A Socratic Sophists Dialectic

1611 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of rhetoric

Socratic dialectic can be bluntly described as a pursuit to seek for wisdom concluded by an in depth understanding through a group dialogue. Whereas sophistry can be described as a deceiving type of confab, this values debates and argumentation that teach virtue. The aim of a Socratic dialectic is to establish truth from discussion which helps those within a group to establish veracity on a basic or broader subject. Rhetoricians or Sophist teach the purpose of virtue; sophist way of communicating would prefer to argue and debate specific subjects, which only in turns leads to skeptism, and success of a winner. Clearly seen Socratic dialectic is an approach to a conversation that opens up a dialogue which allows participants to speak and gain knowledge from others, thusly leading to a truth that cannot be revealed through sophistry.

Within The Symposium, the Socratic Dialectic starts with the claims of Phaedrus that love “is the most ancient of the gods, and the most honored, and the most powerful in helping men gain virtue and blessedness, whether they are alive or have passed away” (Plato, Symposium 180B)(Plat. Sym.180b). Then Pausanias says that there are at least two kinds of love: sacred and profane, and one can never completely reject both of them (Plato, Symposium 180D-181D)Next, are the views of Eryximachus, he explains that there are two types of Eros (Good, and Bad) he begins by explaining how its’ disturbing human life only, into a general principle bearing on all existence, by which conflicting elements are brought into harmony (Plato, Symposium 186A-B)(186a-b). Aristophanes states originally that there were three types of human beings: male, female, and androgynous. Each human being had two heads and two sets of sex...

... middle of paper ...

...ny, n.d. 186A-B.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 189E-190C, 190E-192E, 193A-B.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 201D-203B.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 198B-199B.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 199C-201C.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 198E-199A.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 196C.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 200A-B.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 221E.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 222D.

Plato. "Symposium ." Plato. Symposium . Hackett Publishing Company, n.d. 216A.

Show More
Related

  • Love in EΡΩΣ by Robert Bridges, and Eros by Anne Stevenson

    530 Words  | 2 Pages

    “EΡΩΣ” by Robert Bridges has a contradictory concept of what humans view as love, thus the negative and positive comparisons are between Eros different angles in love and lust. For instance, Eros is described as both having “exuberant flesh so fair” yet “Ere from his chaste marmoreal,” thus stating he has both a sexual, savage appearance, yet a pure and smooth one also. The speaker also states, “Surely thy body is thy mind, for thy face is nought to find…” where Eros is being described as a pretty boy who beyond his looks has no brain. Both these descriptions, of a sexual appearance and having no brains, depict that ...

    Read More

  • Interpretation of Love in Plato’s Symposium

    1776 Words  | 4 Pages

    The meaning of love is as intricate and unique as the purpose that it serves. It seems that the nature of love is found in the mind, the body and the soul. In Plato’s Symposium each member of the drinking party gives their own interpretation of love. As each speaker engages in their discourse, the concept of love is evaluated from different angles. According to Phaedrus, homoerotic love is the highest form of love and that sacrificing oneself for love will result in a multitude of rewards from the gods, while Pausanias believes that there are two forms of love: Commonly and Heavenly. As a physician, Eryximachus claims that love appears in every part of the universe, including plants and animals and that protection results from love. Before starting his speech, Aristophanes tells the group that his discussion about love may seem completely absurd, as he explains that in the beginning one body had two people who were eventually split in half by Zeus. This is meant to explain why people are constantly looking for their “other half”. Moreover Agathon, the poet the symposium is celebrating, critiques the previous speakers by stating that they failed to praise the god of love. He claims that love rejects feebleness and embraces youthfulness while also implying that love creates justice, courage and wisdom.

    Read More

  • Comparing Candide, Cervantes Don Quixote, And

    667 Words  | 2 Pages

    Love is heavily intertwined with being human. Indeed, everyone doubtlessly experiences some form of love in their life, be it towards objects or people. This love is organized into three types; eros, philos, and agape. Eros, likely the most common kind of love in western culture, denotes sexual desire, or lust. Philos covers love among friends, or love for the purpose to gain something. Agape, the rarest of all, encapsulates selfless love, or the willingness to die for another. All forms are present within the three works, Voltaire’s Candide, Cervantes’ Don Quixote, and in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, albeit in differing levels.

    Read More

  • The Accounts Of Eros In The "symposium"

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    the time of Socrates and Plato. To them love was eros, a direct translation of

    Read More

  • Romeo And Juliet Philia

    1356 Words  | 3 Pages

    Humans have many ambitions in life, yet most people’s ambitions fall into one spectrum. This spectrum? Love. People often express their desire for love, yet don’t realize that love is carried with them throughout their lives. In today’s society, ‘love’ is a commonly used term to describe a relationship based on affection for another person. However, love has many levels of complexities. Ancient greeks recognized the various forms love can take. Some of which include eros, storge, and philia. William Shakespeare, in his classic drama “Romeo and Juliet,” and other authors use eros, storge, and philia to explore the complexities of love and its effects.

    Read More

  • Socratic Method: Wisdom Through Questioning

    1207 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates is as a person who is profoundly wise, a person who has understood planes of reality far higher than what is understood by most people. He is depicted as one who has been outside the cave and who is no longer imprisoned by the illusions of the ordinary world. He is depicted as a skilled communicator who can ask people to question and examine even their most cherished assumptions. The Socratic Method is based on a dialogue between two or more people who may hold differing views, but wish to pursue the truth by seeking agreement with one another, Socrates used it quite differently in that he believed that knowledge was instinctive and could be brought out by means of skillful questioning. In many ways, Socrates resembled the Sophists.

    Read More

  • Two Types of Love in Plato's Symposium

    1223 Words  | 3 Pages

    I have always thought that there was only one type of love, which was that feeling of overwhelming liking to someone else. I am aware that Lust does exist and that it is separate from Love, being that the desire for someone's body rather their mind. In Plato's Symposium, Plato speaks of many different types of love, loves that can be taken as lust as well. He writes about seven different points of view on love coming from the speakers that attend the symposium in honor of Agathon. Although all these men bring up excellent points on their definitions on love, it is a woman that makes the best definition be known. I will concentrate on the difference between the theory of Common and Heavenly love brought up by Pausanias and the important role that Diotima plays in the symposium.

    Read More

  • The Nature of Love Explored in Plato’s Symposium

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    In classical Greek literature the subject of love is commonly a prominent theme. However, throughout these varied texts the subject of Love becomes a multi-faceted being. From this common occurrence in literature we can assume that this subject had a large impact on day-to-day life. One text that explores the many faces of love in everyday life is Plato’s Symposium. In this text we hear a number of views on the subject of love and what the true nature of love is. This essay will focus on a speech by Pausanius. Pausanius’s speech concentrates on the goddess Aphrodite. In particular he looks at her two forms, as a promoter of “Celestial Love” as well as “Common Love.” This idea of “Common Love” can be seen in a real life context in the tragedy “Hippolytus” by Euripides. This brings the philosophical views made by Pausanius into a real-life context.

    Read More

  • Aristophanes Views On Love

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Symposium, a most interesting view on love and soul mates are provided by one of the characters, Aristophanes. In the speech of Aristophanes, he says that there is basically a type of love that connects people. Aristophanes begins his description of love by telling the tale of how love began. He presents the tale of three sexes: male, female, and a combination of both. These three distinct sexes represented one’s soul. These souls split in half, creating a mirror image of each one of them. Aristophanes describes love as the search for the other half of your soul in this quote: “When a man’s natural form was split in two, each half went round looking for its other half. They put their arms around one another, and embraced each other, in their desire to grow together again. Aristophanes theme is the power of Eros and how not to abuse it.

    Read More

  • Forms of Love in Plato's Symposium

    2571 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Plato’s work Symposium, Phaedrus, Pausania, Eryximachus, Aristophane and Agathon, each of them presents a speech to either praise or definite Love. Phaedrus first points out that Love is the primordial god; Pausanias brings the theme of “virtue” into the discussion and categorizes Love into “good” one or “bad” one; Eryximachus introduces the thought of “moderation’ and thinks that Love governs such fields as medicine and music; Aristophanes draws attention to the origin and purposes of Love; Agathon enunciates that the correct way to present an eulogy is first to praise its nature and gifts. As the last speaker, and the most important one, Socrates connects his ideas with Diotima of Mantinea’s story of Love’s origin, nature and purpose. Different from the earlier five speakers who regard Love as an object and praise different sides of it, Socrates, referring to Diotima’s idea, considers Love as a pursuit of beauty gradually from “physical beauty of people in general” (Symposium, Plato, 55) to the “true beauty” (55).

    Read More

  • Love and Beauty in Plato’s Phaedrus and Symposium

    633 Words  | 2 Pages

    Let’s first focus on the Phaedrus, where Plato gives a detailed account of the psychology and the art of love. Socrates first introduces a thought-provoking analogy, comparing the soul to “the natural union of a team of winged horses and their charioteer” (246a6). One of the horses represents modesty and self-control, while the other one is full of excessive appetite. The charioteer (which could be interpreted as human’s rational element as mentioned in the Republic) tries to suppress the bad horse so that he can leads the chariot “toward what is best and in control” (237e3). However, if he is unable to do so and let the bad horse take control, “appetite drags us irrationally towards pleasure and rules in us, its rule is call excess (hubris)” (238a1). If love is controlled purely by the drive toward pleasure, this kind of erotic love is bad, as Lysias rightly belittles in the Symposium. In Socrates' view, however, there is also another kind of love, namely:

    Read More

  • Socrates' View Of Love

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    with some very different views of love as brought to us by Agathon, Phaedrus and

    Read More

  • Socrates: The Use Of The Socratic Method

    1318 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates was known to be a philosopher in ancient Greece, specifically Athens, who laid down the foundations of western philosophy. He was born in 469-470 BC and died by execution in 399 BC for his philosophies. His ideologies are extremely appreciated today for many uses. His philosophies are guidelines on how we should live, but Socrates never once wrote his teachings down. The majority of his work was documented by Plato, who was one of Socrates followers. Many considered Plato as one of his students, but Socrates was documented to have not taught for money or opened his own academy of philosophy which suggests that Plato was not an actual student of his. The main source of information about Socrates and his work is not documented by him

    Read More

  • Socrates and the Sophists

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    How would you feel if someone called you a sophist? Before you answer, it's important to know how the meaning of this word has evolved. "During the fifth century, sophists were teachers, speakers, and philosophers who were paid to use rhetoric (Mardner 1)." But many people opposed their style of teaching. Socrates was a philosopher who disagreed with the Sophist's point-of-view. The main differences between the Sophist and Socrates were their views on absolute truth.

    Read More

  • Socrates' Pursuit of Wisdom

    1155 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philosophy can be defined as the pursuit of wisdom or the love of knowledge. Socrates, as one of the most well-known of the early philosophers, epitomizes the idea of a pursuer of wisdom as he travels about Athens searching for the true meaning of the word. Throughout Plato’s early writings, he and Socrates search for meanings of previously undefined concepts, such as truth, wisdom, and beauty. As Socrates is often used as a mouthpiece for Plato’s ideas about the world, one cannot be sure that they had the same agenda, but it seems as though they would both agree that dialogue was the best way to go about obtaining the definitions they sought. If two people begin on common ground in a conversation, as Socrates often tries to do, they are far more likely to be able to civilly come to a conclusion about a particular topic, or at least further their original concept.

    Read More

More about A Socratic Sophists Dialectic

Open Document