The report focus on the financial statement analysis of Tick-Tock during 2005 to 2007.And at the same time provides the recommendation whether to purchase Tick-Tock for $275,000 or continue looking for another business. This financial statement has been divided into three segments: profitability, liquidity and financial stability .The first part is profitability which focuses on different aspect of return on investment & evaluating operating performance ratios. And the second segment concrete on the liquidity, as this ratio measures a company's ability to pay short-term obligations, the current ratio of 2007 shows that the firm has a good short-term financial strength to meet its current liabilities. The third part illustrates the financial stability of Tick-Tock Company, which indicates the proportion of assets provided by creditors became more during the two years.
Probability
From the analysis of the data provide, we can know that the return on total asset ratio of 2005 is 37.36%, but in 2007 is 26.06%, the ratio has decreased by 11.3%.This means that the company become less profit. The return on ordinary shareholders’ equity ratio also decreased from 32.82% of 2005 to 24.17% of 2007, this ratio measures the return earned on assets provided by owners, and the decreased ratio indicates the company using the shareholder’s equity low efficient. These two ratios indicate that the business is making less profitable return on their borrowed money during 2005 to 2007. From the horizontal analysis which begins with the monetary amount change, we can see that compared to 2006, in 2007 net sales decreased by 2.21%, which leads directly to gross profit dropping by 4.35%.And the ratio also shows that although the profit after tax has increased from 2005 to 2006, and then decreased in 2007. As the dividend payout ratio measures the percentage of profits paid out to ordinary shareholders, a 148% dividend payout ratio in 2007 indicates the business paid more than one time of its profit as dividends and it has not enough big power for growing. So according to these ratios Tick-Tock is making a decreasing and not satisfactory profit during 2005 to 2007.
Liquidity
The current ratio of Tick Tock Pty Ltd from 18.83 in 2005 decrease to 7.41 in 2006 and then decline to 4.81 in 2007. It indicates this company has the ability to meet its short-term debt from its current. Maybe due to this company had many assents on hand, they used the assets to do some investments and other stuff so that reduced the assets and they wanted to make current assents more efficient and make more money.
From 2010 to 2011 there has been a 23.8% increase in gross fixed assets value. The raised funds through long term debts would have been used to enhance assets base of Speedster. This is a very positive sigh of future profitability and capacity of the company. Higher assets should be able to generate more cash inflow...
The first financial ratio of the analysis is the Price to Earnings ratio (“P/E ratio”). The ratio is computed by dividing the price of one share of common stock, by the earnings per share of common stock. This analysis uses diluted earnings per share which assumes the issuance of new stock for all existing stock options. Also, the price of the stock was computed as an average of the fourth quarter high and low stock prices published in the 10K report of each company, because the year end stock prices were not listed for all the companies. Because the P/E ratio measures the relative costliness of different stocks, in relation to their income, it provides a useful place to begin the analysis.
In order to review the historical health of the firm I will calculate different ratios and gross margins and would try to see the trend. I will use Gordon Growth Model to find out the sustainable growth rate for the firm using historical data and then would compare it with its actual growth rate.
This company has a large amount of assets, they total out at about 124,213. They have more assets than actually cash on hand. This company has no short-term debt, the only debt they have is short-term. There is a section called other assets this, has increased by a lot. The fixed assets have increased by a lot in this company.
Looking at the individual ratios seen in exhibit 1 and comparing it to the industry average shown in exhibit 2 gives a sense of where this company stands. Current ratio and quick ratio are really low and have been decreasing. For 1995, the current ratio is 1.15:1, which is less than the industry average of 1.60:1, however to give a better sense of where this stands in the industry, as seen in exhibit 3, it is actually less than the average of the bottom 25% of the industry. The quick ratio is 0.61 is less than the industry is 0.90. Both these ratios serve to point out the lack of cash in this company. The cash flow has been decreasing because, it takes longer to get the money from customers, but the company still needs to pay for its purchases. Also, the company couldn’t go over the $400,000 loan limit, so they were forced to stretch their cash.
After analyzing the financial statement, I was able to determine several interesting aspects: a .52 debt ratio shows appeal to lenders; a current ratio of 6.31 is very impressive. Seeing that inventory is so unstable and subject to many natural extraordinary events, the more important acid test shows Mondavi has a comfortable, but less impressive ratio of 1.54.
In order to make inferences about a company’s financial condition, its operations, and its attractiveness as an investment we have analyzed financial ratios and compare ratios derived from SVU’s financial statements (see chart 1).
The objective of this report is to give an overall view on research and analysis to regards of two companies, Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc and Tesco Plc that I have chosen for. In this report, I will be comparing two companies’ financial analysis based on their comprehensive income and balance sheet for one year; and also will be comparing their generating cash ability, cash management and financial adaptability based on statement of cash flows for the past two year and also determine whether the two companies have the ability to repay their debts to their creditors, generating into cash and going concern which related to finance.
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders’ equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline, as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%).
By taking into account only the most liquid assets, ratio 1.0 in 2013 and 2012, which increased by a small margin 0.2 from 2011, indicates that company has strong liquidity position.
Furthermore, Cocoaland Holdings Berhad has the total revenue of RM50,000,000 in 2015 and RM10,000,000 in 2016. It can be seen that decrease RM40,000,000 compare to this both years. Additionally, this company’s debt consists of 34,685,858 in 2015 and 38,057,668 in 2016. Moreover, it consists of total equity and debt-to-equity ratio inside their capital that is 202,680,654 and 0.17 in 2015 and 2015239,503,310 and 0.16 in 2016. It can conclude that total equity increased and the debt-to-equity ratio was decreased compare to 2015 to
After finish the whole set of tutorials, our perspective of accounting become more professional. The study of accounting is not just for the knowledge and skill, but also for the critical thinking as a professional. Accounting professional is not just about the job that we what to take for our future career, but also the behavior that we need to have for our daily life.
In the past, the company performance was measured by asking ‘how much money the company makes?’ To a certain extent, they are right because gross revenue, profitability, return on capital, etc. are the results that companies must bring to survive. Unfortunately, in today business if the management focuses only on the financial health of the company, numerous unwanted consequences may arise.
ABC LTD COMPREHENSIVE INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 NOTE 2012 Revenue 2 828,500 Cost of sales 3 (460,000) Gross profit 368,500 Other income 4 2,500 Operating expenses 5 361000 Profit before income tax 10000 Income tax expense (30%) 3,000 Profit for the year 7000 Other comprehensive income change in revaulation surplus 38500 Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 38500 Total comprehensive income for the year 45500 ABC LTD STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 NOTES 2012 ASSETS Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 6 100500 Trade and other receivables 7 45,200 Inventories 8 87700 Other current assets 9 7000
than we can assume that the financial position of the company is not sound. This also indicates that there is over trading.