The Case For Reparations By Ta-Neehisi Coates Analysis

1652 Words4 Pages

Ragavi Rajkumar Mr.Banno AP U.S History 8th January 2018. Journal #4 Part 1: In “The Case for Reparations,” Ta-Nehisi Coates sets out a powerful argument for reparations to blacks for having to thrive through horrific inequity, including slavery, Jim Crowism, Northern violence and racist housing policies. By erecting a slave society, America erected the economic foundation for its great experiment in democracy. And Reparations would mean a revolution of the American consciousness, reconciling of our self-image as the great democratizer with the facts of our history. Paying such a moral debt is such a great matter of justice served rightfully to those who were suppressed from the fundamental roles, white supremacy played in American history. The article begins with the author narrating the story of Clyde Ross, whose journey from Mississippi to Chicago is a living example of the trajectory. Ross, the son of a Mississippi sharecropper, saw the small portion of wealth and land his father could attain forcibly stripped from him by …show more content…

Ross previously asked not to question authorities, wouldn’t be quiet.He joined the Contract Buyers League, not just appealing to the government simply for equality and no longer fleeing in hopes of a better deal elsewhere. Instead, they were charging the society with a crime against their community. They wanted the crime publicly ruled as such. And they wanted restitution for the great injury brought upon them by offenders. In 1968, Clyde Ross and the Contract Buyers League were no longer simply seeking the protection of the law. They were seeking reparations.They wanted reparations not just to feed and house themselves. They wanted to prove that the struggle is really all because of the past and compensation would level them up to live through practicing freedom and

Open Document