A Democratic Government: Of the People, by the People, for the People

721 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: bias in media examples

The right to vote is one of the key aspects that sets us apart from countries like North Korea where one person’s opinion is law. Even with ability to vote, there are the people that count the votes and the people who announce the outcomes to our society. Without these people, it would be hard to determine who runs our society even after we voted. For example, if CNN reported that John Smith won the election and everybody agreed that he won it, would it even make a difference who did? In that sense, it wouldn’t matter who really won the election, but rather who won the public opinion. Similar to 1984 by George Orwell, the people who control public opinion and the media control everything. For example, in the case of NBA vs. Donald Sterling it doesn’t matter the legality of the situation or the outcomes. The question, as David Davenport (see citation) clearly states, is whether it’s a court of public opinion or of law. In the end, it doesn’t matter. If public opinion locks in a certain idea or ideal, court cases can be overthrown and rules twisted to make it seem as that a circle block can go into a square hole. Combining these two elements, anything can be made reality.
The least important part of government is the party system. The party system is built on the extremes of public opinion, which as described above, can be changed. It doesn’t matter with whom you side as long as they share the same opinions. A recent example of this extremism is both parties disagreeing with each other so much as to not pass a national budget on time causing a national shutdown. The issue is that people are more focused on certain issues than others. For example, my mother is a teacher and calls for community involvement to solve educ...

... middle of paper ...

...ress is put on the “politics” of it all and pushed on to the actual issues at hand. Just like in the case of NBA vs. Donald Sterling, people have to unify that ideas of public opinion and what the law actually is to make the government more efficient. We can’t have somebody needing to force his opinion in order to be heard. By listening to both sides of the story and analyzing situations complexly, we can derive a solution for the issues that are pressuring society. This is democracy, this is government.

Works Cited

Davenport, David. "NBA vs. Donald Sterling: The Court Of Public Opinion Or A Court Of Law?" Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 19 May 2014. Web. 26 May 2014. .
" ." IEEE-SA. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 May 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • Federalist Papers 10 and 51

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are two ways to get rid of the causes of factions, or political parties. The first way of removing these causes is to destroy the liberty essential to their existence. The second way to get rid of the causes is to give everyone the exact same o...

    Read More

  • Political Parties In Texas

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    It appears that political parties can't win per professional commentators and the general public. It is possible that they're in charge of causing divisions in society by being too partisan or they don't stand for anything since they represent too many diverse interests. These contradicting criticisms of parties are not new. Some of the Founders of the United States famously saw political parties as a source of intolerant spirit, which is a view that has continued in contemporary circumstances. At the same time, we frequently criticize parties for lacking any coherent political program. The long list of issue positions delivered by party committees is the outcome supposedly caused by the needs for parties to unite enough interests in order

    Read More

  • Political Parties In The 1790s

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the 1790s, soon after the ratification of the Constitution, political parties were nonexistent in the USA because President Washington feared they would drive the country apart. However, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, with their rivalling mental models, could not help but spark the division of the United States into the Democratic-Republican and Federalist parties. These parties, the Democratic-Republican wanting a small, local government system and the Federalist wanting a strong, powerful government system, turned citizens against one another and eventually led to the inimical Democratic and Republican parties of today. Hence, the formation of the original political parties in the United States is very significant. Political

    Read More

  • The Second Challenge: Imperial Judiciary

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    In William Hudson’s book, American Democracy in Peril, he writes about different “challenges” that play a vital role in shaping the future of the United States. One is the problem of the “imperial judiciary”. Hudson defines its as that the justice system in the United States has become so powerful that it is answering and deciding upon important policy questions, questions that probably should be answered by our democratic legislatures. Instead of having debates in which everyone’s voices are heard and are considered in final decision-making process, a democratic-like process; we have a single judge or a small group of judges making decisions that effect millions of citizens, an “undemocratic” process. Hudson personally believes the current state of judicialized politics is harming policy decisions in Americans. According to him, the judicial branch is the “least democratic branch”, and ...

    Read More

  • The Two-Party System

    1627 Words  | 4 Pages

    system produces conflicts between the Congress and the President and promotes very outdated beliefs that stem from the Constitution. A vast majority of the American population has the stern belief that the Constitution does not need to be changed in any way, shape, or form. This belief, however, is keeping the country from progressing along with other countries around the world. These single parties are holding control of multiple branches of government at once and monopolizing the power during their respective terms. The government “faces an incapacity to govern since each party works as a majority party” and believes there is no reason for innovation (Dulio & Thurber, 2000). The two parties are seemingly always clashing about one thing or the other, making it difficult for things to get accomplished, and proves the thesis correct that the two-party system is ineffective for a growing country.

    Read More

  • Factionalism in America

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    In discussing the problems surrounding the issue of factionalism in American society, James Madison concluded in Federalist #10, "The inference to which we are brought is that the causes of cannot be removed and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects." (Federalist Papers 1999, 75) In many ways, the nature of American politics has revolved around this question since our country's birth. What is the relationship between parties and government? Should the party serve as an intermediary between the populace and government, and how should a government respond to disparate ideas espoused by the factions inherent to a free society. This paper will discuss the political evolution that has revolved around this question, examining different "regimes" and how they attempted to reconcile the relationship between power and the corresponding role of the people. Beginning with the Federalists themselves, we will trace this evolution until we reach the contemporary period, where we find a political climate described as "interest-group liberalism." Eventually this paper will seek to determine which has been the most beneficial, and which is ultimately preferable.

    Read More

  • Dangers of the two party system

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    In closing, Washington had warned the people about the dangers of the political party saying that ‘ It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.’ Its up to the people of America to realize the problem with two party system, and vote outside of the two major parties.

    Read More

  • Party Polarization Examples

    495 Words  | 1 Pages

    From their earliest formation, political parties have been a controversial aspect that have both strengthened and weakened the United States. It has a massive effect on voters, congress, and policymaking in the government. Party polarization is the prominent division that exists between parties, most noticeably Democrats and Republicans, because of the extreme differences of the ideological beliefs of the opposing parties. In the past, many individuals considered themselves “mixed” and did not associate themselves with just one side. According to www.pewresearch.org, “the share of Americans who express consistently conservative or consistently liberal opinions has doubled over the past two decades”. Every year less and less people consider

    Read More

  • The Source of Political Polarization

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    American democracy was built on the foundation of compromises. For example, the Constitution would have never been ratified if the Bills of Rights was not part of the compromise. In a system that is built on making compromises, it is dangerous to have high levels of political polarization. The Republican-controlled House and the Democrat-controlled Senate are constantly at a gridlock and are on the path to becoming the most unproductive Congress since World War II. Despite the “growth” of self-proclaimed Independent, a quick look at their voting history would show that they are usually weak Democrats or weak Republicans. In American politics, party identification is still the single best indicator of how a person will vote. In recent years, both parties have become smaller and more ideologically homogeneous; Republicans are dominated by conservatives, while a growing number of Democrats call themselves liberals. Most Americans claim that they see important differences between the parties and many feel that they must stay loyal to their party especially during presidential elections.

    Read More

  • America's Democracy

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    America's Democracy The United States of America is a republic, or representative democracy. Democracy, a word that comes to us from Greek, literally means the people rule (Romance, July 8). This broad definition leaves unanswered a few important details such as who are the people, how shall they rule, and what should they rule on (July 8). Defining the answers to those questions means defining a model for a democratic system.

    Read More

  • Of the People, By the People, For the People

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    A defining attribute of America’s system of government is the participation of the citizens in decisions. Unlike many countries in the world today, one dictator does not decide the path for the whole nation. People from ordinary backgrounds have the opportunity to have an affect on laws passed in our country. While voting is the more common form of exhibiting this privilege of participation, citizens also have the ability to run for offices in our government. The structure of our government is unique in that there are numerous offices to be held within our government which are relatively equal in power. Officials within the federal government can be categorized as being part of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of government. Understanding the structure and function of these branches is important when considering the uniqueness of our nation, as well as knowing the qualifications one must posses to obtain these offices.

    Read More

  • Democracy: The Five Principles Of American Democracy

    254 Words  | 1 Pages

    These were the five fundamental principles women were not allowed to vote until August 18, 1920 when the 19th amendment guaranteed all American women the right to vote. The voting act of 1965 block barriers from state levels to allow African Americans to exercise their right to vote. Additionally how people could have individual freedom that did not infringe on the rights of other citizens. Equal protection under the law must apply to all people to equal protection. Which is still a

    Read More

  • Democracy as the Best Form of Government

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    The foundation of the modern political system was laid in the times when the world was strangled in slavery. In those moments, enlightened minds in Greek came up with the new system that was there to remain for the next thousands of years. This system, now known as democracy, is a form of government in which supreme power is vested to the people themselves. People have the right to elect their leaders directly or indirectly through a scheme of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. A new democratic government is usually established after every 4-5 years, and it is trusted with the responsibility to cater to the needs of all the people irrespective of the fact that they voted for them or not. Although the minorities may not be very pleased with the idea of democracy, however, a democratic government is certainly the best because it establishes social equality among people, reduces the conflicts in the state to a minimum, gives the chance to vote repeatedly, and creates patriotism.

    Read More

  • Democracy Is The Worst Form Of Government

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    The government ensures that the citizens are living in a peaceful country, with security, better service delivery and it also a good thing allowing people to participate in decision making through voting. The political parties play a role in providing these resources to the people like; clean water, repair roads, remove garbage, etc. When we come to voting between different parties that under the government we vote for how they deliver services to the society. The election time where every party goes to an electoral campaign to present the candidate that they nominated to stand for them in the political office and make promises to the people into how they can change the world and how they can deliver services much better than the party that is already in charge. They normally d...

    Read More

  • the ideal democracy

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    The idea of an ideal democracy is not a particularly obtainable idea, considering the different in culture and history of countries this could be a dramatic change to previous authoritarian regimes. Although we can work towards this idea of an ideal democracy reaching this goal will be a much harder task. The attributes that contribute to having an ideal democracy are free and fair elections, their capability to implement policies, political participation of the masses and universal adult suffrage, and a multiple party political system.

    Read More

More about A Democratic Government: Of the People, by the People, for the People

Open Document