnic groups from all over who choose to come to the U.S often have to assimilate and adapt to the social and cultural norms. Assimilation theory affects many ethnic groups in sense that it can change the way they behave and live in a society. Whenever another ethnic group immigrates to a place where there is a dominant ethnic group they often have to assimilate to the dominant group’s social, economic, and cultural behaviors and customs to survive. For example in the U.S, there are many minority groups from all over the globe who immigrated to this country and they often have to go through various changes and adaptations to fit into society and gain citizenship in the country. These changes can be a challenge for them because they have to choose between their own cultural values, beliefs, and behaviors and assimilate to the U.S’ cultural values and customs. In the book it states that “their cultural ancestry is English, Scottish, Dutch and German which is the Anglo-Saxon core.” Therefore, the culture that immigrants in the U.S. have to adapt to is the Anglo-Saxon culture/ “American culture.” For most minorities immigrating to the U.S, one of the major factors that affected them is language barrier. In the United States English is the dominant language, many ...
According to Berry (2002), acculturation is a one of the most complicated processes of change on multiple levels including family, individuals, and cultural. He maintains that acculturation can be a stressful and complex situation, for many reasons and therefore, acculturation should not be conceptualized as immigrant’s transition into a new culture.
Teske, Raymond H.C., Jr., and Bardin H. Nelson. Acculturation and Assimilation: A Clarification 1.2 (1974): 351-67. Jstor.org. Jstor.org/journals, Feb. 2013. Web. 15 Nov. 2013.
The term “Diaspora” is used to refer either to singular person or ethnic population forced or induced to leave their traditional ethnic homelands being dispersed throughout other parts of the world, and the ensuing developments in their dispersal and culture. In the beginning, the term was used by the Ancient Greeks to refer to citizens of a grand city who migrated to a conquered land with the purpose of colonization to assimilate the territory into the empire. A large number of Indians migrated to Far East and South East Asia to spread Buddhism during the ancient times. The migration was a history of misery, deprivation and sorrow during the colonial period. In this century the migration was mainly due to the industrialized and