Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on social entrepreneurship
Social entrepreneurship and its impact
Essays on social entrepreneurship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Social entrepreneurs are individuals with innovative solutions to society’s most pressing social problems. Rather than leaving societal needs to the government or business sectors, social entrepreneurs find what is not working and solve the problem by changing the system, spreading the solution, and persuading entire societies to move in different directions. ust as entrepreneurs change the face of business, social entrepreneurs act as the change agents for society, seizing opportunities others miss to improve systems, invent new approaches, and create solutions to change society for the better. While a business entrepreneur might create entirely new industries, a social entrepreneur develops innovative solutions to social problems and then implements them on a large scale. Social entrepreneurs drive social innovation and transformation in various fields including education, health, environment and enterprise development. They pursue poverty alleviation goals with entrepreneurial zeal, business methods and the courage to innovate and overcome traditional practices. A social entrepreneur, similar to a business entrepreneur, builds strong and sustainable organizations, which are either set up as not-for-profits or companies. A social entrepreneur is a leader or pragmatic visionary who: • Achieves large scale, systemic and sustainable social change through a new invention, a different approach, a more rigorous application of known technologies or strategies, or a combination of these. • Focuses first and foremost on the social and/or ecological value creation and tries to optimize the financial value creation. • Innovates by finding a new product, a new service, or a new approach to a social problem. • Continuously refines and adapt... ... middle of paper ... ...s final report in June 2010. The project was led by Associate Professor Jo Barraket, Australia's leading social enterprise academic. One of the key features of this Australian research is its intention to define social enterprise in a way that was informed by and made sense to those working in or with social enterprises. The research design therefore included workshops to explore and test what social enterprise managers, researchers, and relevant policy makers meant by the term 'social enterprise'. This was the resulting definition: Social enterprises are organisations that: • Are led by an economic, social, cultural, or environmental mission consistent with a public or community benefit; • Trade to fulfil their mission; • Derive a substantial portion of their income from trade; and • Reinvest the majority of their profit/surplus in the fulfilment of their mission.
Our textbook defines corporate social responsibility as “a business's concern for the welfare of society” (Nickels, 102) and that it “goes well beyond being ethical. It is based on a commitment to integrity, fairness, and respect” (102). By performing a social audit they can evaluate whether or not their policies and actions are actually providing the support they’re attempting to
Social responsibility can be defined as “the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Mallen Baker, 2004). In addition, social responsibility has been defined differently by various corporate leaders that provide guidelines which impacts how one manages the core business. Social responsibility is an essential part of a business. If managed correctly should strengthen the competitive spirit of the company and provide prosperity to society.
So before we go in greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit societ...
There are several ways in which an individual or a business can be socially responsible that we have seen in our reading. In Animal Farm by George Orwell, the pig, Napoleon, manipulated his workers to improve the farm in any way possible while still convincing them that he is a much better leader than their previous leader Mr. Jones. In All My Sons by Arthur Miller, the father tries to hide the truth and in doing so, causes the death of his own son. And finally in the movie “The Corporation” there is Shell, a big company that not only harvests much of the Earth's resources, but damages the environment in which it produces oil. I myself will be different from this. I shall be socially responsible by not exploiting the unintelligent, evaluating my decisions and the impact they have on society, and...
The expectation that businesses behave responsibly and positively contribute to society all while pursuing their economic goals is one that holds firm through all generations. Stakeholders, both market and nonmarket, expect businesses to be socially responsible. Many companies have responded to this by including this growing expectation as part of their overall business operations. There are companies in existence today whose sole purpose is to socially benefit society alongside businesses who simply combine social benefits with their economic goals as their company mission. These changes in societal expectations and thus company purpose we’ve seen in the business community over time often blurs the line of what it means to be socially responsible, how far a company should go to achieve this and just how much it should cost.
The proposed paper is an extension of a term paper written towards incorporation in my final Master’s thesis. In the Creating a Research Space Model or CARS model (Swales, 1990) the project can currently be placed in the “Establishing a Niche” stage. The gist of this project lies in analyzing and developing framework for “transparent communication” between social enterprises and their partner organization to maximize impact of their project’s “civic calling”. The project will be a qualitative ethnographical enquiry for a short six-month project with a social enterprise to study all aspects of interaction with its partner organization. The aim of the project is to delve into the aspect of communication that social enterprise leaders emulate
Social responsibility is an ethical basis for organizations; they are required to act for the benefit of humanity in general. It is a responsibility that all individuals have to do to keep a sense of balance between the economy and every ecological system. This obligation can be passive, by evading involvement in socially harmful acts, or active, by doings things that directly advance social goals. In evaluating Company Q’s approach regarding social responsibility I can conclude that it isn’t responsible at all. Company Q is an undersized native grocery store in a major residential zone.
Social responsibility is the ethical framework which suggest that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large. According to investopedia.com, social responsibility is developing a business with a positive relationship to the society they operate in. (Investopedia, 2003) “ For companies, the overall aim is to achieve a positive impact on society as a whole while maximizing the creation of shared value for the owners of the business, its employees, shareholders and stakeholders.” (Tennant, 2015)
A social enterprise is an entrepreneurial, non-profit project that generates revenues and serves a social cause. It is a social value-creating activity implemented through innovative and resourceful approaches. Social entrepreneurs seek to create social value because they have identified a problem in society that they want to solve. Social entrepreneurs are risk takers. They are willing to take reasonable risk on behalf of the people the organization aims to serve. They understand that new opportunities arise in the changes in the government and the industry. The social and financial return of their investments are always weighed so that they true to their social mission. Social entrepreneurs have
I’ve always had that predominant perception that one can always rely on sympathy sales when running a Social Enterprise, “After all we are doing a good deed, society would see our hard efforts and lend us a hand won’t they?” That was my very own opinion towards running a Social Enterprise. Thankfully, this fallacy I had in my head was struck down by Debra’s sharing. I now understand that even though it is important for a Social Enterprise to be profit-orientated and to have a firm social cause to work in. We must not only take into consideration about the social mission that we are working towards but to also consider the consumers that we are serving to always ensure that we provide a service that is worthy enough to satisfy them to ensure that they will come back to bring business to us again.
The third part of the book is growing or expanding an enterprise. A social enterprise should not isolate itself from other organizations because it will be hard to attain success immediately. Growing the business would also mean that there should be a marketing effort shown. The difference between the marketing of a commercial business and the social business is that in commercial business they market the product itself. In the marketing part of a social business is that they first market their advocacy then they just add the products because their primary goal is to make the viewers be aware of the social problem. This book showed us one way to grow a business; it is by using social media. Today, people show their advocacies through social
Drawing on your knowledge of social innovation and organizational form, compare and contrast two organizational forms (e.g association and social movement; company limited by guarantee and coop; hybrid and some ‘pure’ form. Critically evaluate them with regard to their enabling or constraining impact on social innovation. Draw liberally on the relevant literature and illustrate with examples.
Two entrepreneurial approaches I will reflect upon are profit-oriented and social-oriented entrepreneurs. I will describe these approaches through two entrepreneurs, Victor Kiam and Anita Roddick. Victor Kiam was what one would call a profit entrepreneur. This is “a person who seeks a profitable opportunity and takes the necessary risks to set up and operate a business (Boone, Kurtz, 2011, pg.182). Anita Roddick, founder of The Body Shop, was a social-oriented entrepreneur. These types of entrepreneurs are “pioneers of innovations that benefit humanity” (Boone, Kurtz, 2011, pg.185). Social entrepreneurs not only want to profit from their business but also have an interest in helping society.
Social responsibility is the part of the framework of an organization or individual which makes up an obligation to act for the benefit of society. There are many different ways act out social responsibility. The social responsibilities of a business can be classified according to the businesses relationships to the general public, customers, employees and investors. The companies that make their product or service with the rooted mindset of benefiting the community and the world around them do this by providing things like scholarship funds, all natural products, biodegradable storage, and or just by treating the consumer as well as the employees as individuals rather than a corporate dollar sign. Businesses may exercise
Dunford( 2000) argues that a really good, sustainable social enterprise is not highly dependent on subsidies but also not necessarily subsidy free.